Nan Dou, Hao Lei, Raquel Arbaiza, Leah E Chapman, Ann Kuhn, Juliana F W Cohen, Erin R Hager
{"title":"Classroom Movement Breaks in Relation to Health and Academic Outcomes: An Umbrella Review.","authors":"Nan Dou, Hao Lei, Raquel Arbaiza, Leah E Chapman, Ann Kuhn, Juliana F W Cohen, Erin R Hager","doi":"10.1111/josh.70252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Classroom movement breaks (CMBs) reduce school-day sedentary time. This umbrella review synthesized evidence on health and academic benefits of CMBs among school-aged children and explored outcomes by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of systematic reviews and meta-analyses up to April 2024 was conducted in five databases. Reviews examining CMBs' impacts on health and/or academic outcomes were included. Study quality was assessed using AMSTAR2.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Sixteen reviews examined PA (physical activity; n = 12), classroom behaviors (n = 5), academics (n = 9, 4-overall and 6-domain-specific academics), cognition (n = 8), and health (n = 5). All PA-outcome reviews reported benefits. Most reviews reported improved classroom behaviors (3/5), cognition (6/8), and overall academics (3/4). Findings were mixed for domain-specific academics and inconclusive for health. Methodological quality of all reviews was rated as low/critically low. Few reviews assessed differences by race, ethnicity, or SES.</p><p><strong>Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: </strong>Although CMBs showed potential benefits, recommendations for school implementation should be made with caution. Equity impacts remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMBs may benefit students' activity, classroom behaviors, overall academics, and cognition, but evidence for subject-specific academics and health remained mixed or inconclusive. Current findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future research should address low methodological quality, utilize long-term designs, incorporate uniform CMBs interventions/outcome measures, and address equity gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":"96 10","pages":"e70252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.70252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Classroom movement breaks (CMBs) reduce school-day sedentary time. This umbrella review synthesized evidence on health and academic benefits of CMBs among school-aged children and explored outcomes by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES).
Methods: A systematic search of systematic reviews and meta-analyses up to April 2024 was conducted in five databases. Reviews examining CMBs' impacts on health and/or academic outcomes were included. Study quality was assessed using AMSTAR2.
Findings: Sixteen reviews examined PA (physical activity; n = 12), classroom behaviors (n = 5), academics (n = 9, 4-overall and 6-domain-specific academics), cognition (n = 8), and health (n = 5). All PA-outcome reviews reported benefits. Most reviews reported improved classroom behaviors (3/5), cognition (6/8), and overall academics (3/4). Findings were mixed for domain-specific academics and inconclusive for health. Methodological quality of all reviews was rated as low/critically low. Few reviews assessed differences by race, ethnicity, or SES.
Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: Although CMBs showed potential benefits, recommendations for school implementation should be made with caution. Equity impacts remain understudied.
Conclusions: CMBs may benefit students' activity, classroom behaviors, overall academics, and cognition, but evidence for subject-specific academics and health remained mixed or inconclusive. Current findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future research should address low methodological quality, utilize long-term designs, incorporate uniform CMBs interventions/outcome measures, and address equity gaps.
期刊介绍:
Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.