Associations Between Protective Factors and Prosocial Behaviors Among Children and Adolescents with Childhood Maltreatment: A Three-level Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Lei Yang, Rui Yuan
{"title":"Associations Between Protective Factors and Prosocial Behaviors Among Children and Adolescents with Childhood Maltreatment: A Three-level Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lei Yang, Rui Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s10964-026-02419-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Childhood maltreatment has been extensively studied for its negative developmental consequences, yet the role of protective factors in promoting prosocial behaviors among affected children and adolescents has remained unclear. The present study addressed this gap by conducting a three-level meta-analysis to examine the associations between four types of protective factors (psychological capital, emotion regulation ability, parenting quality and family functioning, and social support) and prosocial behaviors in this population. A total of 17 studies with 34 effect sizes were included (n = 43,477). The results showed that most types of protective factors exhibited small-to-moderate positive associations with prosocial behaviors (r = .314 to 0.406, p < .001), whereas emotion regulation ability showed a non-significant and near-zero correlation (r = - .017; z = - 0.204, p = .838). A significant moderating effect emerged for study quality, with higher-quality studies yielding stronger associations. Although the type of protective factor did not serve as a significant overall moderator, emotion regulation ability demonstrated a significantly weaker association with prosocial behaviors compared with psychological capital. These findings point to the potential relevance of psychological capital, family-based resources, and social support for interventions targeting the maltreated, whereas emotion regulation training may be less promising as a standalone strategy. Policy efforts that support parenting programs and community-based social services could also be considered, though these suggestions remain tentative pending further causal evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-026-02419-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Childhood maltreatment has been extensively studied for its negative developmental consequences, yet the role of protective factors in promoting prosocial behaviors among affected children and adolescents has remained unclear. The present study addressed this gap by conducting a three-level meta-analysis to examine the associations between four types of protective factors (psychological capital, emotion regulation ability, parenting quality and family functioning, and social support) and prosocial behaviors in this population. A total of 17 studies with 34 effect sizes were included (n = 43,477). The results showed that most types of protective factors exhibited small-to-moderate positive associations with prosocial behaviors (r = .314 to 0.406, p < .001), whereas emotion regulation ability showed a non-significant and near-zero correlation (r = - .017; z = - 0.204, p = .838). A significant moderating effect emerged for study quality, with higher-quality studies yielding stronger associations. Although the type of protective factor did not serve as a significant overall moderator, emotion regulation ability demonstrated a significantly weaker association with prosocial behaviors compared with psychological capital. These findings point to the potential relevance of psychological capital, family-based resources, and social support for interventions targeting the maltreated, whereas emotion regulation training may be less promising as a standalone strategy. Policy efforts that support parenting programs and community-based social services could also be considered, though these suggestions remain tentative pending further causal evidence.

儿童期受虐待儿童和青少年的保护因素与亲社会行为的关系:一个三水平元分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书