Nima Karimitari, Jacob Clary, Derek Vigil-Fowler, Ravishankar Sundararaman, Gábor Csányi, Christopher Sutton
{"title":"Systematic fine-tuning of MACE interatomic potentials for catalysis","authors":"Nima Karimitari, Jacob Clary, Derek Vigil-Fowler, Ravishankar Sundararaman, Gábor Csányi, Christopher Sutton","doi":"10.1038/s41524-026-02335-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Once trained, machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) offer a fast and accurate way to investigate catalytic reaction pathways, but their performance depends strongly on training-set design. We compared nine MLIPs developed using from-scratch (FS) training and fine-tuning (FT) of foundation models. The models were evaluated on reaction energies (Er) and activation barriers (Ea) for 141 reactions, including CO2RR to C2/C3 products, propane dehydrogenation, hydrogen intercalation on Pd, and out-of-distribution OER on metal oxides. The FS models containing 5–10% perturbed, high-energy configurations from molecular dynamics or contour exploration reduced errors by more than twofold relative to models trained only on relaxation trajectories. However, FT models were less sensitive to sampling and generalized better to out-of-distribution chemistry. For example, the FT model fine-tuned on metallic catalysts achieved an MAE of 0.30 eV for OER on iridium oxide polymorphs, while the FT model fine-tuned on metal-oxides gave an Ea of 0.19 eV for CO2RR on Cu. The best model, fine-tuned on 49,860 configurations, performed consistently across metallic and oxide catalysts and screened 90,781 bimetallic alloys with a reaction-energy MAE of 0.15 eV, including unseen high-index surfaces. These results identify the necessary training set configurations for training transferable catalytic MLIPs.","PeriodicalId":19342,"journal":{"name":"npj Computational Materials","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Computational Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-026-02335-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Once trained, machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) offer a fast and accurate way to investigate catalytic reaction pathways, but their performance depends strongly on training-set design. We compared nine MLIPs developed using from-scratch (FS) training and fine-tuning (FT) of foundation models. The models were evaluated on reaction energies (Er) and activation barriers (Ea) for 141 reactions, including CO2RR to C2/C3 products, propane dehydrogenation, hydrogen intercalation on Pd, and out-of-distribution OER on metal oxides. The FS models containing 5–10% perturbed, high-energy configurations from molecular dynamics or contour exploration reduced errors by more than twofold relative to models trained only on relaxation trajectories. However, FT models were less sensitive to sampling and generalized better to out-of-distribution chemistry. For example, the FT model fine-tuned on metallic catalysts achieved an MAE of 0.30 eV for OER on iridium oxide polymorphs, while the FT model fine-tuned on metal-oxides gave an Ea of 0.19 eV for CO2RR on Cu. The best model, fine-tuned on 49,860 configurations, performed consistently across metallic and oxide catalysts and screened 90,781 bimetallic alloys with a reaction-energy MAE of 0.15 eV, including unseen high-index surfaces. These results identify the necessary training set configurations for training transferable catalytic MLIPs.
期刊介绍:
npj Computational Materials is a high-quality open access journal from Nature Research that publishes research papers applying computational approaches for the design of new materials and enhancing our understanding of existing ones. The journal also welcomes papers on new computational techniques and the refinement of current approaches that support these aims, as well as experimental papers that complement computational findings.
Some key features of npj Computational Materials include a 2-year impact factor of 12.241 (2021), article downloads of 1,138,590 (2021), and a fast turnaround time of 11 days from submission to the first editorial decision. The journal is indexed in various databases and services, including Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Astrophysics Data System (ADS), Current Contents/Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, SCOPUS, EI Compendex, INSPEC, Google Scholar, SCImago, DOAJ, CNKI, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), among others.