A I de Santiago, S A Ricketts, C H Wilde, K R Moran, S S Glenn, E R Casco, J S Cowan, C R Danly, V E Fatherley, D N Fittinghoff, H J Jorgenson, M P Selwood, P L Volegov
{"title":"Impact of afterglow correction uncertainty on down-scattered neutron imaging at the National Ignition Facility.","authors":"A I de Santiago, S A Ricketts, C H Wilde, K R Moran, S S Glenn, E R Casco, J S Cowan, C R Danly, V E Fatherley, D N Fittinghoff, H J Jorgenson, M P Selwood, P L Volegov","doi":"10.1063/5.0350769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Down-scattered neutron imaging (6-12 MeV) at the National Ignition Facility diagnoses cold fuel assembly in inertial confinement fusion experiments. Residual primary neutron signal (afterglow) from scintillator decay must be subtracted from down-scattered measurements. With afterglow correction uncertainty comparable to the signal itself (both at the 1%-4% level relative to primary), reconstructions are highly sensitive to correction errors. We examine this sensitivity by perturbing the afterglow correction factor from -75% to +75% in 5% increments for shot N250126. Legendre P0 contour analysis at 17%, 50%, 80%, and 90% intensity levels reveals that outer contours (17%, 50%) show <10% variation across the full perturbation range, while inner contours (80%, 90%) exhibit steep sensitivity to over-subtraction, with >40% variation as the correction factor increases. The sensitivity is asymmetric: over-subtraction causes rapid degradation and peak location shifts due to the oblate primary geometry, while under-subtraction produces near-linear changes. For analyses of internal hotspot features, under-subtraction is preferable to over-subtraction to avoid reconstruction artifacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21111,"journal":{"name":"Review of Scientific Instruments","volume":"97 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Scientific Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0350769","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Down-scattered neutron imaging (6-12 MeV) at the National Ignition Facility diagnoses cold fuel assembly in inertial confinement fusion experiments. Residual primary neutron signal (afterglow) from scintillator decay must be subtracted from down-scattered measurements. With afterglow correction uncertainty comparable to the signal itself (both at the 1%-4% level relative to primary), reconstructions are highly sensitive to correction errors. We examine this sensitivity by perturbing the afterglow correction factor from -75% to +75% in 5% increments for shot N250126. Legendre P0 contour analysis at 17%, 50%, 80%, and 90% intensity levels reveals that outer contours (17%, 50%) show <10% variation across the full perturbation range, while inner contours (80%, 90%) exhibit steep sensitivity to over-subtraction, with >40% variation as the correction factor increases. The sensitivity is asymmetric: over-subtraction causes rapid degradation and peak location shifts due to the oblate primary geometry, while under-subtraction produces near-linear changes. For analyses of internal hotspot features, under-subtraction is preferable to over-subtraction to avoid reconstruction artifacts.
期刊介绍:
Review of Scientific Instruments, is committed to the publication of advances in scientific instruments, apparatuses, and techniques. RSI seeks to meet the needs of engineers and scientists in physics, chemistry, and the life sciences.