Telemedical communication patterns in myasthenia gravis in a remote monitoring study.

IF 4 Q2 Medicine
Meret Herdick, Sophie Lehnerer, Maximilian Mönch, Lea Gerischer, Haoqi Sun, Pushpa Narayanaswami, Andreas Meisel, Maike Stein
{"title":"Telemedical communication patterns in myasthenia gravis in a remote monitoring study.","authors":"Meret Herdick, Sophie Lehnerer, Maximilian Mönch, Lea Gerischer, Haoqi Sun, Pushpa Narayanaswami, Andreas Meisel, Maike Stein","doi":"10.1186/s42466-026-00535-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular disease. In-person appointments in specialized centers are not readily available, especially on short notice. The purpose of this study was to analyze patient-specialist communication through a telemedical platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized controlled study 45 MG patients were observed over three months. The intervention group (N = 30) was monitored via a mobile application ('app') that enabled chat function and assessed MG -specific outcome measures and data from external devices. We quantitatively evaluated communication patterns for patients and specialists from the chat. Controls (N = 15) received standard of care. Perceived MG specialist accessibility and contact with physicians outside the study team regarding MG-related issues was assessed in both groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, MG specialists were contacted a median of six times per patient via the chat, most commonly regarding medical issues (151, 54.5%), followed by technical (70, 25.3%), organizational (53, 19.1%), and other (3, 1.1%) topics. Specialists initiated contact a median of eight times per patient, most frequently addressing medical concerns (190, 49.4%), 38.4% of which were recommendations for medication changes. Specialists also addressed technical (154, 40.0%), organizational (36, 9.4%) and other (5, 1.3%) issues. Contacts with physicians outside the study team did not differ between groups. Perceived specialist accessibility was rated higher with telemedical support by the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MG patients have a notable demand for timely advice especially concerning treatment recommendations. Future studies should evaluate the potential of telemedical solutions to prevent worsening of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered under DRKS00029907 on August 19, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-026-00535-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular disease. In-person appointments in specialized centers are not readily available, especially on short notice. The purpose of this study was to analyze patient-specialist communication through a telemedical platform.

Methods: In a randomized controlled study 45 MG patients were observed over three months. The intervention group (N = 30) was monitored via a mobile application ('app') that enabled chat function and assessed MG -specific outcome measures and data from external devices. We quantitatively evaluated communication patterns for patients and specialists from the chat. Controls (N = 15) received standard of care. Perceived MG specialist accessibility and contact with physicians outside the study team regarding MG-related issues was assessed in both groups.

Findings: In total, MG specialists were contacted a median of six times per patient via the chat, most commonly regarding medical issues (151, 54.5%), followed by technical (70, 25.3%), organizational (53, 19.1%), and other (3, 1.1%) topics. Specialists initiated contact a median of eight times per patient, most frequently addressing medical concerns (190, 49.4%), 38.4% of which were recommendations for medication changes. Specialists also addressed technical (154, 40.0%), organizational (36, 9.4%) and other (5, 1.3%) issues. Contacts with physicians outside the study team did not differ between groups. Perceived specialist accessibility was rated higher with telemedical support by the intervention group.

Conclusion: MG patients have a notable demand for timely advice especially concerning treatment recommendations. Future studies should evaluate the potential of telemedical solutions to prevent worsening of symptoms.

Trial registration: The study was registered under DRKS00029907 on August 19, 2022.

重症肌无力的远程医疗通信模式的远程监测研究。
目的:重症肌无力是一种罕见的神经肌肉疾病。在专业中心的亲自预约并不容易,特别是在短时间内。本研究的目的是分析透过远程医疗平台的医患沟通。方法:在一项随机对照研究中,对45例MG患者进行了为期3个月的观察。干预组(N = 30)通过启用聊天功能的移动应用程序(“app”)进行监测,并评估MG特异性结果测量和来自外部设备的数据。我们从聊天中定量评估了患者和专家的沟通模式。对照组(N = 15)接受标准护理。评估两组患者对MG专家的可及性以及与研究小组外的医生就MG相关问题的接触情况。研究结果:总体而言,每位患者通过聊天联系MG专家的中位数为6次,最常见的是关于医疗问题(151,54.5%),其次是技术问题(70,25.3%),组织问题(53,19.1%)和其他问题(3,1.1%)。专家主动联系每位患者的平均次数为8次,最常见的是解决医疗问题(190次,49.4%),其中38.4%是建议更换药物。专家们还讨论了技术(154,40.0%)、组织(36,9.4%)和其他(5,1.3%)问题。与研究小组以外的医生的联系在两组之间没有差异。在远程医疗支持的干预组中,感知专家可及性的评分更高。结论:MG患者对及时咨询的需求显著,尤其是治疗建议。未来的研究应评估远程医疗解决方案在防止症状恶化方面的潜力。试验注册:该研究已于2022年8月19日在DRKS00029907号下注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书