Fred Paas,Nadine Marcus,Kevin Sigayret,Peng Wang,Kim Ouwehand,Liye Zou
{"title":"Embodied guidance fading: When embodiment supports STEM learning by optimizing cognitive load","authors":"Fred Paas,Nadine Marcus,Kevin Sigayret,Peng Wang,Kim Ouwehand,Liye Zou","doi":"10.1080/00461520.2026.2717080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zhang et al.’s (2026) Perform First Hypothesis proposes that learners often benefit from direct sensorimotor action early in expertise development and from observing, imagining, or using abstract representations later. This commentary sharpens that proposal with cognitive load theory. We argue that action helps when it makes concept-relevant relations easier to process, such as when tracing a graph helps novices coordinate slope, variables, and change. Action can also hurt when it adds motor demands, redundant cues, or irrelevant activity without improving understanding. The central instructional aim is not movement or lower load for its own sake, but better learning, transfer, and flexible use of formal representations. We therefore reformulate the Perform First Hypothesis as embodied guidance fading: use the least embodied, task-relevant support needed for the learner’s current knowledge and the task’s element interactivity, then fade that support as schemas develop. This account yields concrete design principles, measurement recommendations, and testable predictions for embodied instruction in STEM.","PeriodicalId":48361,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychologist","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2026.2717080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Zhang et al.’s (2026) Perform First Hypothesis proposes that learners often benefit from direct sensorimotor action early in expertise development and from observing, imagining, or using abstract representations later. This commentary sharpens that proposal with cognitive load theory. We argue that action helps when it makes concept-relevant relations easier to process, such as when tracing a graph helps novices coordinate slope, variables, and change. Action can also hurt when it adds motor demands, redundant cues, or irrelevant activity without improving understanding. The central instructional aim is not movement or lower load for its own sake, but better learning, transfer, and flexible use of formal representations. We therefore reformulate the Perform First Hypothesis as embodied guidance fading: use the least embodied, task-relevant support needed for the learner’s current knowledge and the task’s element interactivity, then fade that support as schemas develop. This account yields concrete design principles, measurement recommendations, and testable predictions for embodied instruction in STEM.
Zhang等人(2026)的“执行第一假设”(Perform First Hypothesis)提出,学习者在专业发展的早期往往受益于直接的感觉运动动作,而在后期则受益于观察、想象或使用抽象表征。这篇评论用认知负荷理论强化了这一建议。我们认为,当动作使概念相关关系更容易处理时,例如当跟踪图形帮助新手坐标斜率、变量和变化时,动作是有帮助的。当动作增加了运动要求、多余的提示或不相关的活动而没有提高理解能力时,也会造成伤害。教学的中心目标不是为了运动或降低负荷,而是更好地学习、迁移和灵活地使用形式表示。因此,我们将“表现优先假说”重新表述为具具指导消退:使用学习者当前知识和任务要素交互性所需的具具最少的、与任务相关的支持,然后随着图式的发展逐渐消退。这一帐户产生具体的设计原则,测量建议,并可测试的预测体现在STEM教学。
期刊介绍:
The Educational Psychologist is a scholarly journal dedicated to exploring the psychology of learning and instruction. Articles in this journal encompass a diverse range of perspectives, from examining psychological mechanisms to exploring social and societal phenomena related to learning and instruction. The journal publishes theoretical and conceptual articles, as well as reviews and meta-analyses, that significantly contribute to theory or advance the methods used to explore educational psychology. Emphasizing innovation and advancing understanding, the journal does not publish articles solely reporting the methods and results of empirical studies; instead, all submissions, including reviews and meta-analyses, must offer clear implications for advancing theory. In addition to regular articles, the journal features special issues that delve into important themes in educational psychology, along with focal articles accompanied by peer commentary.