Association of Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour with Incident Cardiovascular Disease: The Maastricht Study

Xiangyu Cui,Wenjie Li,Miranda T Schram,Alfons. J. H. M. Houben,Simone J. P. M. Eussen,Anke Wesselius,Hans H. C. M. Savelberg,Bastiaan de Galan,Hans Bosma,Annemarie Koster
{"title":"Association of Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour with Incident Cardiovascular Disease: The Maastricht Study","authors":"Xiangyu Cui,Wenjie Li,Miranda T Schram,Alfons. J. H. M. Houben,Simone J. P. M. Eussen,Anke Wesselius,Hans H. C. M. Savelberg,Bastiaan de Galan,Hans Bosma,Annemarie Koster","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000004170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the associations of volume and pattern of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), and the modifying effects of sociodemographic and health factors. Methods: 5,186 participants (mean age 59.3 years; 52.4% women) were included from The Maastricht Study. PA and SB were obtained with thigh-worn accelerometers. Annual questionnaires and government registration assessed CVD events (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, and/or peripheral vascular disease). Cox regression examined associations and effect modification by age, sex, socioeconomic position, body mass index, mobility limitation, and diabetes. Results: 654 events occurred within a 6.1-year median follow-up (IQR: 3.2-9.1 years). Individuals with >69.8 min/day moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) [HR (95%CI): 0.68 (0.54–0.85)] and >11.9 min/day vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA) [HR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.54–0.87)] had lower CVD risk compared with Q1 (lowest). Moderate sedentary breaks (32.0-42.6 n/day) were associated with a lower risk [Q2, HR (95%CI): 0.75 (0.61–0.92); Q3, HR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.55–0.87)] relative to Q1. Weekend warriors [MVPA ≥ 150 min/week with ≥50% in 1–2 days, HR (95%CI): 0.60 (0.44-0.82)] and regularly active individuals [HR (95%CI): 0.66 (0.50-0.88)] had lower risks relative to inactive/insufficiently active individuals. Stronger associations were observed between MVPA and CVD in women, and in limited-mobility individuals (both P-interaction < 0.05). Sedentary time, light-intensity PA, prolonged sedentary bouts, and average sedentary bout duration were not associated with CVD. Conclusions: Higher MVPA (particularly in women and limited-mobility individuals) and VPA are associated with lower CVD risk. Overall, higher-intensity PA could be relevant for cardiovascular protection.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"172 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000004170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the associations of volume and pattern of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), and the modifying effects of sociodemographic and health factors. Methods: 5,186 participants (mean age 59.3 years; 52.4% women) were included from The Maastricht Study. PA and SB were obtained with thigh-worn accelerometers. Annual questionnaires and government registration assessed CVD events (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, and/or peripheral vascular disease). Cox regression examined associations and effect modification by age, sex, socioeconomic position, body mass index, mobility limitation, and diabetes. Results: 654 events occurred within a 6.1-year median follow-up (IQR: 3.2-9.1 years). Individuals with >69.8 min/day moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) [HR (95%CI): 0.68 (0.54–0.85)] and >11.9 min/day vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA) [HR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.54–0.87)] had lower CVD risk compared with Q1 (lowest). Moderate sedentary breaks (32.0-42.6 n/day) were associated with a lower risk [Q2, HR (95%CI): 0.75 (0.61–0.92); Q3, HR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.55–0.87)] relative to Q1. Weekend warriors [MVPA ≥ 150 min/week with ≥50% in 1–2 days, HR (95%CI): 0.60 (0.44-0.82)] and regularly active individuals [HR (95%CI): 0.66 (0.50-0.88)] had lower risks relative to inactive/insufficiently active individuals. Stronger associations were observed between MVPA and CVD in women, and in limited-mobility individuals (both P-interaction < 0.05). Sedentary time, light-intensity PA, prolonged sedentary bouts, and average sedentary bout duration were not associated with CVD. Conclusions: Higher MVPA (particularly in women and limited-mobility individuals) and VPA are associated with lower CVD risk. Overall, higher-intensity PA could be relevant for cardiovascular protection.
加速度计测量的身体活动和久坐行为与心血管疾病的关联:马斯特里赫特研究
目的:探讨体力活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)与心血管疾病(CVD)发生的关系,以及社会人口和健康因素的调节作用。方法:从马斯特里赫特研究中纳入5186名参与者(平均年龄59.3岁,52.4%为女性)。PA和SB通过穿戴式加速度计测量。年度问卷调查和政府登记评估CVD事件(心肌梗死、脑血管疾病和/或周围血管疾病)。Cox回归检验了年龄、性别、社会经济地位、身体质量指数、活动能力限制和糖尿病的相关性和效果改变。结果:在6.1年的中位随访(IQR: 3.2-9.1年)中发生了654例事件。与Q1相比,69.8分钟/天的中高强度体力活动(MVPA) [HR (95%CI): 0.68(0.54-0.85)]和11.9分钟/天的高强度体力活动(VPA) [HR (95%CI): 0.69(0.54-0.87)]的个体心血管疾病风险较低(最低)。中度久坐休息(32.0-42.6 n/天)与较低的风险相关[Q2, HR (95%CI): 0.75 (0.61-0.92);Q3,相对于Q1, HR (95%CI): 0.69(0.55-0.87)。周末战士[MVPA≥150分钟/周,1-2天内≥50%,HR (95%CI): 0.60(0.44-0.82)]和经常运动的个体[HR (95%CI): 0.66(0.50-0.88)]相对于不运动/不充分运动的个体风险较低。MVPA与CVD在女性和行动受限个体中存在更强的相关性(p -相互作用<; 0.05)。久坐时间、低强度PA、久坐发作时间延长和平均久坐发作时间与CVD无关。结论:较高的MVPA(特别是女性和行动不便的个体)和VPA与较低的CVD风险相关。总的来说,高强度PA可能与心血管保护有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书