{"title":"The High Five Model as a Predictor of Optimal Functioning in University Students: A Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Diana García Dilba, Alejandro Castro Solano","doi":"10.5964/ejop.15589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The high-five model (HFM) categorizes five positive human characteristics-erudition, peace, joviality, honesty, and tenacity - on the basis of an inductive psycholexical approach. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of the HFM in a sample of university students to assess whether these traits could predict optimal functioning after 20 months. Optimal functioning was defined as high academic performance; emotional, personal, and social well-being; and low levels of psychopathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 136 university students with a mean age of 30.8 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.86; 83% female; 17% male). The predictor variables were high factors (HFI - High Five Inventory -), and the criterion variables were emotional, personal, and social well-being (Mental Health Continuum-Short Form - MHC-SF -), psychopathological symptoms (Symptom Checklist-27, SCL-27), and academic achievement (self-reported academic grades). The data were analyzed both cross-sectionally and longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicated that the HFI, particularly the factors of Honesty (β = .64, <i>p</i> = .05) and Tenacity (β = .49, <i>p</i> = .01), demonstrated high predictive power in identifying profiles of optimal functioning (high complete mental well-being) in university students after 20 months. The predictive power of the model was greater when predictors and criteria were analyzed cross-sectionally rather than longitudinally (explaining 35% vs. 17% of the variance).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HFM effectively distinguished between high- and low-complete mental well-being groups both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, demonstrating its robustness in predicting optimal functioning at various time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":47113,"journal":{"name":"Europes Journal of Psychology","volume":"22 2","pages":"175-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13600064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europes Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.15589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The high-five model (HFM) categorizes five positive human characteristics-erudition, peace, joviality, honesty, and tenacity - on the basis of an inductive psycholexical approach. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of the HFM in a sample of university students to assess whether these traits could predict optimal functioning after 20 months. Optimal functioning was defined as high academic performance; emotional, personal, and social well-being; and low levels of psychopathology.
Methods: The study included 136 university students with a mean age of 30.8 years (SD = 1.86; 83% female; 17% male). The predictor variables were high factors (HFI - High Five Inventory -), and the criterion variables were emotional, personal, and social well-being (Mental Health Continuum-Short Form - MHC-SF -), psychopathological symptoms (Symptom Checklist-27, SCL-27), and academic achievement (self-reported academic grades). The data were analyzed both cross-sectionally and longitudinally.
Results: The findings indicated that the HFI, particularly the factors of Honesty (β = .64, p = .05) and Tenacity (β = .49, p = .01), demonstrated high predictive power in identifying profiles of optimal functioning (high complete mental well-being) in university students after 20 months. The predictive power of the model was greater when predictors and criteria were analyzed cross-sectionally rather than longitudinally (explaining 35% vs. 17% of the variance).
Conclusions: HFM effectively distinguished between high- and low-complete mental well-being groups both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, demonstrating its robustness in predicting optimal functioning at various time points.