Nutritional Evaluation and Protein Quality Assessment of Green Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Treated with Different Cooking Methods.

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Lucia Crysanthy Soedirga, Alphen Rianto, Nuri Arum Anugrahati, Intan Cidarbulan Matita, Florecita Meisy Natasya Sanaky
{"title":"Nutritional Evaluation and Protein Quality Assessment of Green Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Treated with Different Cooking Methods.","authors":"Lucia Crysanthy Soedirga, Alphen Rianto, Nuri Arum Anugrahati, Intan Cidarbulan Matita, Florecita Meisy Natasya Sanaky","doi":"10.1007/s11130-026-01576-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Green peas (Pisum sativum L.) are recognized as a sustainable source with protein content ranging from 23.1 to 30.9% on a dry basis. Data regarding the impact of household cooking methods on pea protein quality remain limited. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of four cooking methods - steaming (S4), boiling (B4), slow cooking (SC1), and pressure cooking (PC30) - compared with a control (without cooking treatment) on the nutritional profile, including protein content and in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD). SC1 was identified as the selected method, producing 6.52 ± 0.43% protein (wet basis) and 30.89 ± 0.51% IVPD. Slow-cooked peas showed an increase in the concentrations of both essential and non-essential amino acids compared to the control. The Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) of slow-cooked peas increased when compared to the control, except for sulfur-containing amino acids (SAAs) and aromatic amino acids (AAAs). Although the threonine concentration increased after slow cooking for 1 h, threonine remained the limiting amino acid in the cooked pea protein, with a DIAAS of 14.64 ± 0.04%, showing that even effective cooking could not overcome inherent threonine limitations. This study provides quantifiable benchmarks to support the nutritional security of plant-based diets under SDG 2 (Zero Hunger).</p>","PeriodicalId":20092,"journal":{"name":"Plant Foods for Human Nutrition","volume":"81 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Foods for Human Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-026-01576-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green peas (Pisum sativum L.) are recognized as a sustainable source with protein content ranging from 23.1 to 30.9% on a dry basis. Data regarding the impact of household cooking methods on pea protein quality remain limited. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of four cooking methods - steaming (S4), boiling (B4), slow cooking (SC1), and pressure cooking (PC30) - compared with a control (without cooking treatment) on the nutritional profile, including protein content and in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD). SC1 was identified as the selected method, producing 6.52 ± 0.43% protein (wet basis) and 30.89 ± 0.51% IVPD. Slow-cooked peas showed an increase in the concentrations of both essential and non-essential amino acids compared to the control. The Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) of slow-cooked peas increased when compared to the control, except for sulfur-containing amino acids (SAAs) and aromatic amino acids (AAAs). Although the threonine concentration increased after slow cooking for 1 h, threonine remained the limiting amino acid in the cooked pea protein, with a DIAAS of 14.64 ± 0.04%, showing that even effective cooking could not overcome inherent threonine limitations. This study provides quantifiable benchmarks to support the nutritional security of plant-based diets under SDG 2 (Zero Hunger).

青豆(Pisum sativum L.)的营养评价和蛋白质品质评价用不同的烹调方法处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (previously Qualitas Plantarum) is an international journal that publishes reports of original research and critical reviews concerned with the improvement and evaluation of the nutritional quality of plant foods for humans, as they are influenced by: - Biotechnology (all fields, including molecular biology and genetic engineering) - Food science and technology - Functional, nutraceutical or pharma foods - Other nutrients and non-nutrients inherent in plant foods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书