I/o for LLM inference: a survey of storage and memory bottlenecks

IF 18.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2026-07-24 Epub Date: 2026-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s10462-026-11651-1
Rajarshi Chowdhury
{"title":"I/o for LLM inference: a survey of storage and memory bottlenecks","authors":"Rajarshi Chowdhury","doi":"10.1007/s10462-026-11651-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deploying Large Language Models at scale has shifted the dominant bottleneck from compute during training to memory and I/O during inference. As parameter counts reach hundreds of billions and context windows stretch past a million tokens, latency and throughput are limited not by arithmetic but by data movement across the memory hierarchy. This survey decomposes inference I/O into three flows—<i>model weight I/O</i>, <i>Key-Value (KV) cache I/O</i>, and <i>activation I/O</i>—and uses roofline analysis to map each optimization to the memory-hierarchy level it targets. We cover quantization, PagedAttention, FlashAttention, speculative decoding, KV cache compression, and offloading, alongside system-level orchestration (continuous batching, disaggregated prefill-decode, prefix caching) and hardware trends (HBM scaling, CXL, processing-in-memory, unified memory). A composability analysis reveals that stacking optimizations causes the dominant bottleneck to oscillate between weight and KV cache I/O. We close by identifying open problems in unbounded-context scaling, expert caching, edge deployment, and I/O-aware benchmarking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"59 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-026-11651-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11651-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deploying Large Language Models at scale has shifted the dominant bottleneck from compute during training to memory and I/O during inference. As parameter counts reach hundreds of billions and context windows stretch past a million tokens, latency and throughput are limited not by arithmetic but by data movement across the memory hierarchy. This survey decomposes inference I/O into three flows—model weight I/O, Key-Value (KV) cache I/O, and activation I/O—and uses roofline analysis to map each optimization to the memory-hierarchy level it targets. We cover quantization, PagedAttention, FlashAttention, speculative decoding, KV cache compression, and offloading, alongside system-level orchestration (continuous batching, disaggregated prefill-decode, prefix caching) and hardware trends (HBM scaling, CXL, processing-in-memory, unified memory). A composability analysis reveals that stacking optimizations causes the dominant bottleneck to oscillate between weight and KV cache I/O. We close by identifying open problems in unbounded-context scaling, expert caching, edge deployment, and I/O-aware benchmarking.

LLM推理的I/o:对存储和内存瓶颈的调查
大规模部署大型语言模型已经将主要瓶颈从训练期间的计算转移到推理期间的内存和I/O。当参数计数达到数千亿,上下文窗口超过一百万个令牌时,延迟和吞吐量不是由算术限制,而是由内存层次结构中的数据移动限制。本调查将推理I/O分解为三个流程—模型权重I/O、键值(KV)缓存I/O和激活I/O—并使用rooline分析将每个优化映射到其目标的内存层次结构级别。我们将讨论量化、PagedAttention、FlashAttention、推测解码、KV缓存压缩和卸载,以及系统级编排(连续批处理、分解预解码、前缀缓存)和硬件趋势(HBM扩展、CXL、内存处理、统一内存)。可组合性分析表明,堆栈优化导致主要瓶颈在权重和KV缓存I/O之间振荡。最后,我们确定了在无边界上下文扩展、专家缓存、边缘部署和I/ o感知基准测试方面的开放问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书