Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Five First-line Treatment Regimens for ALK-positive NSCLC in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Hui Zhang, Shuangshuang Hu, Yuhang Liu, Jing Ou, Bikun Cai, Guihao Zeng
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Five First-line Treatment Regimens for ALK-positive NSCLC in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hui Zhang, Shuangshuang Hu, Yuhang Liu, Jing Ou, Bikun Cai, Guihao Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2026.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With multiple first-line treatment options now available for advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), clinicians and patients face significant challenges in selecting the optimal therapeutic strategy. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapies from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using crizotinib as a common comparator, we performed indirect comparisons across five ALK-TKIs by reconstructing survival data and applying fractional polynomial models to estimate time-varying hazard ratios. A partitioned survival model was developed to assess cost-effectiveness. Deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to evaluate model robustness. Primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at $27,906.00/QALY.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to crizotinib, the ICERs for lorlatinib, alectinib, ensartinib, brigatinib, and iruplinalkib were $4,674.43/QALY, $5,361.28/QALY, $199,751.00/QALY, -$29,623.06/QALY, and $4,652.70/QALY, respectively. Iruplinalkib yielded the highest QALY gain, while brigatinib was associated with the lowest total cost. DSA identified utility values and drug prices as key drivers of the ICERs. At a WTP threshold of $27,906/QALY, PSA indicated that iruplinalkib had the highest probability (75.70%) of being cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC in China, lorlatinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and iruplinalkib are cost-effective compared to crizotinib, with the exception of ensartinib. Among these, iruplinalkib is the most cost-effective TKI for first-line treatment, followed by lorlatinib.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2026.08.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With multiple first-line treatment options now available for advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), clinicians and patients face significant challenges in selecting the optimal therapeutic strategy. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapies from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

Methods: Using crizotinib as a common comparator, we performed indirect comparisons across five ALK-TKIs by reconstructing survival data and applying fractional polynomial models to estimate time-varying hazard ratios. A partitioned survival model was developed to assess cost-effectiveness. Deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to evaluate model robustness. Primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at $27,906.00/QALY.

Results: Compared to crizotinib, the ICERs for lorlatinib, alectinib, ensartinib, brigatinib, and iruplinalkib were $4,674.43/QALY, $5,361.28/QALY, $199,751.00/QALY, -$29,623.06/QALY, and $4,652.70/QALY, respectively. Iruplinalkib yielded the highest QALY gain, while brigatinib was associated with the lowest total cost. DSA identified utility values and drug prices as key drivers of the ICERs. At a WTP threshold of $27,906/QALY, PSA indicated that iruplinalkib had the highest probability (75.70%) of being cost-effective.

Conclusion: For patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC in China, lorlatinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and iruplinalkib are cost-effective compared to crizotinib, with the exception of ensartinib. Among these, iruplinalkib is the most cost-effective TKI for first-line treatment, followed by lorlatinib.

中国alk阳性非小细胞肺癌5种一线治疗方案的成本-效果分析:基于网络meta分析的经济评价
背景:随着晚期alk阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的多种一线治疗方案的出现,临床医生和患者在选择最佳治疗策略方面面临着重大挑战。本研究旨在从中国医疗保健系统的角度评估5种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)作为一线治疗的成本-效果。方法:使用克唑替尼作为常见比较剂,我们通过重建生存数据和应用分数多项式模型来估计时变风险比,对5种ALK-TKIs进行了间接比较。采用分区生存模型评估成本-效果。采用确定性敏感性分析(DSA)和概率敏感性分析(PSA)评价模型的稳健性。主要结局包括总成本、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)。支付意愿(WTP)门槛设定为27,906.00美元/QALY。结果:与克唑替尼相比,lorlatinib、alectinib、恩沙替尼、brigatinib和iruplinalkib的ICERs分别为4,674.43美元/QALY、5,361.28美元/QALY、199,751.00美元/QALY、- 29,623.06美元/QALY和4,652.70美元/QALY。伊鲁普那基布的QALY增益最高,而布加替尼的总成本最低。DSA确定效用价值和药品价格是ICERs的主要驱动因素。在WTP阈值为27,906美元/QALY时,PSA显示iruplinalkib具有最高的成本效益概率(75.70%)。结论:对于中国晚期alk阳性NSCLC患者,除恩沙替尼外,洛拉替尼、阿勒替尼、布加替尼和伊鲁普替尼与克唑替尼相比具有成本效益。其中,iruplinalkib是一线治疗最具成本效益的TKI,其次是lorlatinib。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书