Supporting adults with intellectual disabilities to be more involved in decisions about their mental health medications: A co-produced mixed methods study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sue Caton, Dawn Cavanagh, Katherine Runswick-Cole, Chris Hatton, Francesca Ribenfors, Nathan Rawcliffe, Umesh Chauhan, Christine Hutchinson, Matty Prothero, Jodie Rawles, Mark O'Farrell, Vicky Farnsworth, Jodie Bradley, Alison Owen, Robert Parkin
{"title":"Supporting adults with intellectual disabilities to be more involved in decisions about their mental health medications: A co-produced mixed methods study.","authors":"Sue Caton, Dawn Cavanagh, Katherine Runswick-Cole, Chris Hatton, Francesca Ribenfors, Nathan Rawcliffe, Umesh Chauhan, Christine Hutchinson, Matty Prothero, Jodie Rawles, Mark O'Farrell, Vicky Farnsworth, Jodie Bradley, Alison Owen, Robert Parkin","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2026.2729575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with intellectual disabilities are more likely to take mental health (psychotropic) medications than other people. Despite long-standing concern about this, there has been little focus on how people with intellectual disabilities can be supported to be more involved in decisions about their medications.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This co-produced study included interviews (<i>N</i> = 40) and an online survey (<i>N</i> = 134) with people with intellectual disabilities, family members, paid carers and prescribers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was most commonly medical professionals who made decisions about medications, despite most participants stating that it was the people who take the medications who should make decisions. Very few people with intellectual disabilities had been given written information in an accessible format.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prescribers, family members and paid carers should adopt relational approaches to decision making and use accessible resources to support the involvement of people with intellectual disabilities in decisions about their mental health medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2026.2729575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disabilities are more likely to take mental health (psychotropic) medications than other people. Despite long-standing concern about this, there has been little focus on how people with intellectual disabilities can be supported to be more involved in decisions about their medications.

Method: This co-produced study included interviews (N = 40) and an online survey (N = 134) with people with intellectual disabilities, family members, paid carers and prescribers.

Results: It was most commonly medical professionals who made decisions about medications, despite most participants stating that it was the people who take the medications who should make decisions. Very few people with intellectual disabilities had been given written information in an accessible format.

Conclusion: Prescribers, family members and paid carers should adopt relational approaches to decision making and use accessible resources to support the involvement of people with intellectual disabilities in decisions about their mental health medications.

支持有智力障碍的成年人更多地参与他们心理健康药物的决定:一项联合生产的混合方法研究。
背景:智力残疾者比其他人更有可能服用精神健康(精神药物)。尽管长期以来人们对此感到担忧,但很少有人关注如何支持智障人士更多地参与他们的药物决策。方法:本研究包括访谈(N = 40)和在线调查(N = 134),对象包括智障人士、其家庭成员、有偿护理人员和处方医师。结果:最常见的是由医疗专业人员做出药物决定,尽管大多数参与者表示应该由服用药物的人做出决定。很少有智力残疾者获得无障碍格式的书面信息。结论:处方医师、家庭成员和有偿照护者应采用关系决策方法,并利用可获得的资源支持智障人士参与其心理健康药物的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书