"My Body Thinks This is Real": A Qualitative Study of Fourth Year Medical Student Perspectives on Learning and Realism in Complex Simulation.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer McConnell, Cameron Wynn, Ailyn Clara, Prachi Singh, Jeanne Carey, Rory Nicolaides, Ngoc Kim Van Horn, Jenny K R Francis
{"title":"\"My Body Thinks This is Real\": A Qualitative Study of Fourth Year Medical Student Perspectives on Learning and Realism in Complex Simulation.","authors":"Jennifer McConnell, Cameron Wynn, Ailyn Clara, Prachi Singh, Jeanne Carey, Rory Nicolaides, Ngoc Kim Van Horn, Jenny K R Francis","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation-based education is important to medical training, yet the relationship between realism, learner engagement, and learning remains debated. Realism is often equated with technological sophistication, though contemporary frameworks emphasize realism as multifactorial. This qualitative study aimed to explore how graduating medical students perceive realism, characterize engagement, and describe learning in a complex simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourth-year medical students at an academic center participated in The Shift Change, a complex multi-room inpatient simulation during a pediatrics transition-to-residency course in March 2024. Semi-structured individual and group virtual interviews were conducted with 20 students within 3 weeks of the simulation. Verbatim transcripts underwent iterative qualitative analysis using a constant comparative method to identify categories and organize broader themes describing how realism, engagement and learning were experienced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students described experiences through 4 interrelated themes, summarized as the \"5 Ps\": preparation, production, presence and participation, and processing. Background experiences prepared students for learning. The production of the simulation through narrative coherence, a physical simulation space, and thoughtful facilitation was described as supporting presence and authentic participation, thereby generating engagement that students perceived as shaping realism and learning. Processing through emotions, observation and debriefing was described as solidifying lessons and extending perceived learning to future practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, graduating medical students described experiences of realism and engagement in a complex simulation through the 5 Ps: preparation, production, presence and participation, and processing. The 5 Ps represent an interpretative analysis of student experiences, highlighting perceived realism, engagement, and learning. These findings may help inform future exploration of simulations designed for undergraduate to graduate medical education transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation-based education is important to medical training, yet the relationship between realism, learner engagement, and learning remains debated. Realism is often equated with technological sophistication, though contemporary frameworks emphasize realism as multifactorial. This qualitative study aimed to explore how graduating medical students perceive realism, characterize engagement, and describe learning in a complex simulation.

Methods: Fourth-year medical students at an academic center participated in The Shift Change, a complex multi-room inpatient simulation during a pediatrics transition-to-residency course in March 2024. Semi-structured individual and group virtual interviews were conducted with 20 students within 3 weeks of the simulation. Verbatim transcripts underwent iterative qualitative analysis using a constant comparative method to identify categories and organize broader themes describing how realism, engagement and learning were experienced.

Results: Students described experiences through 4 interrelated themes, summarized as the "5 Ps": preparation, production, presence and participation, and processing. Background experiences prepared students for learning. The production of the simulation through narrative coherence, a physical simulation space, and thoughtful facilitation was described as supporting presence and authentic participation, thereby generating engagement that students perceived as shaping realism and learning. Processing through emotions, observation and debriefing was described as solidifying lessons and extending perceived learning to future practice.

Conclusions: In this study, graduating medical students described experiences of realism and engagement in a complex simulation through the 5 Ps: preparation, production, presence and participation, and processing. The 5 Ps represent an interpretative analysis of student experiences, highlighting perceived realism, engagement, and learning. These findings may help inform future exploration of simulations designed for undergraduate to graduate medical education transitions.

“我的身体认为这是真实的”:四年级医学生在复杂模拟中的学习和现实主义观点的定性研究。
基于模拟的教育对医学培训很重要,但现实主义、学习者参与和学习之间的关系仍存在争议。现实主义通常等同于技术的复杂性,尽管当代框架强调现实主义是多因素的。本质性研究旨在探讨即将毕业的医学生如何在复杂的模拟中感知现实主义、表征参与和描述学习。方法:某学术中心的四年级医学生于2024年3月在儿科过渡到住院医师课程期间参加了复杂的多室住院模拟。在模拟的三周内,对20名学生进行了半结构化的个人和团体虚拟访谈。逐字记录经过反复的定性分析,使用恒定的比较方法来确定类别并组织更广泛的主题,描述现实主义,参与和学习的经历。结果:学生通过4个相互关联的主题描述经验,总结为“5p”:准备、生产、在场和参与以及处理。背景经验为学生的学习做准备。通过叙事连贯、物理模拟空间和深思熟虑的便利来制作模拟,被描述为支持存在和真实的参与,从而产生学生认为塑造现实主义和学习的参与。通过情绪、观察和汇报进行的处理被描述为巩固经验教训,并将感知到的学习扩展到未来的实践中。结论:在本研究中,即将毕业的医学生通过5p描述了在复杂模拟中的现实主义和参与体验:准备、生产、在场和参与以及处理。5p代表了对学生经历的解释性分析,强调了感知的现实性、参与度和学习。这些发现可能有助于未来探索为本科到研究生医学教育过渡设计的模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书