Evaluating the Educational Impact of an Image-Based Assessment Tool in a Gross Anatomy Laboratory Course: A Thematic and Quantitative Analysis of Student Experiences.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2026-05-28 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-026-02768-7
Mais Abdelhaq, Timothy Dasinger, Yuefeng Lu, Oheneba Boadum
{"title":"Evaluating the Educational Impact of an Image-Based Assessment Tool in a Gross Anatomy Laboratory Course: A Thematic and Quantitative Analysis of Student Experiences.","authors":"Mais Abdelhaq, Timothy Dasinger, Yuefeng Lu, Oheneba Boadum","doi":"10.1007/s40670-026-02768-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning anatomy remains challenging due to complex terminology, intricate 3D relationships, and the extensive amount of material students must master. While dissection laboratories provide valuable tactile and spatial learning, they often lack structured mechanisms to foster independent preparation and reflective consolidation. The Image-Based Assessment Tool was designed as a structured, student-centered adjunct to facilitate pre- and post-laboratory experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study employed quantitative paired-sample analyses and qualitative thematic analysis to examine 40 first-year dental students' experiences with the tool. The tool comprised pre- and post-laboratory image identification components. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired-samples t-tests and Qualitative data thematically analyzed following Braun and Clarke's method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analyses showed trend increases in both pre- and post-laboratory scores from Block 1 to Block 3, suggesting improved performance. Qualitative responses from all forty students yielded thirteen themes, which were organized into three overarching domains: (1) Preparatory visualization and cognitive readiness, (2) Collaborative and integrative learning, and (3) Reflective reinforcement and metacognitive growth. These domains collectively describe how students perceived this as a supporting tool before, during, and after cadaveric dissection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The structured use of this tool facilitated a cycle of preparatory visualization, collaborative engagement, and reflective reinforcement that deepened anatomical understanding. By supporting cognitive readiness, peer interaction, and metacognitive reflection across pre- and post-laboratory, the tool strengthened students' ability to integrate visual-spatial and conceptual knowledge. This tool may serve as effective adjuncts in anatomy curricula, promoting active and reflective learning that enhances long-term retention and learner autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"36 4","pages":"1785-1796"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13582764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02768-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Learning anatomy remains challenging due to complex terminology, intricate 3D relationships, and the extensive amount of material students must master. While dissection laboratories provide valuable tactile and spatial learning, they often lack structured mechanisms to foster independent preparation and reflective consolidation. The Image-Based Assessment Tool was designed as a structured, student-centered adjunct to facilitate pre- and post-laboratory experience.

Methods: This mixed-methods study employed quantitative paired-sample analyses and qualitative thematic analysis to examine 40 first-year dental students' experiences with the tool. The tool comprised pre- and post-laboratory image identification components. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired-samples t-tests and Qualitative data thematically analyzed following Braun and Clarke's method.

Results: Quantitative analyses showed trend increases in both pre- and post-laboratory scores from Block 1 to Block 3, suggesting improved performance. Qualitative responses from all forty students yielded thirteen themes, which were organized into three overarching domains: (1) Preparatory visualization and cognitive readiness, (2) Collaborative and integrative learning, and (3) Reflective reinforcement and metacognitive growth. These domains collectively describe how students perceived this as a supporting tool before, during, and after cadaveric dissection.

Conclusion: The structured use of this tool facilitated a cycle of preparatory visualization, collaborative engagement, and reflective reinforcement that deepened anatomical understanding. By supporting cognitive readiness, peer interaction, and metacognitive reflection across pre- and post-laboratory, the tool strengthened students' ability to integrate visual-spatial and conceptual knowledge. This tool may serve as effective adjuncts in anatomy curricula, promoting active and reflective learning that enhances long-term retention and learner autonomy.

评估大体解剖实验课程中基于图像的评估工具的教育影响:学生经验的主题和定量分析。
背景:学习解剖学仍然具有挑战性,由于复杂的术语,复杂的3D关系,和大量的材料,学生必须掌握。虽然解剖实验室提供了宝贵的触觉和空间学习,但它们往往缺乏结构化的机制来培养独立的准备和反思巩固。基于图像的评估工具被设计成一个结构化的、以学生为中心的辅助工具,以促进实验前和实验后的体验。方法:本研究采用定量配对样本分析和定性专题分析,对40名一年级牙科学生使用该工具的经历进行了调查。该工具包括实验室前和实验室后的图像识别组件。定量数据采用配对样本t检验进行分析,定性数据采用Braun和Clarke的方法进行主题分析。结果:定量分析显示,从第1块到第3块,实验前和实验后的分数都有上升趋势,表明成绩有所提高。所有40名学生的定性回答产生了13个主题,这些主题分为三个主要领域:(1)预备可视化和认知准备,(2)协作和整合学习,(3)反思强化和元认知成长。这些领域共同描述了学生在尸体解剖之前,期间和之后如何将其视为支持工具。结论:该工具的结构化使用促进了预备可视化、协作参与和反射强化的循环,从而加深了解剖学的理解。通过支持实验前后的认知准备、同伴互动和元认知反思,该工具增强了学生整合视觉空间和概念知识的能力。该工具可以作为解剖学课程的有效辅助,促进主动和反思性学习,提高长期记忆和学习者的自主性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书