Motivation Profiles Towards Academic Reading, Substance-Related and Problematic Behaviors in Future Teachers.

IF 3.7 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
María de la Rocha Díaz, Inmaculada Méndez, Nuria Antón-Ros, Cecilia Ruiz-Esteban
{"title":"Motivation Profiles Towards Academic Reading, Substance-Related and Problematic Behaviors in Future Teachers.","authors":"María de la Rocha Díaz, Inmaculada Méndez, Nuria Antón-Ros, Cecilia Ruiz-Esteban","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe16090124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motivation for academic reading is a relevant component of initial teacher training. However, little is known about whether distinct motivational profiles exist in association with patterns of substance use and problematic behaviors among prospective teachers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 289 students (77.5% female; aged 18-34) enrolled in Early Childhood Education and Primary Education degree programs. Motivation for academic reading was assessed using the Academic Reading Motivation Scale (EMLA), while substance- and behavior-related problems were evaluated using the MULTICAGE CAD-4 questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was used to identify academic reading motivation profiles, and multivariate and post hoc analyses were performed to examine differences in scores across profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three motivational profiles were identified, characterized by high, intermediate, and low levels of academic reading motivation. Significant differences between profiles were observed regarding problems related to alcohol, drug use, gambling, video games, and compulsive spending.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Academic reading motivation profiles were associated with various screening indicators for substance use and problematic behaviors. Given the cross-sectional and self-report nature of the study, these findings should not be interpreted in terms of causality. The results highlight the potential value of jointly considering academic motivation and health-related behavioral indicators in future teacher training.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13605590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16090124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Motivation for academic reading is a relevant component of initial teacher training. However, little is known about whether distinct motivational profiles exist in association with patterns of substance use and problematic behaviors among prospective teachers.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 289 students (77.5% female; aged 18-34) enrolled in Early Childhood Education and Primary Education degree programs. Motivation for academic reading was assessed using the Academic Reading Motivation Scale (EMLA), while substance- and behavior-related problems were evaluated using the MULTICAGE CAD-4 questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was used to identify academic reading motivation profiles, and multivariate and post hoc analyses were performed to examine differences in scores across profiles.

Results: Three motivational profiles were identified, characterized by high, intermediate, and low levels of academic reading motivation. Significant differences between profiles were observed regarding problems related to alcohol, drug use, gambling, video games, and compulsive spending.

Conclusions: Academic reading motivation profiles were associated with various screening indicators for substance use and problematic behaviors. Given the cross-sectional and self-report nature of the study, these findings should not be interpreted in terms of causality. The results highlight the potential value of jointly considering academic motivation and health-related behavioral indicators in future teacher training.

未来教师学术阅读、实质相关行为和问题行为的动机分析。
背景:学术阅读动机是教师初始培训的一个相关组成部分。然而,在未来的教师中,是否存在与物质使用模式和问题行为相关的不同动机特征,人们知之甚少。方法:对289名幼儿教育与小学教育专业学生进行横断面研究,其中女性77.5%,年龄18-34岁。使用学术阅读动机量表(EMLA)评估学术阅读动机,使用MULTICAGE CAD-4问卷评估物质和行为相关问题。使用潜在分析来确定学术阅读动机的概况,并进行多变量和事后分析来检查各概况的得分差异。结果:发现了三种动机特征,分别为高、中、低水平学术阅读动机。在与酗酒、吸毒、赌博、电子游戏和强迫性消费有关的问题上,两组数据存在显著差异。结论:学术阅读动机与物质使用和问题行为的筛选指标相关。考虑到研究的横断面和自我报告性质,这些发现不应该被解释为因果关系。研究结果强调了在未来的教师培训中联合考虑学习动机和健康相关行为指标的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书