Effects of Real-Time Visual Feedback on Performance and Motivation in Recreational Swimmers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dan Eisenhardt,Aidan Kits,Pascal Madeleine,Afshin Samani,David C. Clarke,Mathias Kristiansen
{"title":"Effects of Real-Time Visual Feedback on Performance and Motivation in Recreational Swimmers: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Dan Eisenhardt,Aidan Kits,Pascal Madeleine,Afshin Samani,David C. Clarke,Mathias Kristiansen","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000004165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Real-time feedback technologies are increasingly used in endurance training. We previously showed that feedback increased compliance to prescribed training by fitness swimmers, yet their effects on long-term performance adaptations and motivation remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated the extent to which real-time visual feedback during swim training improves performance and motivation among recreational swimmers. Methods: Fifty-seven participants were randomized into a feedback (FB) or non-feedback (NFB) group and were prescribed 35 workouts over 12 weeks across three training volumes (small, medium, large). The FB group used FORM Goggles to receive real-time visual feedback, whereas the NFB group completed identical workouts without feedback. Performance was assessed as the change in critical swim speed (CSS) from baseline to post-intervention, and motivation was evaluated using post-workout Likert-scale surveys assessing accomplishment, enjoyment, and intention to continue training. Results: Linear mixed-effects models revealed significant improvements in CSS over time (p < 0.001), with mean relative improvements of 6.8% in the FB group and 6.3% in the NFB group; however, there was no between-group difference (p = 0.75; Cohen’s d = 0.08). Motivation scores remained high throughout the intervention in both groups, with no significant effects of feedback or group-by-training plan interactions (all p > 0.16). Conclusions: Real-time visual feedback did not lead to greater improvements in CSS or motivation compared with non-feedback training during a 12-week structured swim training program. These findings suggest that, under the conditions tested, prescribed training volume and intensity were the primary drivers of adaptation, with no additional measurable benefit from real-time visual feedback.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000004165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Real-time feedback technologies are increasingly used in endurance training. We previously showed that feedback increased compliance to prescribed training by fitness swimmers, yet their effects on long-term performance adaptations and motivation remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated the extent to which real-time visual feedback during swim training improves performance and motivation among recreational swimmers. Methods: Fifty-seven participants were randomized into a feedback (FB) or non-feedback (NFB) group and were prescribed 35 workouts over 12 weeks across three training volumes (small, medium, large). The FB group used FORM Goggles to receive real-time visual feedback, whereas the NFB group completed identical workouts without feedback. Performance was assessed as the change in critical swim speed (CSS) from baseline to post-intervention, and motivation was evaluated using post-workout Likert-scale surveys assessing accomplishment, enjoyment, and intention to continue training. Results: Linear mixed-effects models revealed significant improvements in CSS over time (p < 0.001), with mean relative improvements of 6.8% in the FB group and 6.3% in the NFB group; however, there was no between-group difference (p = 0.75; Cohen’s d = 0.08). Motivation scores remained high throughout the intervention in both groups, with no significant effects of feedback or group-by-training plan interactions (all p > 0.16). Conclusions: Real-time visual feedback did not lead to greater improvements in CSS or motivation compared with non-feedback training during a 12-week structured swim training program. These findings suggest that, under the conditions tested, prescribed training volume and intensity were the primary drivers of adaptation, with no additional measurable benefit from real-time visual feedback.
实时视觉反馈对休闲游泳运动员运动表现和动机的影响:一项随机对照试验
实时反馈技术在耐力训练中的应用越来越广泛。我们之前的研究表明,反馈增加了健身游泳者对规定训练的依从性,但它们对长期表现适应和动机的影响尚不清楚。这项随机对照试验调查了游泳训练中实时视觉反馈在多大程度上提高了休闲游泳者的表现和动力。方法:57名参与者被随机分为反馈组(FB)或非反馈组(NFB),并在12周内按3种训练量(小、中、大)进行35次训练。FB组使用FORM Goggles接收实时视觉反馈,而NFB组在没有反馈的情况下完成相同的训练。以临界游泳速度(CSS)从基线到干预后的变化来评估表现,并使用运动后李克特量表调查评估成就,享受和继续训练的意愿来评估动机。结果:线性混合效应模型显示,随着时间的推移,CSS显著改善(p < 0.001), FB组平均相对改善6.8%,NFB组平均相对改善6.3%;然而,组间无差异(p = 0.75; Cohen’s d = 0.08)。在整个干预过程中,两组的动机得分都很高,反馈或组与训练计划的互动没有显著影响(均p >; 0.16)。结论:在为期12周的结构化游泳训练计划中,与非反馈训练相比,实时视觉反馈并没有导致CSS或动机的更大改善。这些发现表明,在测试条件下,规定的训练量和强度是适应的主要驱动因素,实时视觉反馈没有额外的可测量的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书