Implementing a direct support staff intervention in services for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour using the ItFits framework: From needs to action.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Petri J C M Embregts, Steffan Widdershoven, Suzanne Lokman, Fleur van Hoof, Laurie de Werdt, Noud Frielink
{"title":"Implementing a direct support staff intervention in services for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour using the ItFits framework: From needs to action.","authors":"Petri J C M Embregts, Steffan Widdershoven, Suzanne Lokman, Fleur van Hoof, Laurie de Werdt, Noud Frielink","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2026.2707840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective interventions often fail to achieve lasting impact due to implementation barriers. This study examined how <i>Support Staff in the Spotlight</i> - an intervention that enhances emotional intelligence and interactional awareness among support staff working with service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour - can be embedded in daily routines within intellectual disability care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation-design guided by the ItFits-framework, two Dutch care organisations completed a two-part-process: a <i>needs assessment</i> to identify barriers and facilitators, followed by <i>communities of practice</i> where key stakeholders co-created and refined tailored strategies. Data from focus-groups, structured logs, and interviews were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The process helped to translate identified needs into concrete actions, such as adapting video-feedback procedures and embedding reflection in team routines. Organisational capacity, managerial continuity, and psychological safety were decisive for sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leadership engagement and routinised reflection moments were crucial for sustaining staff-focused interventions in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2026.2707840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective interventions often fail to achieve lasting impact due to implementation barriers. This study examined how Support Staff in the Spotlight - an intervention that enhances emotional intelligence and interactional awareness among support staff working with service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour - can be embedded in daily routines within intellectual disability care.

Method: Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation-design guided by the ItFits-framework, two Dutch care organisations completed a two-part-process: a needs assessment to identify barriers and facilitators, followed by communities of practice where key stakeholders co-created and refined tailored strategies. Data from focus-groups, structured logs, and interviews were analysed thematically.

Results: The process helped to translate identified needs into concrete actions, such as adapting video-feedback procedures and embedding reflection in team routines. Organisational capacity, managerial continuity, and psychological safety were decisive for sustainability.

Conclusion: Leadership engagement and routinised reflection moments were crucial for sustaining staff-focused interventions in practice.

使用ItFits框架,在为智障人士和挑战行为的服务中实施直接支持人员干预:从需求到行动。
背景:由于实施障碍,有效的干预措施往往无法产生持久影响。这项研究考察了如何将“聚光灯下的支持人员”(一项干预措施,旨在提高与智障和具有挑战性行为的服务用户一起工作的支持人员的情商和互动意识)融入到智障护理的日常工作中。方法:在itfits框架的指导下,两家荷兰护理组织采用了混合的有效性-实施-设计,完成了两个部分的过程:需求评估,以确定障碍和促进因素,然后是实践社区,主要利益相关者共同制定和完善量身定制的战略。来自焦点小组、结构化日志和访谈的数据按主题进行分析。结果:该过程有助于将确定的需求转化为具体的行动,例如调整视频反馈程序和在团队日常工作中嵌入反思。组织能力、管理连续性和心理安全是可持续发展的决定性因素。结论:领导参与和常规的反思时刻对于在实践中维持以员工为中心的干预至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书