Informant-Reported Mobility-Related Observations Associated With Subsequent Dementia in Adults With Intellectual Disability: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Karl Olsson, Barry Karlsson, Ylva Cedervall, Hanna Bozkurt Åhman
{"title":"Informant-Reported Mobility-Related Observations Associated With Subsequent Dementia in Adults With Intellectual Disability: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.","authors":"Karl Olsson, Barry Karlsson, Ylva Cedervall, Hanna Bozkurt Åhman","doi":"10.1111/jir.70181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia is more prevalent in individuals with intellectual disability (ID) than in the general population. Identifying signs of dementia is important to access relevant evaluations, treatment and care. The role of mobility in identifying dementia in ID is not well understood. The aims of the study were to describe mobility-related problems in a cohort of adults with ID and to investigate if these problems could be associated with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mobility-related items were selected from clinical carer-rated instruments and participants' dementia statuses were based on assessments at two points in time. Fisher's exact test was used for comparisons between groups with and without suspected dementia. Logistic regression, adjusted for age and level of ID, was used to investigate associations between mobility and subsequent dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline (N = 85), the median age was 58 years, 39% were female, and 37% had Trisomy 21. Pain and low physical endurance were present in more than 50% of the participants. Low physical endurance was more prevalent among participants with suspected dementia than in those without suspected dementia (p = 0.016). Low physical endurance, adjusted for age and level of ID, was associated with dementia after 6 years (OR 9.349, p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low physical endurance, when combined with other observations, could help carers identify individuals with ID who should be referred for a dementia assessment. However, the results need to be confirmed in larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dementia is more prevalent in individuals with intellectual disability (ID) than in the general population. Identifying signs of dementia is important to access relevant evaluations, treatment and care. The role of mobility in identifying dementia in ID is not well understood. The aims of the study were to describe mobility-related problems in a cohort of adults with ID and to investigate if these problems could be associated with dementia.

Methods: Mobility-related items were selected from clinical carer-rated instruments and participants' dementia statuses were based on assessments at two points in time. Fisher's exact test was used for comparisons between groups with and without suspected dementia. Logistic regression, adjusted for age and level of ID, was used to investigate associations between mobility and subsequent dementia.

Results: At baseline (N = 85), the median age was 58 years, 39% were female, and 37% had Trisomy 21. Pain and low physical endurance were present in more than 50% of the participants. Low physical endurance was more prevalent among participants with suspected dementia than in those without suspected dementia (p = 0.016). Low physical endurance, adjusted for age and level of ID, was associated with dementia after 6 years (OR 9.349, p = 0.019).

Conclusions: Low physical endurance, when combined with other observations, could help carers identify individuals with ID who should be referred for a dementia assessment. However, the results need to be confirmed in larger samples.

在智力残疾的成年人中,举报人报告的与活动相关的观察与随后的痴呆相关:一项纵向队列研究。
背景:痴呆症在智力残疾(ID)个体中比在普通人群中更为普遍。识别痴呆症的迹象对于获得相关的评估、治疗和护理非常重要。活动能力在识别ID痴呆中的作用尚未得到很好的理解。该研究的目的是描述一组患有ID的成年人的行动相关问题,并调查这些问题是否与痴呆有关。方法:从临床护理人员评定工具中选择与活动能力相关的项目,并根据两个时间点的评估来评估参与者的痴呆状态。Fisher的精确测试被用于有和没有疑似痴呆的组之间的比较。Logistic回归,调整年龄和ID水平,用于调查活动能力和随后的痴呆之间的关系。结果:基线时(N = 85),中位年龄为58岁,39%为女性,37%为21三体。超过50%的参与者存在疼痛和身体耐力低下的问题。体力耐力低在疑似痴呆的参与者中比在没有疑似痴呆的参与者中更为普遍(p = 0.016)。经年龄和ID水平调整后,低体力耐力与6年后痴呆相关(OR 9.349, p = 0.019)。结论:当结合其他观察结果时,低身体耐力可以帮助护理人员识别应该转介进行痴呆评估的ID患者。然而,结果需要在更大的样本中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书