From Clipping to Coiling and Beyond: Mapping the Evolution and Future Directions of Intracranial Aneurysm Research.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Jure Pešak, Andrej Kastrin
{"title":"From Clipping to Coiling and Beyond: Mapping the Evolution and Future Directions of Intracranial Aneurysm Research.","authors":"Jure Pešak, Andrej Kastrin","doi":"10.3390/brainsci16090984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Intracranial aneurysm (IA) management has evolved from surgical treatment of ruptured lesions into a multidisciplinary field integrating diagnostics, neurocritical care, endovascular techniques, and individualized risk assessment. As the literature has grown beyond the scope of traditional narrative synthesis, bibliometric methods are needed to characterize the field's development. We used co-word analysis to map the conceptual structure and thematic evolution of IA research over nearly eight decades. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed 22,061 publications indexed in PubMed between 1946 and 2023. Co-word analysis of Medical Subject Headings tracked thematic development across six subperiods grouped into eras. Within each thematic network, topics were classified by centrality and density as motor, niche (highly developed but isolated), emerging or declining, or basic themes. <b>Results</b>: Four historical eras were delineated as an interpretative synthesis of the six subperiods. The open-surgery era (1946-1980) centered on ruptured aneurysms and refinement of operative techniques. The transitional era (1981-1990) was marked by proactive vasospasm management and emerging neurocritical care. The endovascular era (1991-2010) reflected the rise of evidence-based medicine and endovascular therapy. The multidisciplinary era (2011-2023) shifted toward unruptured aneurysms, molecular research, biomechanics, and individualized risk stratification. Recent themes, including hemodynamics, flow diversion, and precision medicine, reflect a growing research emphasis on predictive and personalized approaches to aneurysm management. <b>Conclusions</b>: IA research has evolved from descriptive, technique-oriented studies toward a data-driven landscape increasingly focused on predictive assessment and management of unruptured lesions. Its thematic evolution highlights the growing prominence of molecular and computational approaches, although their clinical and translational impact cannot be directly inferred from the present analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13604126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16090984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Intracranial aneurysm (IA) management has evolved from surgical treatment of ruptured lesions into a multidisciplinary field integrating diagnostics, neurocritical care, endovascular techniques, and individualized risk assessment. As the literature has grown beyond the scope of traditional narrative synthesis, bibliometric methods are needed to characterize the field's development. We used co-word analysis to map the conceptual structure and thematic evolution of IA research over nearly eight decades. Methods: We analyzed 22,061 publications indexed in PubMed between 1946 and 2023. Co-word analysis of Medical Subject Headings tracked thematic development across six subperiods grouped into eras. Within each thematic network, topics were classified by centrality and density as motor, niche (highly developed but isolated), emerging or declining, or basic themes. Results: Four historical eras were delineated as an interpretative synthesis of the six subperiods. The open-surgery era (1946-1980) centered on ruptured aneurysms and refinement of operative techniques. The transitional era (1981-1990) was marked by proactive vasospasm management and emerging neurocritical care. The endovascular era (1991-2010) reflected the rise of evidence-based medicine and endovascular therapy. The multidisciplinary era (2011-2023) shifted toward unruptured aneurysms, molecular research, biomechanics, and individualized risk stratification. Recent themes, including hemodynamics, flow diversion, and precision medicine, reflect a growing research emphasis on predictive and personalized approaches to aneurysm management. Conclusions: IA research has evolved from descriptive, technique-oriented studies toward a data-driven landscape increasingly focused on predictive assessment and management of unruptured lesions. Its thematic evolution highlights the growing prominence of molecular and computational approaches, although their clinical and translational impact cannot be directly inferred from the present analysis.

从夹闭到盘绕再到更远:颅内动脉瘤研究的演变和未来方向。
背景/目的:颅内动脉瘤(IA)的治疗已经从破裂病变的外科治疗发展成为一个多学科领域,包括诊断、神经危重症护理、血管内技术和个体化风险评估。由于文献已经超出了传统叙事综合的范围,需要文献计量学方法来描述该领域的发展。我们使用共词分析来绘制近80年来IA研究的概念结构和主题演变。方法:我们分析了1946年至2023年间在PubMed检索的22,061篇出版物。医学主题词的共词分析跟踪了按时代分组的六个子时期的专题发展。在每个主题网络中,主题按中心性和密度分为运动主题、利基主题(高度发达但孤立)、新兴主题或衰落主题或基本主题。结果:四个历史时期被描述为六个亚时期的解释性综合。开放手术时代(1946-1980)以动脉瘤破裂和手术技术的改进为中心。过渡时期(1981-1990)的特点是积极主动的血管痉挛管理和新兴的神经危重症护理。血管内时代(1991-2010)反映了循证医学和血管内治疗的兴起。多学科时代(2011-2023)转向未破裂动脉瘤、分子研究、生物力学和个体化风险分层。最近的主题,包括血流动力学、血流转移和精准医学,反映了越来越多的研究强调预测和个性化的动脉瘤治疗方法。结论:IA研究已经从描述性的、以技术为导向的研究发展到数据驱动的领域,越来越多地关注于未破裂病变的预测性评估和管理。它的主题演变突出了分子和计算方法的日益突出,尽管它们的临床和转化影响不能直接从目前的分析中推断出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书