A review on safe reinforcement learning using Lyapunov and barrier functions

IF 18.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2026-06-29 Epub Date: 2026-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s10462-026-11611-9
Dhruv Kushwaha, Zoleikha Biron
{"title":"A review on safe reinforcement learning using Lyapunov and barrier functions","authors":"Dhruv Kushwaha,&nbsp;Zoleikha Biron","doi":"10.1007/s10462-026-11611-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven to be particularly effective in solving complex decision-making problems for a wide range of applications. From a control theory perspective, RL can be considered as an adaptive optimal control scheme. Lyapunov and barrier functions are the most commonly used certificates to guarantee system stability for a proposed/derived controller and constraint satisfaction guarantees, respectively, in control-theoretic approaches. However, compared to theoretical guarantees available in control-theoretic methods, RL lacks closed-loop stability of a computed policy and constraint satisfaction guarantees. Safe reinforcement learning refers to a class of constrained problems where the constraint violations lead to partial or complete system failure. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of safe RL techniques using Lyapunov and barrier functions to guarantee this notion of safety (stability of the system in terms of a computed policy and constraint satisfaction during training and deployment). Three concrete takeaways emerge from our analysis: (i) the field has shifted decisively from model-based to model-free formulations since 2017, with combined CLF–CBF approaches becoming the most active sub-area post-2022; (ii) per-class open problems are now well-defined, certificate validity under function approximation and distribution shift for Lyapunov methods, feasibility and deadlock under hard CBF–QP shielding for barrier methods, and joint CLF–CBF feasibility under model uncertainty for combined methods; and (iii) deployment to high-dimensional and partially observable settings remains the dominant scalability barrier across all three classes. The different approaches employed are discussed in detail along with their shortcomings and benefits to provide critique and possible future research directions. The review demonstrates promising scope for providing safety guarantees for complex dynamical systems with operational constraints using model-based and model-free RL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"59 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-026-11611-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11611-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven to be particularly effective in solving complex decision-making problems for a wide range of applications. From a control theory perspective, RL can be considered as an adaptive optimal control scheme. Lyapunov and barrier functions are the most commonly used certificates to guarantee system stability for a proposed/derived controller and constraint satisfaction guarantees, respectively, in control-theoretic approaches. However, compared to theoretical guarantees available in control-theoretic methods, RL lacks closed-loop stability of a computed policy and constraint satisfaction guarantees. Safe reinforcement learning refers to a class of constrained problems where the constraint violations lead to partial or complete system failure. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of safe RL techniques using Lyapunov and barrier functions to guarantee this notion of safety (stability of the system in terms of a computed policy and constraint satisfaction during training and deployment). Three concrete takeaways emerge from our analysis: (i) the field has shifted decisively from model-based to model-free formulations since 2017, with combined CLF–CBF approaches becoming the most active sub-area post-2022; (ii) per-class open problems are now well-defined, certificate validity under function approximation and distribution shift for Lyapunov methods, feasibility and deadlock under hard CBF–QP shielding for barrier methods, and joint CLF–CBF feasibility under model uncertainty for combined methods; and (iii) deployment to high-dimensional and partially observable settings remains the dominant scalability barrier across all three classes. The different approaches employed are discussed in detail along with their shortcomings and benefits to provide critique and possible future research directions. The review demonstrates promising scope for providing safety guarantees for complex dynamical systems with operational constraints using model-based and model-free RL.

基于李雅普诺夫函数和屏障函数的安全强化学习研究综述
强化学习(RL)已被证明在解决广泛应用的复杂决策问题方面特别有效。从控制理论的角度来看,强化学习可以看作是一种自适应最优控制方案。在控制理论方法中,李雅普诺夫函数和屏障函数分别是最常用的保证所提出/推导的控制器和约束满足保证的系统稳定性的证书。然而,与控制理论方法中的理论保证相比,强化学习缺乏计算策略的闭环稳定性和约束满足保证。安全强化学习是指一类约束问题,其中违反约束导致系统部分或完全失效。这篇综述的目的是提供安全RL技术的概述,使用Lyapunov和屏障函数来保证这种安全概念(在训练和部署期间计算策略和约束满足方面的系统稳定性)。从我们的分析中得出了三个具体结论:(i)自2017年以来,该领域已从基于模型的配方果断转向无模型配方,CLF-CBF组合方法成为2022年后最活跃的子领域;(ii)每类开放问题现在定义良好,Lyapunov方法在函数近似和分布移位下的证书有效性,屏障方法在硬CBF-QP屏蔽下的可行性和死锁,组合方法在模型不确定性下的联合CLF-CBF可行性;(iii)部署到高维和部分可观察的设置仍然是所有三个类的主要可扩展性障碍。详细讨论了所采用的不同方法以及它们的缺点和优点,以提供批评和可能的未来研究方向。该综述展示了利用基于模型和无模型的RL为具有操作约束的复杂动态系统提供安全保证的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书