Cognitive Flexibility, Inhibitory Control, and Trajectories of Irritability from Late Childhood Through Early Adolescence.

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Shannon Shaughnessy, Spencer C Evans
{"title":"Cognitive Flexibility, Inhibitory Control, and Trajectories of Irritability from Late Childhood Through Early Adolescence.","authors":"Shannon Shaughnessy, Spencer C Evans","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2026.2724276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Irritability is associated with an array of deleterious outcomes, yet research examining developmental antecedents is limited. The present study addresses this gap by examining cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control as predictors of irritability from late childhood through early adolescence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A second-order latent growth curve model (LGCM) was constructed to investigate irritability across ages 9-13 using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (<i>N</i> = 11,720, 47.9% female). Cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control were examined as predictors. Sensitivity analyses controlled for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, defiance, and biological sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-fitting unconditional LGCM showed a modest but significant linear decline in irritability from late childhood through early adolescence, with significant inter-individual variability. In conditional LGCMs, lower levels of cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control at baseline predicted higher levels of irritability at baseline and a faster decline in irritability over time. The effects of cognitive variables on irritability trajectories were attenuated to non-significance when ADHD symptoms, defiance, and biological sex were included as covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a large, nationally representative sample, this study characterizes the average trajectory of irritability from late childhood through early adolescence. Results suggest that while there appears to be a concurrent effect of cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control on irritability, this may diminish over time. Moreover, ADHD symptoms, defiance, and biological sex may play a more central role. Future research should investigate these associations under frustration, when cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control are key.</p>","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2026.2724276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Irritability is associated with an array of deleterious outcomes, yet research examining developmental antecedents is limited. The present study addresses this gap by examining cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control as predictors of irritability from late childhood through early adolescence.

Method: A second-order latent growth curve model (LGCM) was constructed to investigate irritability across ages 9-13 using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (N = 11,720, 47.9% female). Cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control were examined as predictors. Sensitivity analyses controlled for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, defiance, and biological sex.

Results: The best-fitting unconditional LGCM showed a modest but significant linear decline in irritability from late childhood through early adolescence, with significant inter-individual variability. In conditional LGCMs, lower levels of cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control at baseline predicted higher levels of irritability at baseline and a faster decline in irritability over time. The effects of cognitive variables on irritability trajectories were attenuated to non-significance when ADHD symptoms, defiance, and biological sex were included as covariates.

Conclusion: Using a large, nationally representative sample, this study characterizes the average trajectory of irritability from late childhood through early adolescence. Results suggest that while there appears to be a concurrent effect of cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control on irritability, this may diminish over time. Moreover, ADHD symptoms, defiance, and biological sex may play a more central role. Future research should investigate these associations under frustration, when cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control are key.

认知灵活性、抑制控制和从儿童期晚期到青春期早期的易怒轨迹。
目的:易怒与一系列有害的结果有关,但研究发展前因是有限的。本研究通过研究认知灵活性和抑制控制作为童年晚期到青春期早期易怒的预测因素来解决这一差距。方法:利用青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的数据,构建二阶潜在生长曲线模型(LGCM),对9-13岁青少年的易怒行为进行调查。认知灵活性和抑制控制作为预测因子。敏感性分析控制了注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状、蔑视和生理性别。结果:最合适的无条件LGCM显示,从童年晚期到青春期早期,易怒程度有适度但显著的线性下降,具有显著的个体间差异。在条条性lgcm中,基线认知灵活性和抑制控制水平较低预示着基线时易怒程度较高,随着时间的推移,易怒程度下降得更快。当将ADHD症状、反抗和生理性别作为协变量时,认知变量对易怒轨迹的影响减弱到不显著。结论:本研究使用了大量具有全国代表性的样本,描绘了从童年晚期到青春期早期易怒的平均轨迹。研究结果表明,虽然认知灵活性和抑制控制似乎同时对易怒有影响,但这种影响可能会随着时间的推移而减弱。此外,ADHD症状、蔑视和生理性别可能起着更重要的作用。未来的研究应该在认知灵活性和抑制控制是关键的挫折下调查这些关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书