Systematic fine-tuning of MACE interatomic potentials for catalysis

IF 13.1 1区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Nima Karimitari, Jacob Clary, Derek Vigil-Fowler, Ravishankar Sundararaman, Gábor Csányi, Christopher Sutton
{"title":"Systematic fine-tuning of MACE interatomic potentials for catalysis","authors":"Nima Karimitari, Jacob Clary, Derek Vigil-Fowler, Ravishankar Sundararaman, Gábor Csányi, Christopher Sutton","doi":"10.1038/s41524-026-02335-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Once trained, machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) offer a fast and accurate way to investigate catalytic reaction pathways, but their performance depends strongly on training-set design. We compared nine MLIPs developed using from-scratch (FS) training and fine-tuning (FT) of foundation models. The models were evaluated on reaction energies (Er) and activation barriers (Ea) for 141 reactions, including CO2RR to C2/C3 products, propane dehydrogenation, hydrogen intercalation on Pd, and out-of-distribution OER on metal oxides. The FS models containing 5–10% perturbed, high-energy configurations from molecular dynamics or contour exploration reduced errors by more than twofold relative to models trained only on relaxation trajectories. However, FT models were less sensitive to sampling and generalized better to out-of-distribution chemistry. For example, the FT model fine-tuned on metallic catalysts achieved an MAE of 0.30 eV for OER on iridium oxide polymorphs, while the FT model fine-tuned on metal-oxides gave an Ea of 0.19 eV for CO2RR on Cu. The best model, fine-tuned on 49,860 configurations, performed consistently across metallic and oxide catalysts and screened 90,781 bimetallic alloys with a reaction-energy MAE of 0.15 eV, including unseen high-index surfaces. These results identify the necessary training set configurations for training transferable catalytic MLIPs.","PeriodicalId":19342,"journal":{"name":"npj Computational Materials","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Computational Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-026-02335-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Once trained, machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) offer a fast and accurate way to investigate catalytic reaction pathways, but their performance depends strongly on training-set design. We compared nine MLIPs developed using from-scratch (FS) training and fine-tuning (FT) of foundation models. The models were evaluated on reaction energies (Er) and activation barriers (Ea) for 141 reactions, including CO2RR to C2/C3 products, propane dehydrogenation, hydrogen intercalation on Pd, and out-of-distribution OER on metal oxides. The FS models containing 5–10% perturbed, high-energy configurations from molecular dynamics or contour exploration reduced errors by more than twofold relative to models trained only on relaxation trajectories. However, FT models were less sensitive to sampling and generalized better to out-of-distribution chemistry. For example, the FT model fine-tuned on metallic catalysts achieved an MAE of 0.30 eV for OER on iridium oxide polymorphs, while the FT model fine-tuned on metal-oxides gave an Ea of 0.19 eV for CO2RR on Cu. The best model, fine-tuned on 49,860 configurations, performed consistently across metallic and oxide catalysts and screened 90,781 bimetallic alloys with a reaction-energy MAE of 0.15 eV, including unseen high-index surfaces. These results identify the necessary training set configurations for training transferable catalytic MLIPs.
MACE催化原子间电位的系统微调
经过训练后,机器学习原子间势(MLIPs)为研究催化反应途径提供了一种快速、准确的方法,但它们的性能在很大程度上取决于训练集的设计。我们比较了使用基础模型的从头开始(FS)训练和微调(FT)开发的九个mlip。对模型的反应能(Er)和激活势垒(Ea)进行了评价,包括CO2RR生成C2/C3产物、丙烷脱氢、Pd上的氢插入以及金属氧化物上的out- distribution OER等141个反应。FS模型包含5-10%的扰动,来自分子动力学或轮廓勘探的高能构型,相对于仅训练弛豫轨迹的模型,误差减少了两倍以上。然而,FT模型对采样的敏感性较低,对分布外化学的泛化效果较好。例如,在金属催化剂上微调的FT模型对氧化铱多晶的OER的MAE为0.30 eV,而在金属氧化物上微调的FT模型对Cu上的CO2RR的Ea为0.19 eV。最佳模型对49,860种构型进行了微调,在金属和氧化物催化剂中表现一致,并筛选了90,781种双金属合金,反应能MAE为0.15 eV,包括未见过的高折射率表面。这些结果确定了训练可转移催化mlip所需的训练集配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
npj Computational Materials
npj Computational Materials Mathematics-Modeling and Simulation
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
5.20%
发文量
229
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Computational Materials is a high-quality open access journal from Nature Research that publishes research papers applying computational approaches for the design of new materials and enhancing our understanding of existing ones. The journal also welcomes papers on new computational techniques and the refinement of current approaches that support these aims, as well as experimental papers that complement computational findings. Some key features of npj Computational Materials include a 2-year impact factor of 12.241 (2021), article downloads of 1,138,590 (2021), and a fast turnaround time of 11 days from submission to the first editorial decision. The journal is indexed in various databases and services, including Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Astrophysics Data System (ADS), Current Contents/Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, SCOPUS, EI Compendex, INSPEC, Google Scholar, SCImago, DOAJ, CNKI, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书