The Space Between Action and Reflection: Nursing Students' Experiences of Debriefing Timing.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jonathan Barrios
{"title":"The Space Between Action and Reflection: Nursing Students' Experiences of Debriefing Timing.","authors":"Jonathan Barrios","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Debriefing is widely regarded as a central component of simulation-based learning, yet limited attention has been given to how the timing of debriefing is experienced by learners in undergraduate courses that include graded simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interpretive qualitative study situated within a constructivist epistemological perspective was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 10 third-year undergraduate nursing students enrolled in a course that included simulation-based learning. Interviews explored participants' experiences of simulation, perceptions of debriefing timing and structure, and the perceived influence of feedback. Data were analyzed primarily using inductive, semantic thematic analysis with iterative comparison within and across transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six interrelated themes were identified: simulation as a high-pressure evaluative environment; temporal distance and difficulty recalling actions and reasoning; feedback focused on error identification without sufficient instructional guidance; temporally proximal feedback experienced as easier to connect to reasoning; peer presence as both supportive and anxiety-provoking; and instructor facilitation shaping psychological safety and engagement. Participants described difficulty recalling earlier decisions when later-session debriefing occurred after multiple scenarios and described temporally proximal feedback as easier to connect to their reasoning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants described simulation as an emotionally and cognitively demanding context in which the timing and structure of debriefing shaped their experiences of reflection. These findings reflect learner perceptions rather than objective learning outcomes. The timing of feedback may influence how learners engage in reflective discussion during simulation-based education. Further research examining relationships between debriefing timing and measurable learning outcomes is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Debriefing is widely regarded as a central component of simulation-based learning, yet limited attention has been given to how the timing of debriefing is experienced by learners in undergraduate courses that include graded simulation.

Methods: An interpretive qualitative study situated within a constructivist epistemological perspective was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 10 third-year undergraduate nursing students enrolled in a course that included simulation-based learning. Interviews explored participants' experiences of simulation, perceptions of debriefing timing and structure, and the perceived influence of feedback. Data were analyzed primarily using inductive, semantic thematic analysis with iterative comparison within and across transcripts.

Results: Six interrelated themes were identified: simulation as a high-pressure evaluative environment; temporal distance and difficulty recalling actions and reasoning; feedback focused on error identification without sufficient instructional guidance; temporally proximal feedback experienced as easier to connect to reasoning; peer presence as both supportive and anxiety-provoking; and instructor facilitation shaping psychological safety and engagement. Participants described difficulty recalling earlier decisions when later-session debriefing occurred after multiple scenarios and described temporally proximal feedback as easier to connect to their reasoning.

Conclusions: Participants described simulation as an emotionally and cognitively demanding context in which the timing and structure of debriefing shaped their experiences of reflection. These findings reflect learner perceptions rather than objective learning outcomes. The timing of feedback may influence how learners engage in reflective discussion during simulation-based education. Further research examining relationships between debriefing timing and measurable learning outcomes is warranted.

行动与反思之间的空间:护生汇报时间的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书