Anne Lívia Cavalcante Mota MSc, Isadora Marques Barbosa PhD, Paulo César de Almeida PhD
{"title":"Communication of difficult news in pediatric oncology: Content validity evidence of a clinical simulation scenario","authors":"Anne Lívia Cavalcante Mota MSc, Isadora Marques Barbosa PhD, Paulo César de Almeida PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2026.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Communicating difficult news in pediatric oncology is complex and emotionally demanding. Clinical simulation effectively supports communication skills development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A descriptive study was conducted to construct a pediatric oncology clinical simulation scenario focused on communicating difficult news and to identify evidence of content validity, based on the SPIKES protocol and the NLN/Jeffries Simulation Theory. Content validation was performed by seven nursing experts. Descriptive analysis, Content Validity Index (I-CVI), and Cronbach’s alpha were applied to the scenario evaluation instrument (21 items) and the checklist of expected actions used to assess performance (8 items).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most items of the scenario evaluation instrument (21 items) achieved I-CVI ≥ 0.80 (CVI-AVE = 0.89), with high internal consistency (α = 0.887). Items below this threshold were refined based on experts' qualitative feedback to ensure validity. The checklist of expected actions (8 items) showed I-CVI values ranging from 0.86 to 1.00 (overall = 0.97).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The scenario demonstrated evidence of content validity and internal consistency, supporting its use in nursing education for teaching communication of difficult news in pediatric oncology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"21 4","pages":"Pages e1692-e1697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155730872600209X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Communicating difficult news in pediatric oncology is complex and emotionally demanding. Clinical simulation effectively supports communication skills development.
Methods
A descriptive study was conducted to construct a pediatric oncology clinical simulation scenario focused on communicating difficult news and to identify evidence of content validity, based on the SPIKES protocol and the NLN/Jeffries Simulation Theory. Content validation was performed by seven nursing experts. Descriptive analysis, Content Validity Index (I-CVI), and Cronbach’s alpha were applied to the scenario evaluation instrument (21 items) and the checklist of expected actions used to assess performance (8 items).
Results
Most items of the scenario evaluation instrument (21 items) achieved I-CVI ≥ 0.80 (CVI-AVE = 0.89), with high internal consistency (α = 0.887). Items below this threshold were refined based on experts' qualitative feedback to ensure validity. The checklist of expected actions (8 items) showed I-CVI values ranging from 0.86 to 1.00 (overall = 0.97).
Conclusion
The scenario demonstrated evidence of content validity and internal consistency, supporting its use in nursing education for teaching communication of difficult news in pediatric oncology.
期刊介绍:
Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty