Effects of 10, 90, 120 and 150 G.H -1 CHO on Substrate Metabolism, Exogenous Oxidation and Exercise Capacity: Implications for CHO Personalization

Henry J. Martyn,Javier T. Gonzalez,Trent Stellingwerff,Louise M. Burke,Daniel J. Owens,Jamie N. Pugh,James P. Morton
{"title":"Effects of 10, 90, 120 and 150 G.H -1 CHO on Substrate Metabolism, Exogenous Oxidation and Exercise Capacity: Implications for CHO Personalization","authors":"Henry J. Martyn,Javier T. Gonzalez,Trent Stellingwerff,Louise M. Burke,Daniel J. Owens,Jamie N. Pugh,James P. Morton","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000004176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Given recent controversy surrounding the optimal CHO intake during exercise, we assessed the effects of CHO ingestion at rates of 10, 90, 120 and 150 g.h -1 on substrate metabolism and exercise capacity. Methods: Eight trained males cycled for 3 hours, followed by an exercise capacity test (150% lactate threshold). Participants completed an initial familiarization comprising 10 g.h -1 (maltodextrin) with subsequent trials randomized (90, 120 and 150 g.h -1 : 1:0.8 ratio of maltodextrin to fructose drinks enriched with [U 13 -C] glucose-fructose). Results: Mean exogenous CHO oxidation increased in a dose dependent manner where 150 > 120 > 90 g.h -1 (1.62 ± 0.45; 1.48 ± 0.44; 1.23 ± 0.35 g.min -1 , respectively, all P<0.05), though substantial variation was observed within trials (range of 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 g.min -1 for 90, 120 and 150 g.h -1 , respectively). Whole-body CHO oxidation did not differ (P=0.97) between 150 and 120 g.h -1 (both trials = 2.6 ± 0.3 g.min -1 ), with both trials greater than 90 and 10 g.h -1 (2.3 ± 0.5; 1.7 ± 0.7 g.min -1 , respectively). Blood glucose was lower in 10 g.h -1 (3.8 ± 0.2, P<0.01) versus 90, 120 and 150 g.h -1 (4.6 ± 0.2, 4.6 ± 0.1, 4.8 ± 0.2 mmol.L -1 ; P>0.05 between higher doses). Total exercise duration was lower in 10 g.h -1 (2:41:28 ± 0:24:47 h:min:secs,) versus 90 (3:04:59 ± 0:01:52), 120 (3:05:24 ± 0:03:28, both P<0.05) and 150 g.h -1 (3:00:39 ± 0:07:00, P=0.06), with no differences (P>0.05) between higher rates. Optimal exercise capacity was achieved with 107 g.h -1 (95 % CI: 92-122 g.h -1 ) Conclusions: Data demonstrate 150 g.h -1 does not increase whole-body CHO oxidation versus 120 g.h -1 , though variations in ergogenic dose and exogenous CHO oxidation rates support CHO personalization.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000004176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Given recent controversy surrounding the optimal CHO intake during exercise, we assessed the effects of CHO ingestion at rates of 10, 90, 120 and 150 g.h -1 on substrate metabolism and exercise capacity. Methods: Eight trained males cycled for 3 hours, followed by an exercise capacity test (150% lactate threshold). Participants completed an initial familiarization comprising 10 g.h -1 (maltodextrin) with subsequent trials randomized (90, 120 and 150 g.h -1 : 1:0.8 ratio of maltodextrin to fructose drinks enriched with [U 13 -C] glucose-fructose). Results: Mean exogenous CHO oxidation increased in a dose dependent manner where 150 > 120 > 90 g.h -1 (1.62 ± 0.45; 1.48 ± 0.44; 1.23 ± 0.35 g.min -1 , respectively, all P<0.05), though substantial variation was observed within trials (range of 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 g.min -1 for 90, 120 and 150 g.h -1 , respectively). Whole-body CHO oxidation did not differ (P=0.97) between 150 and 120 g.h -1 (both trials = 2.6 ± 0.3 g.min -1 ), with both trials greater than 90 and 10 g.h -1 (2.3 ± 0.5; 1.7 ± 0.7 g.min -1 , respectively). Blood glucose was lower in 10 g.h -1 (3.8 ± 0.2, P<0.01) versus 90, 120 and 150 g.h -1 (4.6 ± 0.2, 4.6 ± 0.1, 4.8 ± 0.2 mmol.L -1 ; P>0.05 between higher doses). Total exercise duration was lower in 10 g.h -1 (2:41:28 ± 0:24:47 h:min:secs,) versus 90 (3:04:59 ± 0:01:52), 120 (3:05:24 ± 0:03:28, both P<0.05) and 150 g.h -1 (3:00:39 ± 0:07:00, P=0.06), with no differences (P>0.05) between higher rates. Optimal exercise capacity was achieved with 107 g.h -1 (95 % CI: 92-122 g.h -1 ) Conclusions: Data demonstrate 150 g.h -1 does not increase whole-body CHO oxidation versus 120 g.h -1 , though variations in ergogenic dose and exogenous CHO oxidation rates support CHO personalization.
10、90、120和150 G.H -1 CHO对底物代谢、外源性氧化和运动能力的影响:对CHO个性化的影响
目的:考虑到最近围绕运动中CHO最佳摄入量的争议,我们评估了以10、90、120和150 g.h -1的速率摄入CHO对底物代谢和运动能力的影响。方法:8名经过训练的男性进行3小时的自行车运动,随后进行运动能力测试(150%乳酸阈值)。参与者完成了包括10 g.h -1(麦芽糖糊精)的初始熟悉,随后的随机试验(90、120和150 g.h -1: 1:0.8比例的麦芽糖糊精与富含[U 13 -C]葡萄糖-果糖的果糖饮料)。结果:平均外源性CHO氧化呈剂量依赖性增加,150 > 120 > 90 g.h -1(1.62±0.45;1.48±0.44;1.23±0.35 g)。min -1,所有P<;0.05),尽管在试验中观察到实质性变化(0.3,0.6和0.9 g范围)。Min -1分别为90、120和150 g.h -1)。在150和120 g.h -1期间,全身CHO氧化无差异(P=0.97)(两项试验均= 2.6±0.3 g)。Min -1),两项试验均大于90和10 g.h -1(2.3±0.5;1.7±0.7 g)。分别为Min -1)。10 g.h -1组血糖较90、120、150 g.h -1组(4.6±0.2、4.6±0.1、4.8±0.2 mmol)降低(3.8±0.2,P<0.01)。L -1;高剂量之间P>;0.05)。总运动时间10 g.h -1(2:41:28±0:24:47 h:min:secs,)低于90(3:04:59±0:01:52)、120(3:05:24±0:03:28,P= 0.05)和150 g.h -1(3:00:39±0:07:00,P=0.06),两者之间无差异(P>0.05)。结论:数据表明,与120 g.h -1相比,150 g.h -1不会增加全身CHO氧化,尽管人体负荷剂量和外源性CHO氧化率的变化支持CHO个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书