The Impact of Integrated Active Learning Strategies on Student Satisfaction and Academic Performance in Histology Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2026-06-18 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-026-02792-7
Maryam Ghaemi-Amiri, Soraya Khafri, Fatemeh Rajati, Zahra Babazadeh
{"title":"The Impact of Integrated Active Learning Strategies on Student Satisfaction and Academic Performance in Histology Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Maryam Ghaemi-Amiri, Soraya Khafri, Fatemeh Rajati, Zahra Babazadeh","doi":"10.1007/s40670-026-02792-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Histology education faces significant challenges due to its abstract content and compressed curricula, with limited comparative evidence on integrated active learning strategies across diverse student groups. A quasi-experimental study at Babol University of Medical Sciences involved students from eight disciplines. Satisfaction was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale from 314 out of 373 active learning students (Flipped Classroom/FC, Small Group Learning/SGL, Teacher Role-Playing/TRP) and 213 out of 365 traditional teaching students. Academic performance was compared using final exam scores from all active learning (<i>n</i> = 373) and traditional (<i>n</i> = 365) students over five semesters. Satisfaction was significantly higher in all active learning groups compared to traditional teaching (3.468 ± 0.067; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Flipped Classroom achieved the highest satisfaction (3.974 ± 0.051), but didn't show significantly difference with other active groups (Small Group Learning (3.920 ± 0.051, and Teacher Role-Playing (3.897 ± 0.056). Satisfaction correlated with improved motivation, retention, and comprehension. Male students reported higher satisfaction. Teacher Role-Playing satisfaction varied significantly by discipline (<i>p</i> = 0.026), being highest in Anatomical Sciences and lowest in Speech Therapy. Academic performance was superior across active learning groups, with the greatest gains among graduate students (<i>p</i> = 0.0285) and in medium/large classes (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). In conclusion, the integrated active learning strategies significantly enhance both student satisfaction and academic achievement in histology education. Effectiveness is moderated by gender, discipline, academic level, and class size, supporting the adoption of tailored, student-centered approaches to address engagement and curricular challenges in health sciences.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02792-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"36 4","pages":"1933-1944"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13582739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02792-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Histology education faces significant challenges due to its abstract content and compressed curricula, with limited comparative evidence on integrated active learning strategies across diverse student groups. A quasi-experimental study at Babol University of Medical Sciences involved students from eight disciplines. Satisfaction was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale from 314 out of 373 active learning students (Flipped Classroom/FC, Small Group Learning/SGL, Teacher Role-Playing/TRP) and 213 out of 365 traditional teaching students. Academic performance was compared using final exam scores from all active learning (n = 373) and traditional (n = 365) students over five semesters. Satisfaction was significantly higher in all active learning groups compared to traditional teaching (3.468 ± 0.067; p < 0.0001). Flipped Classroom achieved the highest satisfaction (3.974 ± 0.051), but didn't show significantly difference with other active groups (Small Group Learning (3.920 ± 0.051, and Teacher Role-Playing (3.897 ± 0.056). Satisfaction correlated with improved motivation, retention, and comprehension. Male students reported higher satisfaction. Teacher Role-Playing satisfaction varied significantly by discipline (p = 0.026), being highest in Anatomical Sciences and lowest in Speech Therapy. Academic performance was superior across active learning groups, with the greatest gains among graduate students (p = 0.0285) and in medium/large classes (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the integrated active learning strategies significantly enhance both student satisfaction and academic achievement in histology education. Effectiveness is moderated by gender, discipline, academic level, and class size, supporting the adoption of tailored, student-centered approaches to address engagement and curricular challenges in health sciences.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02792-7.

综合主动学习策略对组织学教育学生满意度和学习成绩的影响:一项准实验研究。
组织学教育由于其抽象的内容和压缩的课程而面临着巨大的挑战,在不同学生群体中整合主动学习策略的比较证据有限。在巴博尔医科大学进行的一项准实验研究涉及来自八个学科的学生。满意度通过5分李克特量表进行评估,373名主动学习学生中有314名(翻转课堂/FC,小组学习/SGL,教师角色扮演/TRP)和365名传统教学学生中的213名。在五个学期中,对所有主动学习学生(n = 373)和传统学习学生(n = 365)的期末考试成绩进行了比较。各主动学习组学生满意度均高于传统教学组(3.468±0.067;p p = 0.026),其中解剖学组满意度最高,语言治疗组满意度最低。在积极学习小组中,学生的学习成绩都很好,其中研究生(p = 0.0285)和中/大班(p)的成绩最好。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可在https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02792-7上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书