From design to implementation: policy evolution of home-based primary care in Korea.

IF 6.2 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2026-07-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igag084
Eunhee Choi, Jihwan Lee, Bokyoung Choi, Yumi Shin, Jihee Choi, Jakyung Lee, Ahreum Choi, Soong-Nang Jang, Hyejin Lee, Chang-O Kim
{"title":"From design to implementation: policy evolution of home-based primary care in Korea.","authors":"Eunhee Choi, Jihwan Lee, Bokyoung Choi, Yumi Shin, Jihee Choi, Jakyung Lee, Ahreum Choi, Soong-Nang Jang, Hyejin Lee, Chang-O Kim","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igag084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>South Korea's rapid expansion of the older adult population, along with growing health and social care needs, has created an urgent demand for Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC). This study identified key design priorities for a Korean HBPC model and examined their reflection in the national pilot.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study was designed as a case study of the development and implementation of Korea's HBPC pilot program, using a dual-method approach for descriptive analysis. First, semi-structured interviews with 42 key informants, including policy makers, legal experts, researchers, and clinicians, identified design priorities using the 5P framework (Purpose, Population, People, Process, and Patterns). Second, policy documents and implementation guidelines from Phases 1-4 were reviewed to trace the program's evolution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders emphasized that the primary objectives of HBPC should be to support aging in place, preserve functional ability, and reduce avoidable medical expenditures. Stakeholders supported gradually expanding the target population. However, a central point of contention involved whether to lower provider eligibility thresholds to increase scalability or raise them to ensure service quality. Document analysis revealed that revisions across Phases 1-4 expanded eligibility for recipients and providers and reduced coinsurance rates, thereby improving accessibility. Nonetheless, interdisciplinary training and a comprehensive performance evaluation framework remain in early stages.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Integrating stakeholder perspectives into policy design grounds HBPC development in practical experience. These findings underscore HBPC's potential in supporting aging in place among high-need, vulnerable populations and inform the development of inclusive, adaptable community-based care models.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 10","pages":"igag084"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13626712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: South Korea's rapid expansion of the older adult population, along with growing health and social care needs, has created an urgent demand for Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC). This study identified key design priorities for a Korean HBPC model and examined their reflection in the national pilot.

Research design and methods: This study was designed as a case study of the development and implementation of Korea's HBPC pilot program, using a dual-method approach for descriptive analysis. First, semi-structured interviews with 42 key informants, including policy makers, legal experts, researchers, and clinicians, identified design priorities using the 5P framework (Purpose, Population, People, Process, and Patterns). Second, policy documents and implementation guidelines from Phases 1-4 were reviewed to trace the program's evolution.

Results: Stakeholders emphasized that the primary objectives of HBPC should be to support aging in place, preserve functional ability, and reduce avoidable medical expenditures. Stakeholders supported gradually expanding the target population. However, a central point of contention involved whether to lower provider eligibility thresholds to increase scalability or raise them to ensure service quality. Document analysis revealed that revisions across Phases 1-4 expanded eligibility for recipients and providers and reduced coinsurance rates, thereby improving accessibility. Nonetheless, interdisciplinary training and a comprehensive performance evaluation framework remain in early stages.

Discussion and implications: Integrating stakeholder perspectives into policy design grounds HBPC development in practical experience. These findings underscore HBPC's potential in supporting aging in place among high-need, vulnerable populations and inform the development of inclusive, adaptable community-based care models.

从设计到实施:韩国家庭初级保健的政策演变。
背景和目标:韩国老年人口的迅速扩大,以及不断增长的健康和社会护理需求,产生了对以家庭为基础的初级保健(HBPC)的迫切需求。本研究确定了韩国HBPC模式的关键设计优先事项,并考察了它们在国家试点中的反映。研究设计和方法:本研究旨在作为韩国HBPC试点项目发展和实施的案例研究,采用双方法方法进行描述性分析。首先,对42位关键信息提供者(包括政策制定者、法律专家、研究人员和临床医生)进行半结构化访谈,使用5P框架(目的、人口、人员、流程和模式)确定设计优先级。其次,回顾了第1-4阶段的政策文件和实施指南,以跟踪项目的演变。结果:利益相关者强调HBPC的主要目标应该是支持老龄化,保持功能能力,减少可避免的医疗支出。利益相关者支持逐步扩大目标人群。然而,争论的中心点涉及是降低提供者资格阈值以增加可伸缩性,还是提高它们以确保服务质量。文件分析显示,第1-4阶段的修订扩大了接受者和提供者的资格,降低了共同保险费率,从而改善了可及性。尽管如此,跨学科培训和综合业绩评价框架仍处于初级阶段。讨论和启示:将利益相关者的观点纳入政策设计,为HBPC的发展奠定了实践经验的基础。这些发现强调了HBPC在支持高需求弱势人群就地老龄化方面的潜力,并为制定包容性、适应性强的社区护理模式提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书