Functional recovery of patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury after extended and standard early rehabilitation.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-09-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1932368
N Keleman, N Pilipović, Z Sučević, R Krasnik, D Dragičević-Cvjetković, S Palija, D Bojinović-Rodić
{"title":"Functional recovery of patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury after extended and standard early rehabilitation.","authors":"N Keleman, N Pilipović, Z Sučević, R Krasnik, D Dragičević-Cvjetković, S Palija, D Bojinović-Rodić","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2026.1932368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity, disability and mortality in all age groups. Treatment and early rehabilitation are crucial to the overall level of recovery. The objective is to compare the effects of standard and extended early rehabilitation on the functional recovery of patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Material: </strong>A prospective experimental study comprised 114 patients with moderate and severe TBI, randomly divided into two groups. The patients of the experimental group had kinesitherapy 7 days a week, twice a day for 45 min, and the patients of the control group had kinesitherapy 7 days a week, twice a day for 30 min. The follow-up parameters were: age sex, clinical characteristics, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Barthel Index (BI) on admission and discharge and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>114 patients were randomly divided into two groups of 57 patients each. Males dominate (75.4%), the average age of the sample was Me = 59.0. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in gender, age and clinical characteristics, GCS on admission; 59(51.8%) patient had severe, 55 (48.2%) moderate TBI, at discharge: 12 (10.5%) had severe, 11(9.6%) moderate and 91(79.8%) mild TBI. FIM of the experimental group was 18 vs. 70 and of the control group was 18 vs. 50, BI of the experimental group was 0 vs. 61 and of the control group was 0 vs. 32. GOS at discharge: complete recovery in the experimental group 9, in the control group 7, mild deficit 22 vs. 15, severe deficit 22 vs. 28, vegetative state 4 vs. 7. Normalized improvement (ratio of achieved progress to maximum possible progress) was higher in the prolonged early rehabilitation group: for FIM (48% vs. 30%), BI (61% vs. 32%) and slightly less for GCS (100% vs. 92%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although no statistically significant difference on functional recovery between the groups was found, however, a difference in percentage progress was found in favor of extended early rehabilitation, but for a final conclusion it is necessary to make a follow-up after inpatient rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"1932368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1932368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity, disability and mortality in all age groups. Treatment and early rehabilitation are crucial to the overall level of recovery. The objective is to compare the effects of standard and extended early rehabilitation on the functional recovery of patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.

Material: A prospective experimental study comprised 114 patients with moderate and severe TBI, randomly divided into two groups. The patients of the experimental group had kinesitherapy 7 days a week, twice a day for 45 min, and the patients of the control group had kinesitherapy 7 days a week, twice a day for 30 min. The follow-up parameters were: age sex, clinical characteristics, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Barthel Index (BI) on admission and discharge and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at discharge.

Results: 114 patients were randomly divided into two groups of 57 patients each. Males dominate (75.4%), the average age of the sample was Me = 59.0. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in gender, age and clinical characteristics, GCS on admission; 59(51.8%) patient had severe, 55 (48.2%) moderate TBI, at discharge: 12 (10.5%) had severe, 11(9.6%) moderate and 91(79.8%) mild TBI. FIM of the experimental group was 18 vs. 70 and of the control group was 18 vs. 50, BI of the experimental group was 0 vs. 61 and of the control group was 0 vs. 32. GOS at discharge: complete recovery in the experimental group 9, in the control group 7, mild deficit 22 vs. 15, severe deficit 22 vs. 28, vegetative state 4 vs. 7. Normalized improvement (ratio of achieved progress to maximum possible progress) was higher in the prolonged early rehabilitation group: for FIM (48% vs. 30%), BI (61% vs. 32%) and slightly less for GCS (100% vs. 92%).

Conclusion: Although no statistically significant difference on functional recovery between the groups was found, however, a difference in percentage progress was found in favor of extended early rehabilitation, but for a final conclusion it is necessary to make a follow-up after inpatient rehabilitation.

中重度外伤性脑损伤患者早期延长和标准康复后的功能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书