{"title":"Determinants of post-surgical well-being among transgender women: Healthcare accessibility, cultural sensitivity, and social support in India.","authors":"Dineshkumar R, Gandhimathi S, Pushpanathan T","doi":"10.1080/26895269.2026.2672732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a vital component of transgender healthcare, yet post-surgical well-being is shaped by more than surgical outcomes alone. Empirical research on post-GAS healthcare experiences in India remains limited despite policy advancements supporting transgender rights.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine healthcare-related and social factors associated with post-surgical well-being among transgender women in Tamil Nadu, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convergent mixed-methods design was employed with 200 community-recruited transgender women who had undergone at least one GAS procedure at least six months prior. Snowball sampling was conducted through community organizations and peer referral networks. Validated Likert-scale instruments (α = .80-.88) assessed healthcare accessibility, perceived quality of care, cultural sensitivity, and social support as predictors of post-surgical well-being. Seven semi-structured interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four predictors were significantly associated with post-surgical well-being (all <i>p</i> < .01): social support (<i>r</i> = .66), cultural sensitivity (<i>r</i> = .64), perceived quality of care (<i>r</i> = .62), and healthcare accessibility (<i>r</i> = .50). The regression model explained 41% of variance (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = .41), with social support (β = .28), perceived quality of care (β = .25), and cultural sensitivity (β = .22) as the strongest predictors. The identified qualitative themes were: bureaucratic vulnerability, linguistic invalidation, spatial exclusion, financial dependency, and chosen-family resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-surgical well-being is shaped by the interplay of structural healthcare accessibility, gender-affirming clinical environments, and community-based support. This study provides contextually grounded evidence from South Asia and highlights the need for culturally competent, inclusive healthcare systems to support equitable recovery outcomes following GAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgender Health","volume":"27 5","pages":"2294-2308"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2026.2672732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a vital component of transgender healthcare, yet post-surgical well-being is shaped by more than surgical outcomes alone. Empirical research on post-GAS healthcare experiences in India remains limited despite policy advancements supporting transgender rights.
Objective: To examine healthcare-related and social factors associated with post-surgical well-being among transgender women in Tamil Nadu, India.
Methods: A convergent mixed-methods design was employed with 200 community-recruited transgender women who had undergone at least one GAS procedure at least six months prior. Snowball sampling was conducted through community organizations and peer referral networks. Validated Likert-scale instruments (α = .80-.88) assessed healthcare accessibility, perceived quality of care, cultural sensitivity, and social support as predictors of post-surgical well-being. Seven semi-structured interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: All four predictors were significantly associated with post-surgical well-being (all p < .01): social support (r = .66), cultural sensitivity (r = .64), perceived quality of care (r = .62), and healthcare accessibility (r = .50). The regression model explained 41% of variance (R2 = .41), with social support (β = .28), perceived quality of care (β = .25), and cultural sensitivity (β = .22) as the strongest predictors. The identified qualitative themes were: bureaucratic vulnerability, linguistic invalidation, spatial exclusion, financial dependency, and chosen-family resilience.
Conclusion: Post-surgical well-being is shaped by the interplay of structural healthcare accessibility, gender-affirming clinical environments, and community-based support. This study provides contextually grounded evidence from South Asia and highlights the need for culturally competent, inclusive healthcare systems to support equitable recovery outcomes following GAS.