Meret Herdick, Sophie Lehnerer, Maximilian Mönch, Lea Gerischer, Haoqi Sun, Pushpa Narayanaswami, Andreas Meisel, Maike Stein
{"title":"Telemedical communication patterns in myasthenia gravis in a remote monitoring study.","authors":"Meret Herdick, Sophie Lehnerer, Maximilian Mönch, Lea Gerischer, Haoqi Sun, Pushpa Narayanaswami, Andreas Meisel, Maike Stein","doi":"10.1186/s42466-026-00535-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular disease. In-person appointments in specialized centers are not readily available, especially on short notice. The purpose of this study was to analyze patient-specialist communication through a telemedical platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized controlled study 45 MG patients were observed over three months. The intervention group (N = 30) was monitored via a mobile application ('app') that enabled chat function and assessed MG -specific outcome measures and data from external devices. We quantitatively evaluated communication patterns for patients and specialists from the chat. Controls (N = 15) received standard of care. Perceived MG specialist accessibility and contact with physicians outside the study team regarding MG-related issues was assessed in both groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, MG specialists were contacted a median of six times per patient via the chat, most commonly regarding medical issues (151, 54.5%), followed by technical (70, 25.3%), organizational (53, 19.1%), and other (3, 1.1%) topics. Specialists initiated contact a median of eight times per patient, most frequently addressing medical concerns (190, 49.4%), 38.4% of which were recommendations for medication changes. Specialists also addressed technical (154, 40.0%), organizational (36, 9.4%) and other (5, 1.3%) issues. Contacts with physicians outside the study team did not differ between groups. Perceived specialist accessibility was rated higher with telemedical support by the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MG patients have a notable demand for timely advice especially concerning treatment recommendations. Future studies should evaluate the potential of telemedical solutions to prevent worsening of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered under DRKS00029907 on August 19, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-026-00535-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular disease. In-person appointments in specialized centers are not readily available, especially on short notice. The purpose of this study was to analyze patient-specialist communication through a telemedical platform.
Methods: In a randomized controlled study 45 MG patients were observed over three months. The intervention group (N = 30) was monitored via a mobile application ('app') that enabled chat function and assessed MG -specific outcome measures and data from external devices. We quantitatively evaluated communication patterns for patients and specialists from the chat. Controls (N = 15) received standard of care. Perceived MG specialist accessibility and contact with physicians outside the study team regarding MG-related issues was assessed in both groups.
Findings: In total, MG specialists were contacted a median of six times per patient via the chat, most commonly regarding medical issues (151, 54.5%), followed by technical (70, 25.3%), organizational (53, 19.1%), and other (3, 1.1%) topics. Specialists initiated contact a median of eight times per patient, most frequently addressing medical concerns (190, 49.4%), 38.4% of which were recommendations for medication changes. Specialists also addressed technical (154, 40.0%), organizational (36, 9.4%) and other (5, 1.3%) issues. Contacts with physicians outside the study team did not differ between groups. Perceived specialist accessibility was rated higher with telemedical support by the intervention group.
Conclusion: MG patients have a notable demand for timely advice especially concerning treatment recommendations. Future studies should evaluate the potential of telemedical solutions to prevent worsening of symptoms.
Trial registration: The study was registered under DRKS00029907 on August 19, 2022.