Strengthening Capacity in Primary Palliative Care: A Scoping Review from Latin America and the Caribbean.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rebecca L Edwards, Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior, Francisca Marquez Doren, Regina Aparecida Garcia de Lima, Aintzane Gallastegui-Braña, Kanchana Bandara-Coore, Karen Cox, Barbara Reville, Lisa Theus, Rebecca Billings, Mark Stoltenberg, Adelais Markaki
{"title":"Strengthening Capacity in Primary Palliative Care: A Scoping Review from Latin America and the Caribbean.","authors":"Rebecca L Edwards, Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior, Francisca Marquez Doren, Regina Aparecida Garcia de Lima, Aintzane Gallastegui-Braña, Kanchana Bandara-Coore, Karen Cox, Barbara Reville, Lisa Theus, Rebecca Billings, Mark Stoltenberg, Adelais Markaki","doi":"10.1177/10966218261486731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary palliative care (PPC) is widely recognized as essential for equitable palliative care access, yet evidence on its integration across Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) remains limited. This scoping review synthesized evidence on strategies, opportunities, and challenges shaping PPC integration throughout the region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, peer-reviewed and gray literature published from 2014 to February 2025 were searched across eight databases and relevant sources. Using population-concept-context criteria, articles addressing PPC integration within primary health care (PHC) in LAC were included. Directed content analysis was framed by the World Health Organization (WHO) Conceptual Model of Palliative Care Development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six articles representing 30 LAC countries met inclusion criteria. Available evidence suggested uneven progress in PPC integration across settings. Common strategies included workforce development and task-sharing approaches; nurse- and community health worker-led care models; incorporation of PPC into chronic disease management and home-based care pathways; and evolving policy frameworks supporting PHC-based delivery. Persistent barriers involved limited workforce capacity; fragmentation between primary and specialist services; restricted availability of essential palliative medicines, particularly opioids; and sociocultural and regulatory constraints. Although findings mapped onto all domains of the WHO model, several region-specific subcomponents emerged: (a) tailored and structured caregiver engagement, (b) academic-policy partnerships and benchmarking mechanisms, (c) telehealth-enabled and networked PPC models, (d) advanced practice nurse- and nurse-led mentoring structures, (e) standardized screening linked to actionable PHC responses, and (f) early PPC pathways adapted to regional disease burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integration of PPC is progressing yet remains constrained by structural, regulatory, and implementation gaps. Bridging policy commitments with routine PHC delivery requires strengthened workforce capacity, improved access to essential medicines, and implementation-focused research to inform scalable, context-sensitive, and equitable PPC models across diverse LAC health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10966218261486731"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218261486731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Primary palliative care (PPC) is widely recognized as essential for equitable palliative care access, yet evidence on its integration across Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) remains limited. This scoping review synthesized evidence on strategies, opportunities, and challenges shaping PPC integration throughout the region.

Methods: Guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, peer-reviewed and gray literature published from 2014 to February 2025 were searched across eight databases and relevant sources. Using population-concept-context criteria, articles addressing PPC integration within primary health care (PHC) in LAC were included. Directed content analysis was framed by the World Health Organization (WHO) Conceptual Model of Palliative Care Development.

Results: Forty-six articles representing 30 LAC countries met inclusion criteria. Available evidence suggested uneven progress in PPC integration across settings. Common strategies included workforce development and task-sharing approaches; nurse- and community health worker-led care models; incorporation of PPC into chronic disease management and home-based care pathways; and evolving policy frameworks supporting PHC-based delivery. Persistent barriers involved limited workforce capacity; fragmentation between primary and specialist services; restricted availability of essential palliative medicines, particularly opioids; and sociocultural and regulatory constraints. Although findings mapped onto all domains of the WHO model, several region-specific subcomponents emerged: (a) tailored and structured caregiver engagement, (b) academic-policy partnerships and benchmarking mechanisms, (c) telehealth-enabled and networked PPC models, (d) advanced practice nurse- and nurse-led mentoring structures, (e) standardized screening linked to actionable PHC responses, and (f) early PPC pathways adapted to regional disease burden.

Conclusions: Integration of PPC is progressing yet remains constrained by structural, regulatory, and implementation gaps. Bridging policy commitments with routine PHC delivery requires strengthened workforce capacity, improved access to essential medicines, and implementation-focused research to inform scalable, context-sensitive, and equitable PPC models across diverse LAC health systems.

加强初级姑息治疗能力:来自拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的范围审查。
初级姑息治疗(PPC)被广泛认为是公平获得姑息治疗的关键,但在整个拉丁美洲和加勒比地区(LAC)关于其整合的证据仍然有限。这一范围审查综合了影响整个区域PPC整合的战略、机遇和挑战的证据。方法:在PRISMA扩展范围评估和Joanna Briggs研究所方法的指导下,检索2014年至2025年2月在8个数据库和相关来源中发表的同行评议和灰色文献。使用人口-概念-环境标准,纳入了关于在拉丁美洲和加勒比地区初级卫生保健(PHC)中整合PPC的文章。定向内容分析是由世界卫生组织(世卫组织)姑息治疗发展概念模型框架。结果:代表30个LAC国家的46篇文章符合纳入标准。现有证据表明,PPC整合在不同环境中的进展不均衡。共同的战略包括劳动力发展和任务分担方法;护士和社区卫生工作者主导的护理模式;将PPC纳入慢性病管理和家庭护理途径;支持以初级保健为基础的服务的不断发展的政策框架。持续存在的障碍包括有限的劳动力能力;初级服务和专门服务之间的分割;限制基本姑息药物,特别是阿片类药物的供应;以及社会文化和监管约束。尽管研究结果映射到世卫组织模式的所有领域,但出现了几个特定区域的子组成部分:(a)量身定制和结构化的护理人员参与,(b)学术政策伙伴关系和基准机制,(c)远程医疗支持和网络化的PPC模式,(d)高级执业护士和护士主导的指导结构,(e)与可操作的初级保健响应相关的标准化筛查,以及(f)适应区域疾病负担的早期PPC途径。结论:PPC的整合正在取得进展,但仍受到结构、监管和实施差距的制约。将政策承诺与常规初级保健服务衔接起来,需要加强劳动力能力,改善基本药物的可及性,并开展以实施为重点的研究,为拉丁美洲和加勒比地区不同卫生系统的可扩展、环境敏感和公平的初级保健服务模式提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书