73 days?! Examining the rate at which medical knowledge doubles and its implications.

IF 6.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kevin W Eva
{"title":"73 days?! Examining the rate at which medical knowledge doubles and its implications.","authors":"Kevin W Eva","doi":"10.1111/medu.70323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>The issue: </strong>'Knowledge is accumulating faster than human-beings have the capacity to assimilate it'. According to popular estimate, knowledge now doubles every 73 days, roughly the lifespan of a housefly. We need, therefore, to stop thinking of health professional education in terms of transmission of knowledge. Instead, we need to focus training programmes on enabling learners to use the increasingly powerful technologies that are revolutionizing how health care is practiced. And we need to stop using assessments that seem increasingly inauthentic by virtue of precluding learners from using such technologies.</p><p><strong>Reflections: </strong>Do we? Do we really? This Medical Education Mythology paper explores the origin of the prominent claim that medical knowledge doubles every 73 days, offers an empirical assessment of its veracity and outlines several repercussions that can arise if we accept the estimate without critical appraisal. In doing so, we encourage reflection on the implications of the exponential rate at which knowledge is increasing at the same time as urging caution against panic-driven education practices. In doing so, we conclude that the lack of defensible basis for such an extreme estimate highlights the importance of continued evolution in our education and clinical practices rather than catastrophe-motivated transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue: 'Knowledge is accumulating faster than human-beings have the capacity to assimilate it'. According to popular estimate, knowledge now doubles every 73 days, roughly the lifespan of a housefly. We need, therefore, to stop thinking of health professional education in terms of transmission of knowledge. Instead, we need to focus training programmes on enabling learners to use the increasingly powerful technologies that are revolutionizing how health care is practiced. And we need to stop using assessments that seem increasingly inauthentic by virtue of precluding learners from using such technologies.

Reflections: Do we? Do we really? This Medical Education Mythology paper explores the origin of the prominent claim that medical knowledge doubles every 73 days, offers an empirical assessment of its veracity and outlines several repercussions that can arise if we accept the estimate without critical appraisal. In doing so, we encourage reflection on the implications of the exponential rate at which knowledge is increasing at the same time as urging caution against panic-driven education practices. In doing so, we conclude that the lack of defensible basis for such an extreme estimate highlights the importance of continued evolution in our education and clinical practices rather than catastrophe-motivated transformation.

73天? !研究医学知识翻倍的速度及其影响。
问题是:“知识积累的速度超过了人类吸收知识的能力。”根据普遍的估计,知识现在每73天翻一番,大约是家蝇的寿命。因此,我们需要停止从知识传播的角度考虑卫生专业教育。相反,我们需要把培训方案的重点放在使学习者能够使用日益强大的技术上,这些技术正在彻底改变卫生保健的做法。我们需要停止使用那些由于阻止学习者使用这些技术而显得越来越不真实的评估。反思:是吗?真的吗?这篇医学教育神话论文探讨了医学知识每73天翻一番这一著名说法的起源,对其真实性进行了实证评估,并概述了如果我们在没有经过批判性评估的情况下接受这一估计可能产生的几种影响。在这样做的过程中,我们鼓励对知识以指数速度增长的影响进行反思,同时敦促对恐慌驱动的教育实践保持警惕。在这样做的过程中,我们得出结论,这种极端估计缺乏可辩护的基础,强调了在我们的教育和临床实践中持续进化的重要性,而不是灾难驱动的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书