Geopolitical Risk and Bank Stability in the MENA Region: The Moderating Role of Diversification and Financial Flexibility

IF 3.7 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
International Journal of Finance & Economics Pub Date : 2026-10-07 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI:10.1002/ijfe.70165
Dexiang Wu, Ahmed Rashed, Ahmed A. Elamer
{"title":"Geopolitical Risk and Bank Stability in the MENA Region: The Moderating Role of Diversification and Financial Flexibility","authors":"Dexiang Wu,&nbsp;Ahmed Rashed,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Elamer","doi":"10.1002/ijfe.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We investigate the impact of geopolitical risk on bank stability in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. We further examine how internal strategic factors—namely, bank diversification and financial flexibility—moderate this relationship, potentially serving as buffers against external political shocks. Using a balanced panel of 107 listed MENA banks from 2007 to 2023, comprising 1819 bank-year observations, we employ panel corrected standard error (PCSE) and robustness checks. It utilises both accounting-based (Z-score and NPL) and market-based (distance-to-default and long-term earnings volatility) indicators of bank stability. We incorporate the Caldara and IacovielloGeopolitical Risk Index and its growth rate to capture both level and momentum effects of geopolitical risks. The findings demonstrate a statistically significant negative relationship between geopolitical risk and bank stability. However, banks with higher levels of diversification and financial flexibility are more resilient to geopolitical shocks, highlighting their moderating role in turbulent geopolitical environments. We further conduct additional tests showing that asset diversification partially and complementarily mediates the adverse effect of geopolitical risk on bank stability. Robustness analyses reveal that strong institutional governance provides critical buffers that enable banks to absorb geopolitical shocks and sustain financial stability. Moreover, crisis-specific tests indicate that global and regional shocks (e.g., global financial crisis, Arab Spring, COVID-19 and Russia–Ukraine War) significantly intensify the negative GPR–stability relationship. Geopolitical risk erodes bank stability, particularly in weakly governed and resource-dependent economies, highlighting banks' heterogeneous vulnerability to external shocks. This paper emphasises the importance of internal strategic buffers in regions prone to political volatility and provides actionable insights for bank executives, regulators and policymakers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47461,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Finance & Economics","volume":"31 4","pages":"4757-4788"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Finance & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijfe.70165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the impact of geopolitical risk on bank stability in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. We further examine how internal strategic factors—namely, bank diversification and financial flexibility—moderate this relationship, potentially serving as buffers against external political shocks. Using a balanced panel of 107 listed MENA banks from 2007 to 2023, comprising 1819 bank-year observations, we employ panel corrected standard error (PCSE) and robustness checks. It utilises both accounting-based (Z-score and NPL) and market-based (distance-to-default and long-term earnings volatility) indicators of bank stability. We incorporate the Caldara and IacovielloGeopolitical Risk Index and its growth rate to capture both level and momentum effects of geopolitical risks. The findings demonstrate a statistically significant negative relationship between geopolitical risk and bank stability. However, banks with higher levels of diversification and financial flexibility are more resilient to geopolitical shocks, highlighting their moderating role in turbulent geopolitical environments. We further conduct additional tests showing that asset diversification partially and complementarily mediates the adverse effect of geopolitical risk on bank stability. Robustness analyses reveal that strong institutional governance provides critical buffers that enable banks to absorb geopolitical shocks and sustain financial stability. Moreover, crisis-specific tests indicate that global and regional shocks (e.g., global financial crisis, Arab Spring, COVID-19 and Russia–Ukraine War) significantly intensify the negative GPR–stability relationship. Geopolitical risk erodes bank stability, particularly in weakly governed and resource-dependent economies, highlighting banks' heterogeneous vulnerability to external shocks. This paper emphasises the importance of internal strategic buffers in regions prone to political volatility and provides actionable insights for bank executives, regulators and policymakers.

中东和北非地区地缘政治风险与银行稳定性:多元化和金融灵活性的调节作用
我们研究了地缘政治风险对中东和北非(MENA)地区银行稳定性的影响。我们进一步研究了内部战略因素——即银行多元化和财务灵活性——如何调节这种关系,从而可能成为抵御外部政治冲击的缓冲。使用2007年至2023年107家MENA上市银行的平衡面板,包括1819个银行年度观察结果,我们采用面板修正标准误差(PCSE)和稳健性检查。它利用了基于会计的(Z-score和不良贷款)和基于市场的(违约距离和长期收益波动)银行稳定性指标。我们结合Caldara和iacoviello地缘政治风险指数及其增长率来捕捉地缘政治风险的水平效应和动量效应。研究结果表明,地缘政治风险与银行稳定性之间存在显著的负相关关系。然而,具有较高多元化水平和财务灵活性的银行对地缘政治冲击的抵御能力更强,这凸显了它们在动荡的地缘政治环境中的调节作用。我们进一步进行了额外的测试,表明资产多元化部分和互补地调节了地缘政治风险对银行稳定性的不利影响。稳健性分析显示,强有力的机构治理提供了关键缓冲,使银行能够吸收地缘政治冲击并维持金融稳定。此外,针对危机的测试表明,全球和区域冲击(如全球金融危机、阿拉伯之春、2019冠状病毒病和俄乌战争)显著加剧了gpr与稳定的负相关关系。地缘政治风险会侵蚀银行的稳定性,尤其是在治理薄弱、依赖资源的经济体,凸显出银行对外部冲击的异质性脆弱性。本文强调了内部战略缓冲在容易发生政治动荡地区的重要性,并为银行高管、监管机构和政策制定者提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
143
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书