Utility of IL-18 Immunohistochemistry in Distinguishing Dermatomyositis and Lupus Erythematosus in Skin Biopsies.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Steven M Hrycaj, Joseph S Durgin, Johann E Gudjonsson, J Michelle Kahlenberg, Gaidaa R Majari, Carole Bitar, Catherine G Chung, Rosalynn M Nazarian, May P Chan
{"title":"Utility of IL-18 Immunohistochemistry in Distinguishing Dermatomyositis and Lupus Erythematosus in Skin Biopsies.","authors":"Steven M Hrycaj, Joseph S Durgin, Johann E Gudjonsson, J Michelle Kahlenberg, Gaidaa R Majari, Carole Bitar, Catherine G Chung, Rosalynn M Nazarian, May P Chan","doi":"10.1111/cup.70214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinction of dermatomyositis (DM) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) in skin biopsies is often difficult due to significant histopathologic overlap. Prior transcriptional analysis has identified upregulation of IL-18 in DM compared with LE. We aimed to assess its utility as an immunohistochemical marker in this differential diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Skin biopsies classified as DM (n = 35) or LE (n = 32) were immunostained with an IL-18 antibody. A positive IL-18 result was defined as presence of full-thickness epidermal staining of medium or strong intensity. Absent, weak, or partial-thickness staining was considered negative. Results were compared between groups by Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IL-18 expression in keratinocytes, when present, was consistently cytoplasmic with or without nuclear positivity. Twenty-eight (80%) DM cases and 11 (34%) LE cases were positive for IL-18 (p = 0.0002). A positive result had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 66% for DM. Specifically, strong full-thickness staining was only observed in DM (five cases; p = 0.05), whereas complete absence of epidermal staining was seen exclusively in LE (five cases; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IL-18 immunohistochemistry can be a useful diagnostic adjunct in distinguishing DM and LE in a small subset of skin biopsies when staining is strong or completely absent. Correlation with clinical and histopathologic findings remains imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":15407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cup.70214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distinction of dermatomyositis (DM) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) in skin biopsies is often difficult due to significant histopathologic overlap. Prior transcriptional analysis has identified upregulation of IL-18 in DM compared with LE. We aimed to assess its utility as an immunohistochemical marker in this differential diagnosis.

Methods: Skin biopsies classified as DM (n = 35) or LE (n = 32) were immunostained with an IL-18 antibody. A positive IL-18 result was defined as presence of full-thickness epidermal staining of medium or strong intensity. Absent, weak, or partial-thickness staining was considered negative. Results were compared between groups by Fisher's exact test.

Results: IL-18 expression in keratinocytes, when present, was consistently cytoplasmic with or without nuclear positivity. Twenty-eight (80%) DM cases and 11 (34%) LE cases were positive for IL-18 (p = 0.0002). A positive result had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 66% for DM. Specifically, strong full-thickness staining was only observed in DM (five cases; p = 0.05), whereas complete absence of epidermal staining was seen exclusively in LE (five cases; p = 0.02).

Conclusions: IL-18 immunohistochemistry can be a useful diagnostic adjunct in distinguishing DM and LE in a small subset of skin biopsies when staining is strong or completely absent. Correlation with clinical and histopathologic findings remains imperative.

IL-18免疫组织化学在皮肤活检中鉴别皮肌炎和红斑狼疮的应用。
背景:皮肌炎(DM)和皮肤红斑狼疮(LE)的皮肤活检往往是困难的,由于显著的组织病理重叠。先前的转录分析发现,与LE相比,IL-18在DM中上调。我们的目的是评估其作为免疫组织化学标志物在这种鉴别诊断中的效用。方法:对35例DM或32例LE皮肤活检患者进行IL-18抗体免疫染色。IL-18阳性定义为存在中等或强强度的全层表皮染色。无染色、弱染色或部分染色为阴性。采用Fisher精确检验比较各组结果。结果:白细胞介素-18在角质形成细胞中的表达,当存在时,始终是细胞质,有或没有核阳性。DM 28例(80%)、LE 11例(34%)IL-18阳性(p = 0.0002)。阳性结果对DM的敏感性为80%,特异性为66%。具体而言,仅在DM中观察到强烈的全层染色(5例,p = 0.05),而LE中完全没有表皮染色(5例,p = 0.02)。结论:IL-18免疫组织化学可以作为一种有用的诊断辅助手段,在染色强烈或完全没有染色的一小部分皮肤活检中区分DM和LE。与临床和组织病理学结果的相关性仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cutaneous Pathology publishes manuscripts broadly relevant to diseases of the skin and mucosae, with the aims of advancing scientific knowledge regarding dermatopathology and enhancing the communication between clinical practitioners and research scientists. Original scientific manuscripts on diagnostic and experimental cutaneous pathology are especially desirable. Timely, pertinent review articles also will be given high priority. Manuscripts based on light, fluorescence, and electron microscopy, histochemistry, immunology, molecular biology, and genetics, as well as allied sciences, are all welcome, provided their principal focus is on cutaneous pathology. Publication time will be kept as short as possible, ensuring that articles will be quickly available to all interested in this speciality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书