Steven M Hrycaj, Joseph S Durgin, Johann E Gudjonsson, J Michelle Kahlenberg, Gaidaa R Majari, Carole Bitar, Catherine G Chung, Rosalynn M Nazarian, May P Chan
{"title":"Utility of IL-18 Immunohistochemistry in Distinguishing Dermatomyositis and Lupus Erythematosus in Skin Biopsies.","authors":"Steven M Hrycaj, Joseph S Durgin, Johann E Gudjonsson, J Michelle Kahlenberg, Gaidaa R Majari, Carole Bitar, Catherine G Chung, Rosalynn M Nazarian, May P Chan","doi":"10.1111/cup.70214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinction of dermatomyositis (DM) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) in skin biopsies is often difficult due to significant histopathologic overlap. Prior transcriptional analysis has identified upregulation of IL-18 in DM compared with LE. We aimed to assess its utility as an immunohistochemical marker in this differential diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Skin biopsies classified as DM (n = 35) or LE (n = 32) were immunostained with an IL-18 antibody. A positive IL-18 result was defined as presence of full-thickness epidermal staining of medium or strong intensity. Absent, weak, or partial-thickness staining was considered negative. Results were compared between groups by Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IL-18 expression in keratinocytes, when present, was consistently cytoplasmic with or without nuclear positivity. Twenty-eight (80%) DM cases and 11 (34%) LE cases were positive for IL-18 (p = 0.0002). A positive result had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 66% for DM. Specifically, strong full-thickness staining was only observed in DM (five cases; p = 0.05), whereas complete absence of epidermal staining was seen exclusively in LE (five cases; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IL-18 immunohistochemistry can be a useful diagnostic adjunct in distinguishing DM and LE in a small subset of skin biopsies when staining is strong or completely absent. Correlation with clinical and histopathologic findings remains imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":15407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cup.70214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Distinction of dermatomyositis (DM) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) in skin biopsies is often difficult due to significant histopathologic overlap. Prior transcriptional analysis has identified upregulation of IL-18 in DM compared with LE. We aimed to assess its utility as an immunohistochemical marker in this differential diagnosis.
Methods: Skin biopsies classified as DM (n = 35) or LE (n = 32) were immunostained with an IL-18 antibody. A positive IL-18 result was defined as presence of full-thickness epidermal staining of medium or strong intensity. Absent, weak, or partial-thickness staining was considered negative. Results were compared between groups by Fisher's exact test.
Results: IL-18 expression in keratinocytes, when present, was consistently cytoplasmic with or without nuclear positivity. Twenty-eight (80%) DM cases and 11 (34%) LE cases were positive for IL-18 (p = 0.0002). A positive result had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 66% for DM. Specifically, strong full-thickness staining was only observed in DM (five cases; p = 0.05), whereas complete absence of epidermal staining was seen exclusively in LE (five cases; p = 0.02).
Conclusions: IL-18 immunohistochemistry can be a useful diagnostic adjunct in distinguishing DM and LE in a small subset of skin biopsies when staining is strong or completely absent. Correlation with clinical and histopathologic findings remains imperative.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology publishes manuscripts broadly relevant to diseases of the skin and mucosae, with the aims of advancing scientific knowledge regarding dermatopathology and enhancing the communication between clinical practitioners and research scientists. Original scientific manuscripts on diagnostic and experimental cutaneous pathology are especially desirable. Timely, pertinent review articles also will be given high priority. Manuscripts based on light, fluorescence, and electron microscopy, histochemistry, immunology, molecular biology, and genetics, as well as allied sciences, are all welcome, provided their principal focus is on cutaneous pathology. Publication time will be kept as short as possible, ensuring that articles will be quickly available to all interested in this speciality.