Lactic acid bacteria, corn straw and extruded corn straw enhanced nutritional quality: reshaping the microbiome to improve the silage fermentation of paper mulberry

IF 5.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ningwei Wang, Mingxin Wu, Chunze Guo, Yanli Lin, Kuikui Ni, Xuekai Wang, Fuyu Yang
{"title":"Lactic acid bacteria, corn straw and extruded corn straw enhanced nutritional quality: reshaping the microbiome to improve the silage fermentation of paper mulberry","authors":"Ningwei Wang,&nbsp;Mingxin Wu,&nbsp;Chunze Guo,&nbsp;Yanli Lin,&nbsp;Kuikui Ni,&nbsp;Xuekai Wang,&nbsp;Fuyu Yang","doi":"10.1186/s40538-026-01010-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Producing high-quality silage from fresh paper mulberry is challenging due to its elevated moisture levels, reduced amounts of water-soluble carbohydrates, and a scarce population of epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (LAB). This work evaluated the influence of corn straw (CS), extruded corn straw (ECS), and <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> (L) on nutrition preservation, fermentation performance, and bacterial communities structure in paper mulberry silage.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The impacts of corn straw and extruded corn straw, supplied alone or in combination with <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> (CSL or ECSL), on fermentation efficiency and microbial ecology of paper mulberry silage were examined. After fermentation, all treated silages exhibited superior dry matter (DM) levels than the control (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). In particular, the 40%CSL and 40%ECSL treatments enhanced fermentation quality by lowering pH and ammonia-N concentrations while stimulating the accumulation of lactic and acetic acids (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Comparative community analyses revealed pronounced shifts in bacterial composition following additive application, with treated silages exhibiting microbial communities clearly differentiated from the control. At genus level, <i>Companilactobacillus</i>, <i>Levilactobacillus</i>, and <i>Paenibacillus</i> became the most dominant genera in 20%ECS, 40%ECS, and 40%ECSL, whereas <i>Companilactobacillus</i> and <i>Clostridium</i> predominated in the control. At species level, <i>Clostridium luticellarii</i> became the most dominant bacterium in the control. In contrast, <i>Companilactobacillus pabuli</i> and <i>Levilactobacillus namurensis</i> became the dominant bacteria in 40%CS, 20%CSL, 40%CSL, 20%ECS, and 20%ECSL while <i>Lactobacillus</i> sp. PFC-70 was dominant in 40%ECS and 40%ECSL. Correlation analysis showed that <i>Lactobacillus</i> sp. PFC-70 was positively associated with fermentation acid accumulation, whereas <i>Companilactobacillus pabuli</i> was liked to lower ammonium-N concentration. Collectively, these findings indicated that paper mulberry silage with addition of CS, ECS, or their combinations with <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> effectively promote desirable fermentation outcomes through reshaping bacterial ecological succession.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The incorporation of CS, ECS, and <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> effectively promoted a more favorable fermentation pattern in paper mulberry, characterized by suppressed ammonia formation and enhanced lactic acid accumulation. These treatments inhibited undesirable bacteria and promoted beneficial fermentation. Overall, this combined strategy represents a practical and efficient approach to enhancing silage quality and utilization of agricultural by-products.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":512,"journal":{"name":"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40538-026-01010-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40538-026-01010-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Producing high-quality silage from fresh paper mulberry is challenging due to its elevated moisture levels, reduced amounts of water-soluble carbohydrates, and a scarce population of epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (LAB). This work evaluated the influence of corn straw (CS), extruded corn straw (ECS), and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L) on nutrition preservation, fermentation performance, and bacterial communities structure in paper mulberry silage.

Results

The impacts of corn straw and extruded corn straw, supplied alone or in combination with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (CSL or ECSL), on fermentation efficiency and microbial ecology of paper mulberry silage were examined. After fermentation, all treated silages exhibited superior dry matter (DM) levels than the control (P < 0.05). In particular, the 40%CSL and 40%ECSL treatments enhanced fermentation quality by lowering pH and ammonia-N concentrations while stimulating the accumulation of lactic and acetic acids (P < 0.05). Comparative community analyses revealed pronounced shifts in bacterial composition following additive application, with treated silages exhibiting microbial communities clearly differentiated from the control. At genus level, Companilactobacillus, Levilactobacillus, and Paenibacillus became the most dominant genera in 20%ECS, 40%ECS, and 40%ECSL, whereas Companilactobacillus and Clostridium predominated in the control. At species level, Clostridium luticellarii became the most dominant bacterium in the control. In contrast, Companilactobacillus pabuli and Levilactobacillus namurensis became the dominant bacteria in 40%CS, 20%CSL, 40%CSL, 20%ECS, and 20%ECSL while Lactobacillus sp. PFC-70 was dominant in 40%ECS and 40%ECSL. Correlation analysis showed that Lactobacillus sp. PFC-70 was positively associated with fermentation acid accumulation, whereas Companilactobacillus pabuli was liked to lower ammonium-N concentration. Collectively, these findings indicated that paper mulberry silage with addition of CS, ECS, or their combinations with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum effectively promote desirable fermentation outcomes through reshaping bacterial ecological succession.

