Anticipatory thinking in nursing students: a concept analysis

IF 2.5 Q2 NURSING
Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2026.05.032
John Paulo C. Pineda RN, MN, Annabelle Nacpil RN, MAN, Jeffrey Esteron RN, PhD
{"title":"Anticipatory thinking in nursing students: a concept analysis","authors":"John Paulo C. Pineda RN, MN,&nbsp;Annabelle Nacpil RN, MAN,&nbsp;Jeffrey Esteron RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2026.05.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anticipatory thinking, the ability to predict and prepare for future clinical events, remains underdeveloped in nursing education despite its relevance to patient safety and clinical competence.</div></div><div><h3>Major Points</h3><div>This concept analysis, guided by Walker and Avant’s method, clarifies anticipatory thinking in nursing students. The concept is defined by five attributes: future-oriented cognition, predictive clinical judgment, mental simulation, proactive preparedness, and situational projection. Antecedents include cognitive readiness, instructional design, and supportive learning environments, while consequences involve improved clinical performance and patient safety.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Integrating anticipatory thinking into nursing education requires intentional instructional strategies, including simulation, guided reflection, and forward-focused assessment approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Clarifying anticipatory thinking provides a foundation for enhancing proactive clinical judgment and preparing nursing students for complex healthcare environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"21 4","pages":"Pages e1461-e1466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308726001605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Anticipatory thinking, the ability to predict and prepare for future clinical events, remains underdeveloped in nursing education despite its relevance to patient safety and clinical competence.

Major Points

This concept analysis, guided by Walker and Avant’s method, clarifies anticipatory thinking in nursing students. The concept is defined by five attributes: future-oriented cognition, predictive clinical judgment, mental simulation, proactive preparedness, and situational projection. Antecedents include cognitive readiness, instructional design, and supportive learning environments, while consequences involve improved clinical performance and patient safety.

Implications

Integrating anticipatory thinking into nursing education requires intentional instructional strategies, including simulation, guided reflection, and forward-focused assessment approaches.

Conclusions

Clarifying anticipatory thinking provides a foundation for enhancing proactive clinical judgment and preparing nursing students for complex healthcare environments.
护生预期性思维的概念分析
前瞻性思维,即预测和准备未来临床事件的能力,尽管与患者安全和临床能力相关,但在护理教育中仍不发达。这个概念分析在Walker和Avant的方法的指导下,澄清了护理学生的预期思维。该概念由五个属性定义:面向未来的认知、预测性临床判断、心理模拟、主动准备和情境投射。前因包括认知准备、教学设计和支持性学习环境,而后果包括改善临床表现和患者安全。将预见性思维融入护理教育需要有针对性的教学策略,包括模拟、引导反思和前瞻性评估方法。结论明确预见性思维,为提高护理学生的前瞻性临床判断能力和应对复杂医疗环境提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书