Efficacy and Safety of Microvascular Decompression in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia Previously Treated with Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Sebastian Dzierzęcki, Grzegorz Turek, Michał Turek, Zenon Mariak, Wojciech Czyżewski, Jan Gajewski, Jakub Litak, Magdalena Rybaczek, Mateusz Ząbek, Aleksandra Giba, Patrycja Zabrocka, Mirosław Ząbek
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Microvascular Decompression in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia Previously Treated with Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery.","authors":"Sebastian Dzierzęcki, Grzegorz Turek, Michał Turek, Zenon Mariak, Wojciech Czyżewski, Jan Gajewski, Jakub Litak, Magdalena Rybaczek, Mateusz Ząbek, Aleksandra Giba, Patrycja Zabrocka, Mirosław Ząbek","doi":"10.3390/brainsci16090997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKS) controls classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in 70-90% of patients, but pain recurs in a substantial minority, and these patients are then considered for microvascular decompression (MVD). Whether radiation-induced arachnoid thickening, vessel-nerve adhesion and nerve atrophy compromise the safety or efficacy of subsequent MVD remains unresolved, and the available series are small. The objective of this study was to determine whether prior GKS alters the efficacy or the safety of subsequent MVD. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective, two-center cohort study of consecutive patients with classical TN who underwent MVD between 2015 and 2025. Of more than 1571 patients treated with GKS for TN during this period, 35 subsequently underwent MVD for insufficient pain relief (GKS+); they were compared with 60 consecutive patients who underwent primary MVD without prior radiosurgery (GKS-). The primary outcome was pain control on the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale at last follow-up, dichotomized as good (BNI I-III) or poor (BNI IV-V). Secondary outcomes were postoperative adverse events, medication-free status, intraoperative findings, intradural operative time and length of stay. <b>Results:</b> Good long-term pain control was achieved in 31 of 35 GKS+ patients (88.6%) and 55 of 60 GKS- patients (91.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.725) over a mean follow-up of 31.2 and 39.7 months, respectively. Radiation-related intraoperative changes-most often arachnoid thickening (62.9%)-were present in all GKS+ patients. Composite adverse events occurred in 31.4% of GKS+ and 36.7% of GKS- patients (<i>p</i> = 0.660), but the majority were trigeminal sensory disturbances (22.9% and 25.0%, respectively); non-sensory complications occurred in 3 GKS+ patients (8.6%) and 7 GKS- patients (11.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.741). At long-term follow-up, 48.6% of GKS+ and 60.0% of GKS- patients were medication-free (<i>p</i> = 0.294). There were no major neurological deficits and no surgery-related deaths in either cohort. <b>Conclusions:</b> Prior Gamma Knife radiosurgery did not reduce the efficacy or the safety of subsequent microvascular decompression, despite consistently more demanding intraoperative conditions. MVD remains an appropriate rescue option for persistent or recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after failed radiosurgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13604575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16090997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKS) controls classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in 70-90% of patients, but pain recurs in a substantial minority, and these patients are then considered for microvascular decompression (MVD). Whether radiation-induced arachnoid thickening, vessel-nerve adhesion and nerve atrophy compromise the safety or efficacy of subsequent MVD remains unresolved, and the available series are small. The objective of this study was to determine whether prior GKS alters the efficacy or the safety of subsequent MVD. Methods: We performed a retrospective, two-center cohort study of consecutive patients with classical TN who underwent MVD between 2015 and 2025. Of more than 1571 patients treated with GKS for TN during this period, 35 subsequently underwent MVD for insufficient pain relief (GKS+); they were compared with 60 consecutive patients who underwent primary MVD without prior radiosurgery (GKS-). The primary outcome was pain control on the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale at last follow-up, dichotomized as good (BNI I-III) or poor (BNI IV-V). Secondary outcomes were postoperative adverse events, medication-free status, intraoperative findings, intradural operative time and length of stay. Results: Good long-term pain control was achieved in 31 of 35 GKS+ patients (88.6%) and 55 of 60 GKS- patients (91.7%; p = 0.725) over a mean follow-up of 31.2 and 39.7 months, respectively. Radiation-related intraoperative changes-most often arachnoid thickening (62.9%)-were present in all GKS+ patients. Composite adverse events occurred in 31.4% of GKS+ and 36.7% of GKS- patients (p = 0.660), but the majority were trigeminal sensory disturbances (22.9% and 25.0%, respectively); non-sensory complications occurred in 3 GKS+ patients (8.6%) and 7 GKS- patients (11.7%; p = 0.741). At long-term follow-up, 48.6% of GKS+ and 60.0% of GKS- patients were medication-free (p = 0.294). There were no major neurological deficits and no surgery-related deaths in either cohort. Conclusions: Prior Gamma Knife radiosurgery did not reduce the efficacy or the safety of subsequent microvascular decompression, despite consistently more demanding intraoperative conditions. MVD remains an appropriate rescue option for persistent or recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after failed radiosurgery.

伽玛刀立体定向放射治疗三叉神经痛患者微血管减压的疗效和安全性。
背景/目的:伽玛刀立体定向放射手术(GKS)可以控制70-90%的患者的经典三叉神经痛(TN),但在相当少数的患者中疼痛复发,这些患者随后考虑进行微血管减压(MVD)。辐射诱导的蛛网膜增厚、血管-神经粘连和神经萎缩是否会影响后续MVD的安全性或有效性尚不清楚,可用的系列也很少。本研究的目的是确定先前的GKS是否会改变后续MVD的疗效或安全性。方法:我们对2015年至2025年间接受MVD的经典TN患者进行了回顾性、双中心队列研究。在此期间,超过1571名患者接受了GKS治疗,其中35名患者随后因疼痛缓解不足而接受了MVD (GKS+);他们与连续60例未接受放射治疗的原发性MVD患者(GKS-)进行了比较。最后随访时,主要结局是巴罗神经学研究所(BNI)疼痛控制量表,分为良好(BNI I-III)和较差(BNI IV-V)。次要结局是术后不良事件、无药物状态、术中发现、硬膜内手术时间和住院时间。结果:35例GKS+患者中有31例(88.6%)和60例GKS-患者中有55例(91.7%,p = 0.725)获得了良好的长期疼痛控制,平均随访时间分别为31.2个月和39.7个月。所有GKS+患者均存在与放疗相关的术中改变,最常见的是蛛网膜增厚(62.9%)。GKS+组31.4%和GKS-组36.7%发生复合不良事件(p = 0.660),但以三叉神经感觉障碍为主(分别为22.9%和25.0%);GKS+患者发生非感觉并发症3例(8.6%),GKS-患者发生非感觉并发症7例(11.7%),p = 0.741。在长期随访中,48.6%的GKS+和60.0%的GKS-患者无药物治疗(p = 0.294)。两组患者均无重大神经功能缺损和手术相关死亡。结论:先前的伽玛刀放射手术并未降低随后微血管减压的疗效或安全性,尽管术中条件一直要求更高。对于放射手术失败后持续性或复发性三叉神经痛,MVD仍然是一种合适的抢救选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书