Impact of Transport Team Simulations: A Qualitative Analysis of Debriefs From the ImPACTS Transport Simulation Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Devin A McKissic, Lauren M Maloney, Daniel J Scherzer, Ranna A Rozenfeld, Jessica J Wall, Ingrid M Anderson, Kamal Abulebda, Erin Montgomery, Christopher Kennedy, Snimarjot Kaur, Robyn Wing, Rachel Umoren
{"title":"Impact of Transport Team Simulations: A Qualitative Analysis of Debriefs From the ImPACTS Transport Simulation Study.","authors":"Devin A McKissic, Lauren M Maloney, Daniel J Scherzer, Ranna A Rozenfeld, Jessica J Wall, Ingrid M Anderson, Kamal Abulebda, Erin Montgomery, Christopher Kennedy, Snimarjot Kaur, Robyn Wing, Rachel Umoren","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An estimated 250,000 children each year are transported between hospitals, with many of these transports performed by pediatric critical care transport teams (PCCTs). The makeup and education of these teams varies widely, and many are incorporating simulation into their training. The purpose of this study was to examine postsimulation debrief sessions to better understand how programs experience PCCT education using simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve transport centers and a total of 78 transport teams nationwide participated in the multicenter Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation (ImPACTS) transport simulation study in which simulation was utilized to measure and compare PCCT performance. Each team went through 3 simulated cases followed by debriefing sessions. Qualitative analysis was conducted on 23 debriefing sessions from 6 centers. A thematic analysis approach using both inductive and deductive techniques was used to identify themes representing elements of practices, thoughts, and beliefs to better understand debriefing approaches used by facilitators and the content of debriefings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified themes in 4 major categories: (1) debriefing process elements (advocacy inquiry, directive feedback, learner self-assessment, shared mental model, and addressing learning objectives); (2) latent safety threats (personnel or staffing, protocol, workspace or environment); (3) response to simulation; and (4) team dynamics. Debriefing process elements reflected how facilitators conducted debriefings, while the remaining categories reflected the content and insights generated during debriefings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation participants found simulation to be realistic and a helpful tool to identify latent safety threats in their work. Simulation facilitators used consistent strategies to meet learning objectives and support learners in processing their simulation experience. Debriefing also provided insights to system-level vulnerabilities, suggesting a role for simulation not only in education, but also as a quality improvement tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An estimated 250,000 children each year are transported between hospitals, with many of these transports performed by pediatric critical care transport teams (PCCTs). The makeup and education of these teams varies widely, and many are incorporating simulation into their training. The purpose of this study was to examine postsimulation debrief sessions to better understand how programs experience PCCT education using simulation.

Methods: Twelve transport centers and a total of 78 transport teams nationwide participated in the multicenter Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation (ImPACTS) transport simulation study in which simulation was utilized to measure and compare PCCT performance. Each team went through 3 simulated cases followed by debriefing sessions. Qualitative analysis was conducted on 23 debriefing sessions from 6 centers. A thematic analysis approach using both inductive and deductive techniques was used to identify themes representing elements of practices, thoughts, and beliefs to better understand debriefing approaches used by facilitators and the content of debriefings.

Results: We identified themes in 4 major categories: (1) debriefing process elements (advocacy inquiry, directive feedback, learner self-assessment, shared mental model, and addressing learning objectives); (2) latent safety threats (personnel or staffing, protocol, workspace or environment); (3) response to simulation; and (4) team dynamics. Debriefing process elements reflected how facilitators conducted debriefings, while the remaining categories reflected the content and insights generated during debriefings.

Conclusions: Simulation participants found simulation to be realistic and a helpful tool to identify latent safety threats in their work. Simulation facilitators used consistent strategies to meet learning objectives and support learners in processing their simulation experience. Debriefing also provided insights to system-level vulnerabilities, suggesting a role for simulation not only in education, but also as a quality improvement tool.

运输团队模拟的影响:来自影响运输模拟研究报告的定性分析。
导读:据估计,每年有25万名儿童在医院之间被转运,其中许多是由儿科重症监护转运小组(pcct)进行的。这些团队的组成和教育各不相同,许多团队都将模拟训练纳入他们的训练中。本研究的目的是检查模拟后的汇报会议,以更好地了解项目如何使用模拟体验PCCT教育。方法:全国共有12个转运中心和78个转运团队参与了多中心通过模拟改善儿科急症护理(impact)转运模拟研究,利用模拟来衡量和比较PCCT的绩效。每个小组都经历了3个模拟案例,然后进行了汇报。对来自6个中心的23次汇报进行定性分析。使用归纳和演绎技术的主题分析方法来确定代表实践、思想和信念元素的主题,以更好地理解主持人使用的述职方法和述职内容。结果:我们确定了4大类主题:(1)汇报过程要素(倡导调查、指示反馈、学习者自我评估、共享心理模型和解决学习目标);(2)潜在的安全威胁(人员或人员配置、协议、工作空间或环境);(3)仿真响应;(4)团队动力。汇报过程要素反映了主持人如何进行汇报,而其余类别则反映了汇报过程中产生的内容和见解。结论:模拟参与者发现模拟是现实的,并且是识别工作中潜在安全威胁的有用工具。模拟促进者使用一致的策略来满足学习目标,并支持学习者处理他们的模拟经验。汇报还提供了对系统级漏洞的见解,表明模拟不仅在教育中发挥作用,而且还可以作为质量改进工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书