Associations between pre-to-post TMS-evoked potential changes and motor sequence learning across retention intervals.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-09-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1925178
Fransina Christina King, Narayanankutty Naduvilidam, Milos R Ljubisavljevic, Fatima Yousif Ismail
{"title":"Associations between pre-to-post TMS-evoked potential changes and motor sequence learning across retention intervals.","authors":"Fransina Christina King, Narayanankutty Naduvilidam, Milos R Ljubisavljevic, Fatima Yousif Ismail","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2026.1925178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor sequence learning involves practice-related changes in behavior and neural activity, yet the neurophysiological markers associated with later retention remain unclear. TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) provide a measure of cortical responses to stimulation and may help characterize physiological-behavioral relationships across different learning timescales. Whether these associations differ across retention intervals remains unclear. We examined whether baseline TMS-EEG measures or task-related changes in right primary motor cortex (M1) TEPs are associated with initial acquisition and subsequent performance change across short and long-term retention intervals during a non-dominant hand motor sequence task. Seventeen healthy right-handed adults performed a five-element finger-tapping sequence with the left hand across three sessions: Day 1 (acquisition), Day 2 (short-term retention), and Day 7 (long-term retention). Single-pulse TMS-EEG was acquired before and after task performance over right M1 at each session. Four TEP components (N45, N100, P180, and N280) were analyzed. Day 1 training was associated with increases in PR and ACC, together with improved accuracy-adjusted efficiency, and slope dynamics remained broadly stable across later test sessions. Acute pre-to-post right-M1 TEP changes were not associated with rapid within-session acquisition. Pre-to-post P180 TEP change showed a nominal association with subsequent efficiency change, with a stronger nominal pattern over the 24-h interval than over the 5-day interval. However, neither the P180 dTEP effect nor the Interval × dTEP interaction survived FDR correction, and both were sensitive to participant-level influence and bootstrap resampling. These findings suggest that right-M1 TEP measures showed different relationships with rapid within-session acquisition and between-session performance change. Late P180 changes may be related to performance change across different retention intervals, but whether they reflect time-dependent consolidation processes remains to be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"1925178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13642314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1925178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motor sequence learning involves practice-related changes in behavior and neural activity, yet the neurophysiological markers associated with later retention remain unclear. TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) provide a measure of cortical responses to stimulation and may help characterize physiological-behavioral relationships across different learning timescales. Whether these associations differ across retention intervals remains unclear. We examined whether baseline TMS-EEG measures or task-related changes in right primary motor cortex (M1) TEPs are associated with initial acquisition and subsequent performance change across short and long-term retention intervals during a non-dominant hand motor sequence task. Seventeen healthy right-handed adults performed a five-element finger-tapping sequence with the left hand across three sessions: Day 1 (acquisition), Day 2 (short-term retention), and Day 7 (long-term retention). Single-pulse TMS-EEG was acquired before and after task performance over right M1 at each session. Four TEP components (N45, N100, P180, and N280) were analyzed. Day 1 training was associated with increases in PR and ACC, together with improved accuracy-adjusted efficiency, and slope dynamics remained broadly stable across later test sessions. Acute pre-to-post right-M1 TEP changes were not associated with rapid within-session acquisition. Pre-to-post P180 TEP change showed a nominal association with subsequent efficiency change, with a stronger nominal pattern over the 24-h interval than over the 5-day interval. However, neither the P180 dTEP effect nor the Interval × dTEP interaction survived FDR correction, and both were sensitive to participant-level influence and bootstrap resampling. These findings suggest that right-M1 TEP measures showed different relationships with rapid within-session acquisition and between-session performance change. Late P180 changes may be related to performance change across different retention intervals, but whether they reflect time-dependent consolidation processes remains to be established.

颅磁刺激前后诱发电位变化与运动序列学习的关系。
运动序列学习涉及与练习相关的行为和神经活动的变化,但与后期保留相关的神经生理标记尚不清楚。tms诱发电位(TEPs)提供了皮层对刺激反应的测量,可能有助于表征不同学习时间尺度上的生理-行为关系。这些关联是否在不同的保留期有所不同尚不清楚。我们研究了在非优势手运动序列任务中,基线TMS-EEG测量或右侧初级运动皮层(M1) TEPs的任务相关变化是否与初始习得和随后的短期和长期保留间隔的表现变化有关。17名健康的右撇子成年人在三个阶段中使用左手进行五要素手指敲击序列:第1天(习得)、第2天(短期留存)和第7天(长期留存)。单脉冲TMS-EEG分别在任务执行前和执行后的右侧M1上进行采集。分析四种TEP成分(N45、N100、P180和N280)。第1天的训练与PR和ACC的增加有关,同时提高了准确性调整效率,并且斜坡动力学在随后的测试中保持大致稳定。急性前-后右- m1 TEP变化与快速的会话内习得无关。前后P180 TEP的变化与随后的效率变化有名义上的关联,24小时的名义模式强于5天的名义模式。然而,P180 dTEP效应和Interval × dTEP相互作用都不能在FDR校正后存活,并且两者都对参与者水平的影响和自举重采样敏感。这些发现表明,右m1步进测量与快速的会话内习得和会话间性能变化之间存在不同的关系。P180后期的变化可能与不同保留期的性能变化有关,但它们是否反映了与时间相关的巩固过程仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书