Friend and Neighbour Ties Among Unpartnered, Childless and ‘Kinless’ Older Adults in Europe

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Christine A. Mair
{"title":"Friend and Neighbour Ties Among Unpartnered, Childless and ‘Kinless’ Older Adults in Europe","authors":"Christine A. Mair","doi":"10.1002/psp.70368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Declining fertility, increased geographic mobility and changes in nuclear families have contributed to the rise of older adults who are unpartnered, childless or both unpartnered and childless (‘kinless’). For this growing global population, non-family ties such as friends and neighbours may be particularly important. Although often conflated, friends and neighbours represent distinct ties that often provide different resources, with neighbours being geographically proximal and friends being geographically flexible. Yet, very few cross-national studies distinguish between friends and neighbours, and no study to date has examined these ties among older adults with limited family availability cross-nationally. To address this gap, I analyze social network data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (Wave 6; <i>N</i> = 56,093 respondents across 17 countries) and country-level indicators from multiple sources. Using multivariable logistic regression models, I examine whether older adults lacking partners and/or children are more likely to list a friend compared to a neighbour in their discussion networks and explore how these patterns vary across macro-level contexts. Lacking family is associated with greater reliance on non-family ties, and friend ties are substantially more common than neighbour ties in all countries and contexts. Friend ties are particularly more common for kinless older adults in Northern and Western Europe, especially in higher-GDP contexts. Although neighbour ties are much less common overall, they are more pronounced in lower-GDP and Southern European contexts. These findings highlight heterogeneity in later-life support systems and underscore the importance of both geographically-bounded and geographically-flexible support ties to promote ‘aging in place’ and ‘aging in networks’, respectively.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"32 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Declining fertility, increased geographic mobility and changes in nuclear families have contributed to the rise of older adults who are unpartnered, childless or both unpartnered and childless (‘kinless’). For this growing global population, non-family ties such as friends and neighbours may be particularly important. Although often conflated, friends and neighbours represent distinct ties that often provide different resources, with neighbours being geographically proximal and friends being geographically flexible. Yet, very few cross-national studies distinguish between friends and neighbours, and no study to date has examined these ties among older adults with limited family availability cross-nationally. To address this gap, I analyze social network data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (Wave 6; N = 56,093 respondents across 17 countries) and country-level indicators from multiple sources. Using multivariable logistic regression models, I examine whether older adults lacking partners and/or children are more likely to list a friend compared to a neighbour in their discussion networks and explore how these patterns vary across macro-level contexts. Lacking family is associated with greater reliance on non-family ties, and friend ties are substantially more common than neighbour ties in all countries and contexts. Friend ties are particularly more common for kinless older adults in Northern and Western Europe, especially in higher-GDP contexts. Although neighbour ties are much less common overall, they are more pronounced in lower-GDP and Southern European contexts. These findings highlight heterogeneity in later-life support systems and underscore the importance of both geographically-bounded and geographically-flexible support ties to promote ‘aging in place’ and ‘aging in networks’, respectively.

欧洲单身、无子女和无亲属老年人的朋友和邻居关系
生育率下降、地域流动性增加以及核心家庭的变化导致无伴侣、无子女或既无伴侣又无子女(“无亲属”)的老年人增加。对于不断增长的全球人口来说,朋友和邻居等非家庭关系可能尤为重要。虽然经常被混为一谈,但朋友和邻居代表着不同的关系,通常提供不同的资源,邻居在地理上是近的,朋友在地理上是灵活的。然而,很少有跨国研究区分朋友和邻居之间的关系,迄今为止,也没有研究在跨国范围内考察家庭可用性有限的老年人之间的这种关系。为了解决这一差距,我分析了来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(第6轮;17个国家的56,093名受访者)的社交网络数据和来自多个来源的国家级指标。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,我研究了缺乏伴侣和/或孩子的老年人是否更有可能在他们的讨论网络中列出朋友而不是邻居,并探索这些模式如何在宏观层面上下文中变化。缺乏家庭与更多地依赖非家庭关系有关,在所有国家和背景下,朋友关系比邻居关系普遍得多。在北欧和西欧,朋友关系对于没有亲属的老年人来说尤为普遍,尤其是在GDP较高的国家。虽然邻国关系总体上不太常见,但在GDP较低和南欧的背景下,这种关系更为明显。这些发现强调了晚年生活支持系统的异质性,并强调了地理上有界限和地理上灵活的支持关系对促进“就地老龄化”和“网络老龄化”的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书