Conclusion

The incorporation of CS, ECS, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum effectively promoted a more favorable fermentation pattern in paper mulberry, characterized by suppressed ammonia formation and enhanced lactic acid accumulation. These treatments inhibited undesirable bacteria and promoted beneficial fermentation. Overall, this combined strategy represents a practical and efficient approach to enhancing silage quality and utilization of agricultural by-products.

Graphical Abstract

乳酸菌、玉米秸秆和膨化玉米秸秆提高营养品质:重塑微生物群,改善桑树青贮发酵
从新鲜的纸桑树中生产高质量的青贮是具有挑战性的,因为它的水分水平升高,水溶性碳水化合物的数量减少,以及附生乳酸菌(LAB)的稀少。研究了玉米秸秆(CS)、膨化玉米秸秆(ECS)和植物乳杆菌(L)对纸桑青贮营养保存、发酵性能和细菌群落结构的影响。结果研究了玉米秸秆和膨化玉米秸秆单独或与植物乳杆菌(CSL或ECSL)联合使用对纸桑青贮发酵效率和微生物生态的影响。发酵后,各处理青贮干物质水平均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。特别是,40%CSL和40%ECSL处理通过降低pH和氨氮浓度,刺激乳酸和乙酸的积累,提高了发酵质量(P < 0.05)。群落对比分析显示,添加添加剂后,青贮饲料的细菌组成发生了显著变化,处理过的青贮饲料的微生物群落与对照组明显不同。在属水平上,20%ECS、40%ECS和40%ECSL中,乳酸菌属(Companilactobacillus)、乳酸杆菌属(Levilactobacillus)和拟芽孢杆菌属(Paenibacillus)为优势属,而对照组中乳酸菌属(Companilactobacillus)和梭状芽孢杆菌属(Clostridium)为优势属。在种水平上,黄体梭状芽胞杆菌成为对照中最优势的细菌。40%CS、20%CSL、40%CSL、20%ECS和20%ECSL的优势菌为PFC-70乳酸杆菌,40%ECS和40%ECSL的优势菌为PFC-70乳酸杆菌。相关分析表明,PFC-70与发酵产酸积累呈正相关,而pabuli则倾向于降低氨氮浓度。综上所述,在桑树青贮饲料中添加CS、ECS或其与植物乳杆菌的组合可通过重塑细菌生态演替,有效促进理想的发酵结果。结论CS、ECS和植物乳杆菌的掺入有效地促进了桑树的发酵模式,抑制了氨的形成,增强了乳酸的积累。这些处理抑制了有害细菌,促进了有益发酵。综上所述,这种综合策略是提高青贮质量和农副产品利用率的一种切实有效的方法。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed forum for the advancement and application to all fields of agriculture of modern chemical, biochemical and molecular technologies. The scope of this journal includes chemical and biochemical processes aimed to increase sustainable agricultural and food production, the evaluation of quality and origin of raw primary products and their transformation into foods and chemicals, as well as environmental monitoring and remediation. Of special interest are the effects of chemical and biochemical technologies, also at the nano and supramolecular scale, on the relationships between soil, plants, microorganisms and their environment, with the help of modern bioinformatics. Another special focus is the use of modern bioorganic and biological chemistry to develop new technologies for plant nutrition and bio-stimulation, advancement of biorefineries from biomasses, safe and traceable food products, carbon storage in soil and plants and restoration of contaminated soils to agriculture. This journal presents the first opportunity to bring together researchers from a wide number of disciplines within the agricultural chemical and biological sciences, from both industry and academia. The principle aim of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is to allow the exchange of the most advanced chemical and biochemical knowledge to develop technologies which address one of the most pressing challenges of our times - sustaining a growing world population. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture publishes original research articles, short letters and invited reviews. Articles from scientists in industry, academia as well as private research institutes, non-governmental and environmental organizations are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书