Computational Prioritisation of Fish-Derived Antimicrobial Peptides by Integrated Multi-Layer Immunogenicity and Structural Analysis.

IF 5.3 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Akshay Sasidharan, Ananya Pandey, Shreya Nandi Roy, Vinutha Anandhan Sujatha, Kanishk Prabhu, Rajasekaran Ramalingam
{"title":"Computational Prioritisation of Fish-Derived Antimicrobial Peptides by Integrated Multi-Layer Immunogenicity and Structural Analysis.","authors":"Akshay Sasidharan, Ananya Pandey, Shreya Nandi Roy, Vinutha Anandhan Sujatha, Kanishk Prabhu, Rajasekaran Ramalingam","doi":"10.1007/s12602-026-11240-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fish-derived antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a promising but underexplored source of therapeutic candidates. However, their immunological safety for potential human application has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we applied a multi-stage computational approach to 154 fish AMPs retrieved from the Antimicrobial Peptide Database (APD6). Sequential safety filtering reduced the dataset to 23 AMP candidates, which were subsequently evaluated using a composite safety and immunogenicity risk score based on MHC class I binding, MHC class II binding, B-cell epitope exposure, and residual hemolytic risk. B-cell risk was conditioned on MHC class II activation to account for the role of CD4⁺ T-cell help in class-switched antibody responses. Eight AMPs were classified as Predicted Low Risk based on their relative composite safety and immunogenicity risk. Both this classification and the rank order of the three highest-ranked candidates remained stable across the tested sensitivity scenarios. The eight Predicted Low Risk candidates were further evaluated for conformational variability, secondary structure, structural rigidity, and membrane interaction. NRC-01 showed the lowest composite safety and immunogenicity risk score (0.213), indicating the lowest predicted risk among the evaluated candidates. NRC-18 achieved the highest final multi-criteria score (0.764), combining a relatively low composite safety and immunogenicity risk score (0.296), strong predicted membrane interaction (ΔG = -5.2 kcal/mol), high helical content (69.0%), and the highest dominant cluster population among the top three candidates (57.86%). Overall, the combined computational analyses identified a small group of fish-derived AMPs with favourable predicted safety, immunogenicity, and structural characteristics that warrant further experimental investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20506,"journal":{"name":"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-026-11240-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fish-derived antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a promising but underexplored source of therapeutic candidates. However, their immunological safety for potential human application has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we applied a multi-stage computational approach to 154 fish AMPs retrieved from the Antimicrobial Peptide Database (APD6). Sequential safety filtering reduced the dataset to 23 AMP candidates, which were subsequently evaluated using a composite safety and immunogenicity risk score based on MHC class I binding, MHC class II binding, B-cell epitope exposure, and residual hemolytic risk. B-cell risk was conditioned on MHC class II activation to account for the role of CD4⁺ T-cell help in class-switched antibody responses. Eight AMPs were classified as Predicted Low Risk based on their relative composite safety and immunogenicity risk. Both this classification and the rank order of the three highest-ranked candidates remained stable across the tested sensitivity scenarios. The eight Predicted Low Risk candidates were further evaluated for conformational variability, secondary structure, structural rigidity, and membrane interaction. NRC-01 showed the lowest composite safety and immunogenicity risk score (0.213), indicating the lowest predicted risk among the evaluated candidates. NRC-18 achieved the highest final multi-criteria score (0.764), combining a relatively low composite safety and immunogenicity risk score (0.296), strong predicted membrane interaction (ΔG = -5.2 kcal/mol), high helical content (69.0%), and the highest dominant cluster population among the top three candidates (57.86%). Overall, the combined computational analyses identified a small group of fish-derived AMPs with favourable predicted safety, immunogenicity, and structural characteristics that warrant further experimental investigation.

基于多层免疫原性和结构分析的鱼源抗菌肽计算优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGYMICROB-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
140
期刊介绍: Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins publishes reviews, original articles, letters and short notes and technical/methodological communications aimed at advancing fundamental knowledge and exploration of the applications of probiotics, natural antimicrobial proteins and their derivatives in biomedical, agricultural, veterinary, food, and cosmetic products. The Journal welcomes fundamental research articles and reports on applications of these microorganisms and substances, and encourages structural studies and studies that correlate the structure and functional properties of antimicrobial proteins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书