Visualization of changes in relationships among traits over time; example in type traits.

IF 4.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M Misztal, S Tsuruta, I Misztal, J Graham, S Comstock, J Bewley, D Lourenco
{"title":"Visualization of changes in relationships among traits over time; example in type traits.","authors":"M Misztal, S Tsuruta, I Misztal, J Graham, S Comstock, J Bewley, D Lourenco","doi":"10.3168/jds.2026-28881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic evaluations usually include many correlated traits. Their evaluation and use in the selection index rely on genetic parameters that change over time, with these changes potentially accelerating under genomic selection. However, estimating the changes with current methods and large genomic information is computationally prohibitive, and interpreting changes in relationships among many traits is difficult. The purpose of this study is to present a methodology to visualize changes in complex relationships among traits over time. Data included genetic correlations among 18 linear conformation traits of US Holsteins, computed by GPP (Genetic Parameters via Predictivity), for yearly time slices from 2010 to 2020, using all available pedigree, phenotypic, and genomic information. GPP relies on predictivity of adjusted phenotypes from validation population on EBV from reference population and allows estimation by time slices using complete commercial data. In 2010, the reference population included cows born in 2000-2008, and the validation population included cows born in 2009-2011. In subsequent years, the population advanced by one year. Using genetic correlations for the year 2020, each trait was regressed on 2, 3, and 4 remaining conformation (also known as type) traits chosen by the best fit (R<sup>2</sup>). Regression coefficients were then recomputed for the years 2010-2019. Graphs of the coefficients over time for each trait and 2-4 traits in the regression indicated changing relationships among the traits over time. For example, with 2 traits in the regression, fore udder attachment was estimated as a function of udder depth and rear udder width (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84); the addition of stature increased R<sup>2</sup> by 0.03 and adding body depth increased R<sup>2</sup> by an additional 0.04. Biplots of 2 principal components in the 4-trait model indicated that the impact of rear udder width was similar to that of body depth and stature in 2010 but more differentiated in 2020. In general, predictions with 4 traits were less stable. Changes in the dynamics of correlated traits can be visualized by regression coefficients from equations involving 2 to 4 correlated traits and corresponding biplots of the 2 principal components.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2026-28881","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetic evaluations usually include many correlated traits. Their evaluation and use in the selection index rely on genetic parameters that change over time, with these changes potentially accelerating under genomic selection. However, estimating the changes with current methods and large genomic information is computationally prohibitive, and interpreting changes in relationships among many traits is difficult. The purpose of this study is to present a methodology to visualize changes in complex relationships among traits over time. Data included genetic correlations among 18 linear conformation traits of US Holsteins, computed by GPP (Genetic Parameters via Predictivity), for yearly time slices from 2010 to 2020, using all available pedigree, phenotypic, and genomic information. GPP relies on predictivity of adjusted phenotypes from validation population on EBV from reference population and allows estimation by time slices using complete commercial data. In 2010, the reference population included cows born in 2000-2008, and the validation population included cows born in 2009-2011. In subsequent years, the population advanced by one year. Using genetic correlations for the year 2020, each trait was regressed on 2, 3, and 4 remaining conformation (also known as type) traits chosen by the best fit (R2). Regression coefficients were then recomputed for the years 2010-2019. Graphs of the coefficients over time for each trait and 2-4 traits in the regression indicated changing relationships among the traits over time. For example, with 2 traits in the regression, fore udder attachment was estimated as a function of udder depth and rear udder width (R2 = 0.84); the addition of stature increased R2 by 0.03 and adding body depth increased R2 by an additional 0.04. Biplots of 2 principal components in the 4-trait model indicated that the impact of rear udder width was similar to that of body depth and stature in 2010 but more differentiated in 2020. In general, predictions with 4 traits were less stable. Changes in the dynamics of correlated traits can be visualized by regression coefficients from equations involving 2 to 4 correlated traits and corresponding biplots of the 2 principal components.

特征间关系随时间变化的可视化;以类型特征为例。
遗传评估通常包括许多相关性状。它们在选择指数中的评估和使用依赖于随时间变化的遗传参数,这些变化在基因组选择下可能会加速。然而,用目前的方法和大量的基因组信息来估计这些变化在计算上是令人望而却步的,并且解释许多性状之间关系的变化是困难的。本研究的目的是提出一种方法来可视化特征之间复杂关系随时间的变化。数据包括使用所有可用的谱系、表型和基因组信息,通过GPP(遗传参数预测)计算2010年至2020年每年时间切片的美国荷斯坦猪18个线性构象性状的遗传相关性。GPP依赖于来自验证群体的调整表型对来自参考群体的EBV的预测性,并允许使用完整的商业数据通过时间片进行估计。2010年,参考种群包括2000-2008年出生的奶牛,验证种群包括2009-2011年出生的奶牛。在随后的几年里,人口增长了一岁。利用2020年的遗传相关性,每个性状对最佳拟合(R2)选择的剩余2、3和4个构象(也称为类型)性状进行回归。然后重新计算2010-2019年的回归系数。各性状和2 ~ 4个性状的回归系数随时间变化图显示了各性状间随时间变化的关系。例如,在回归中有2个特征,前乳房附着估计为乳房深度和后乳房宽度的函数(R2 = 0.84);增加身高可使R2增加0.03,增加体深可使R2增加0.04。4性状模型中2个主成分的双图表明,2010年后乳房宽度的影响与体深和身高的影响相似,但在2020年差异更大。总的来说,包含4个特征的预测不太稳定。相关性状的动态变化可以通过2 ~ 4个相关性状方程的回归系数和2个主成分对应的双曲线来直观表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书