From Entry to Embeddedness: How Urban-to-Rural Newcomers Reshape Development Outcomes in Peri-Urban China

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Pingyang Liu
{"title":"From Entry to Embeddedness: How Urban-to-Rural Newcomers Reshape Development Outcomes in Peri-Urban China","authors":"Pingyang Liu","doi":"10.1002/psp.70374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Rural digitalisation expands access to information and participatory channels, but greater digital provision does not necessarily produce equal opportunities to participate. Less is known about whether local governing arrangements compensate for digital disadvantage or instead increase the participatory returns to greater digital capability across different governance tasks. Using face-to-face survey data from 616 residents in 19 peri-urban villages in Shanghai, China, this study examines institutional participation, voluntary community service and willingness to participate in village-based economic development. Three differentiated patterns emerge. Intensive face-to-face governance attenuates the negative digital-capability gradient in village-level decision-making, although the evidence remains suggestive; the same governance mode more clearly compensates for limited digital capability in voluntary community service. Most robustly, the regulatory influence of village rules strengthens the relationship between independent online information-search capability and willingness to participate in local economic development. Cross-domain tests reveal no comparable conditioning patterns. The findings show that governance arrangements that facilitate participation need not reduce participation inequality: their distributive consequences depend on the organisational requirements of the participation task. In Chinese village governance, digitalisation therefore operates through, rather than independently of, relational and informal institutional arrangements that shape who can convert digital resources into participation across different governance tasks.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"32 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural digitalisation expands access to information and participatory channels, but greater digital provision does not necessarily produce equal opportunities to participate. Less is known about whether local governing arrangements compensate for digital disadvantage or instead increase the participatory returns to greater digital capability across different governance tasks. Using face-to-face survey data from 616 residents in 19 peri-urban villages in Shanghai, China, this study examines institutional participation, voluntary community service and willingness to participate in village-based economic development. Three differentiated patterns emerge. Intensive face-to-face governance attenuates the negative digital-capability gradient in village-level decision-making, although the evidence remains suggestive; the same governance mode more clearly compensates for limited digital capability in voluntary community service. Most robustly, the regulatory influence of village rules strengthens the relationship between independent online information-search capability and willingness to participate in local economic development. Cross-domain tests reveal no comparable conditioning patterns. The findings show that governance arrangements that facilitate participation need not reduce participation inequality: their distributive consequences depend on the organisational requirements of the participation task. In Chinese village governance, digitalisation therefore operates through, rather than independently of, relational and informal institutional arrangements that shape who can convert digital resources into participation across different governance tasks.

从进入到嵌入:城乡新移民如何重塑中国城郊地区的发展成果
农村数字化扩大了获取信息和参与渠道的渠道,但更多的数字提供并不一定带来平等的参与机会。至于地方治理安排是弥补了数字劣势,还是增加了跨不同治理任务的更大数字能力的参与性回报,人们知之甚少。本研究利用对上海19个城中村616名居民的面对面调查数据,考察了机构参与、社区志愿服务和参与村本经济发展的意愿。出现了三种不同的模式。密集的面对面治理减弱了村级决策中的负数字能力梯度,尽管证据仍然具有暗示意义;同样的治理模式更明显地弥补了志愿社区服务中有限的数字能力。最有力的是,村规的监管影响强化了自主在线信息搜索能力与参与当地经济发展意愿之间的关系。跨域测试没有发现可比较的条件反射模式。研究结果表明,促进参与的治理安排并不需要减少参与不平等:它们的分配结果取决于参与任务的组织要求。因此,在中国的乡村治理中,数字化通过关系和非正式的制度安排而不是独立运作,这些安排决定了谁可以将数字资源转化为参与不同的治理任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书