From extractive to generative: multi-document summarization in the era of generative AI - advances, challenges, and emerging trends

IF 18.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2026-06-03 Epub Date: 2026-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s10462-026-11580-z
Balamurugan Palanisamy, G. S. S. Chalapathi, Vikas Hassija
{"title":"From extractive to generative: multi-document summarization in the era of generative AI - advances, challenges, and emerging trends","authors":"Balamurugan Palanisamy,&nbsp;G. S. S. Chalapathi,&nbsp;Vikas Hassija","doi":"10.1007/s10462-026-11580-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multi-Document Summarization (MDS) has evolved from extractive techniques to sophisticated generative models, driven by advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), diffusion-based generation, and graph-enhanced architectures. While these methods have significantly improved the coherence, informativeness, and factuality of summaries, the growing diversity of approaches has introduced challenges in understanding their design trade-offs, domain applicability, and evaluation. This survey provides a comprehensive review of generative MDS models, offering a structured taxonomy that categorizes them into LLM-based, RAG-enhanced, graph-augmented, and diffusion-based families. We analyze each category’s architectural principles, capabilities, and limitations. In addition, we highlight benchmark datasets, evaluation protocols, and key application domains, including healthcare, legal, and scientific summarization. To move beyond descriptive comparison, we propose a unified analytical framework that decomposes generative MDS into three core dimensions: information aggregation, structural reasoning, and factual grounding. This framework organizes prior work, clarifies architectural trade-offs, and connects current limitations to actionable future research directions. Finally, we discuss open challenges such as hallucination, domain adaptation, and evaluation bottlenecks, and propose future research directions. This survey aims to guide researchers and practitioners in navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of trustworthy and scalable generative MDS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"59 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-026-11580-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11580-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-Document Summarization (MDS) has evolved from extractive techniques to sophisticated generative models, driven by advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), diffusion-based generation, and graph-enhanced architectures. While these methods have significantly improved the coherence, informativeness, and factuality of summaries, the growing diversity of approaches has introduced challenges in understanding their design trade-offs, domain applicability, and evaluation. This survey provides a comprehensive review of generative MDS models, offering a structured taxonomy that categorizes them into LLM-based, RAG-enhanced, graph-augmented, and diffusion-based families. We analyze each category’s architectural principles, capabilities, and limitations. In addition, we highlight benchmark datasets, evaluation protocols, and key application domains, including healthcare, legal, and scientific summarization. To move beyond descriptive comparison, we propose a unified analytical framework that decomposes generative MDS into three core dimensions: information aggregation, structural reasoning, and factual grounding. This framework organizes prior work, clarifies architectural trade-offs, and connects current limitations to actionable future research directions. Finally, we discuss open challenges such as hallucination, domain adaptation, and evaluation bottlenecks, and propose future research directions. This survey aims to guide researchers and practitioners in navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of trustworthy and scalable generative MDS.

从抽取到生成:生成人工智能时代的多文档摘要——进展、挑战和新趋势
在大型语言模型(llm)、检索增强生成(RAG)、基于扩散的生成和图形增强架构的推动下,多文档摘要(MDS)已经从提取技术发展到复杂的生成模型。虽然这些方法显著地提高了摘要的一致性、信息性和真实性,但是方法的多样性在理解它们的设计权衡、领域适用性和评估方面带来了挑战。本调查提供了生成MDS模型的全面回顾,提供了一个结构化的分类法,将它们分为基于llm的、基于rag增强的、图形增强的和基于扩散的家族。我们分析每个类别的架构原则、功能和限制。此外,我们还重点介绍了基准数据集、评估协议和关键应用领域,包括医疗保健、法律和科学摘要。为了超越描述性比较,我们提出了一个统一的分析框架,将生成式MDS分解为三个核心维度:信息聚合、结构推理和事实基础。这个框架组织了之前的工作,澄清了架构的权衡,并将当前的限制与可操作的未来研究方向联系起来。最后,我们讨论了幻觉、领域适应和评估瓶颈等开放性挑战,并提出了未来的研究方向。本调查旨在指导研究人员和从业人员在可信赖和可扩展的生成MDS快速发展的环境中导航。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书