"I had this fear that as an autistic person, they would take me less seriously": Trans autistic experiences of epistemic (in)justice in gender-affirming care.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
International Journal of Transgender Health Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26895269.2025.2566190
Kai Jacobsen
{"title":"\"I had this fear that as an autistic person, they would take me less seriously\": Trans autistic experiences of epistemic (in)justice in gender-affirming care.","authors":"Kai Jacobsen","doi":"10.1080/26895269.2025.2566190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A disproportionate number of transgender and nonbinary people are autistic, and research suggests that trans autistic people experience significant barriers and challenges to accessing gender-affirming care. Much of the existing research in this area focuses on determining why trans people are more likely to be autistic, and less research has attended to trans autistic people's lived experiences of accessing gender-affirming care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To better understand these barriers and their impacts, I conducted qualitative interviews with 12 trans autistic people who had recently accessed gender-affirming medical care in the province of Ontario, Canada. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported being frequently not believed, listened to, or taken seriously by healthcare providers, which I conceptualize as instances of epistemic injustice. I identify how medical discourses, ideologies, and clinical guidelines create conditions for gender-affirming care in which trans autistic people experience pervasive epistemic injustice. For example, participants felt pressure to conform to a transnormative and neuronormative narrative in order to be taken seriously by gender-affirming care providers. Some providers misinterpreted autistic communication styles and unfairly discredited their client's knowledge, eroding their trust in health care. While participants used creative self-advocacy strategies to access care, some providers felt threatened by this challenge to their epistemic power and medical authority. Conversely, participants also had positive experiences of epistemic justice when providers took their knowledge and lived experience seriously.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>I argue that gender-affirming care providers must practice epistemic humility by listening deeply and acknowledging the limits of their knowledge to deliver patient-centered care for trans autistic people. Systemic changes to the healthcare system and disrupting transnormativity and neuronormativity are necessary to improve trans autistic people's experiences of gender-affirming care and enable epistemic justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgender Health","volume":"27 5","pages":"2579-2596"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2025.2566190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A disproportionate number of transgender and nonbinary people are autistic, and research suggests that trans autistic people experience significant barriers and challenges to accessing gender-affirming care. Much of the existing research in this area focuses on determining why trans people are more likely to be autistic, and less research has attended to trans autistic people's lived experiences of accessing gender-affirming care.

Methods: To better understand these barriers and their impacts, I conducted qualitative interviews with 12 trans autistic people who had recently accessed gender-affirming medical care in the province of Ontario, Canada. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Participants reported being frequently not believed, listened to, or taken seriously by healthcare providers, which I conceptualize as instances of epistemic injustice. I identify how medical discourses, ideologies, and clinical guidelines create conditions for gender-affirming care in which trans autistic people experience pervasive epistemic injustice. For example, participants felt pressure to conform to a transnormative and neuronormative narrative in order to be taken seriously by gender-affirming care providers. Some providers misinterpreted autistic communication styles and unfairly discredited their client's knowledge, eroding their trust in health care. While participants used creative self-advocacy strategies to access care, some providers felt threatened by this challenge to their epistemic power and medical authority. Conversely, participants also had positive experiences of epistemic justice when providers took their knowledge and lived experience seriously.

Conclusion: I argue that gender-affirming care providers must practice epistemic humility by listening deeply and acknowledging the limits of their knowledge to deliver patient-centered care for trans autistic people. Systemic changes to the healthcare system and disrupting transnormativity and neuronormativity are necessary to improve trans autistic people's experiences of gender-affirming care and enable epistemic justice.

“我担心,作为一个自闭症患者,他们会不那么认真地对待我”:跨性别自闭症患者在性别肯定护理中认识正义的经历。
背景:不成比例的跨性别和非二元性人群患有自闭症,研究表明跨性别自闭症患者在获得性别确认护理方面遇到了重大障碍和挑战。这一领域的现有研究大多集中在确定为什么跨性别者更容易患自闭症,而很少有研究关注跨性别自闭症患者在获得性别肯定护理方面的生活经历。方法:为了更好地理解这些障碍及其影响,我对12名最近在加拿大安大略省接受过性别肯定医疗服务的跨性别自闭症患者进行了定性访谈。访谈采用反身性主题分析。结果:参与者报告经常不被相信,不被倾听,或被医疗保健提供者认真对待,我将其概念化为认知不公正的实例。我确定了医学话语、意识形态和临床指南如何为性别肯定护理创造条件,在这些护理中,跨性别自闭症患者经历了普遍的认知不公正。例如,参与者感到压力,要符合一个跨规范和神经规范的叙述,以便被性别肯定的护理提供者认真对待。一些服务提供者误解了自闭症患者的沟通方式,不公平地诋毁了他们的客户的知识,侵蚀了他们对医疗保健的信任。虽然参与者使用创造性的自我宣传策略来获得护理,但一些提供者感到受到对其认知能力和医疗权威的挑战的威胁。相反,当提供者认真对待他们的知识和生活经验时,参与者也有积极的认识正义体验。结论:我认为,性别确认护理提供者必须通过深入倾听和承认他们的知识的局限性来实践认识上的谦卑,为跨性别自闭症患者提供以患者为中心的护理。医疗保健系统的系统性改变和破坏跨性规范和神经规范对于改善跨性自闭症患者的性别肯定护理体验和实现认知正义是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书