Cognitive and Emotional Predictors of Decision-Making in Adults: Roles of Cognitive Functions and Emotion Regulation Difficulties.

IF 2.7 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Europes Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2026-08-28 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.5964/ejop.17823
Yuzu Yoshimaru, Shinji Okazaki
{"title":"Cognitive and Emotional Predictors of Decision-Making in Adults: Roles of Cognitive Functions and Emotion Regulation Difficulties.","authors":"Yuzu Yoshimaru, Shinji Okazaki","doi":"10.5964/ejop.17823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a widely used measure of decision-making that mimics real-life situations involving uncertainty and reward. While prior research has separately explored the roles of cognitive functions (e.g., intelligence) and non-cognitive factors (e.g., emotion regulation), few have examined their combined and relative influence. This study aimed to clarify how cognitive abilities and emotion regulation difficulties contribute to decision-making under ambiguity and risk, as assessed by the IGT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty healthy adults completed a modified version of the IGT, a battery of cognitive tasks measuring planning, attention, and working memory, and the Japanese version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (J-DERS). Zero-order and partial correlations as well as hierarchical regression analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zero-order correlations indicated significant positive associations between advantageous IGT performance and both working memory and attention. These associations remained significant after controlling J-DERS scores in partial correlations. However, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that neither cognitive abilities nor emotion regulation difficulties significantly predicted overall IGT performance. Contrary to expectations, emotion regulation difficulties were not significantly related to risky choices, suggesting a weaker role than previously attributed to emotional intelligence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that cognitive functions, particularly attentional control, are more strongly associated with advantageous decision-making, especially during later stages of the task. These findings underscore the primacy of cognitive functions in implicit decision-making. Study limitations include a small sample size and a lack of neurophysiological data, highlighting the need for future studies with neuroimaging and larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":47113,"journal":{"name":"Europes Journal of Psychology","volume":"22 3","pages":"423-443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13600054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europes Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.17823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a widely used measure of decision-making that mimics real-life situations involving uncertainty and reward. While prior research has separately explored the roles of cognitive functions (e.g., intelligence) and non-cognitive factors (e.g., emotion regulation), few have examined their combined and relative influence. This study aimed to clarify how cognitive abilities and emotion regulation difficulties contribute to decision-making under ambiguity and risk, as assessed by the IGT.

Methods: Fifty healthy adults completed a modified version of the IGT, a battery of cognitive tasks measuring planning, attention, and working memory, and the Japanese version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (J-DERS). Zero-order and partial correlations as well as hierarchical regression analyses were conducted.

Results: Zero-order correlations indicated significant positive associations between advantageous IGT performance and both working memory and attention. These associations remained significant after controlling J-DERS scores in partial correlations. However, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that neither cognitive abilities nor emotion regulation difficulties significantly predicted overall IGT performance. Contrary to expectations, emotion regulation difficulties were not significantly related to risky choices, suggesting a weaker role than previously attributed to emotional intelligence.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that cognitive functions, particularly attentional control, are more strongly associated with advantageous decision-making, especially during later stages of the task. These findings underscore the primacy of cognitive functions in implicit decision-making. Study limitations include a small sample size and a lack of neurophysiological data, highlighting the need for future studies with neuroimaging and larger samples.

成人决策的认知和情绪预测因素:认知功能和情绪调节困难的作用。
目的:爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)是一个广泛使用的决策措施,模仿现实生活中涉及不确定性和奖励的情况。虽然先前的研究分别探讨了认知功能(如智力)和非认知因素(如情绪调节)的作用,但很少有人研究它们的综合和相对影响。本研究旨在阐明IGT评估的认知能力和情绪调节困难如何影响模糊和风险下的决策。方法:50名健康成人完成了修改版的IGT,一系列测量计划、注意力和工作记忆的认知任务,以及日本版的情绪调节困难量表(J-DERS)。进行了零阶相关、偏相关和层次回归分析。结果:零阶相关表明,良好的IGT表现与工作记忆和注意力之间存在显著的正相关。在控制了J-DERS分数的部分相关性后,这些关联仍然显著。然而,层次回归分析显示,认知能力和情绪调节困难都不能显著预测整体IGT表现。与预期相反,情绪调节困难与风险选择没有显著关系,这表明情绪智力的作用比之前认为的要弱。结论:研究结果表明,认知功能,特别是注意力控制,与有利的决策有更强的联系,尤其是在任务的后期阶段。这些发现强调了认知功能在隐性决策中的首要地位。研究的局限性包括样本量小和缺乏神经生理学数据,这突出了未来神经影像学和更大样本研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europes Journal of Psychology
Europes Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书