Systematic Review on Community-Based Assessment Checklist Tool in Indian Set Up.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shrikanth Muralidharan, Pawan Parashar, Tejaswi Sevekari
{"title":"Systematic Review on Community-Based Assessment Checklist Tool in Indian Set Up.","authors":"Shrikanth Muralidharan, Pawan Parashar, Tejaswi Sevekari","doi":"10.1177/01632787261489604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The CBAC is a simple, low-cost screening tool developed under India's National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases, and Stroke (NPCDCS) to identify individuals at risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the community level. A systematic search across six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) identified 1,842 records, of which 1,219 unique records were screened after de-duplication and automated exclusion; 47 full-text reports were assessed for eligibility and 11 studies met all inclusion criteria. The prevalence of individuals classified as high-risk for non-communicable diseases using the CBAC varied substantially, ranging from 14.4% to 68.6%. Higher CBAC scores were consistently associated with advancing age, tobacco and alcohol use, physical inactivity, increased waist circumference, family history of NCDs, and lower educational attainment. The diagnostic performance of CBAC showed moderate accuracy, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.62-0.73, and this variation was systematically related to the reference standard used: performance was weakest against a disease-specific standard (diabetes) and strongest against broader risk constructs (metabolic syndrome, general NCD risk). The reported sensitivity ranged from 42.9% to 84.7%, while the specificity ranged from 48.8% to 87.5%.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787261489604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787261489604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CBAC is a simple, low-cost screening tool developed under India's National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases, and Stroke (NPCDCS) to identify individuals at risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the community level. A systematic search across six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) identified 1,842 records, of which 1,219 unique records were screened after de-duplication and automated exclusion; 47 full-text reports were assessed for eligibility and 11 studies met all inclusion criteria. The prevalence of individuals classified as high-risk for non-communicable diseases using the CBAC varied substantially, ranging from 14.4% to 68.6%. Higher CBAC scores were consistently associated with advancing age, tobacco and alcohol use, physical inactivity, increased waist circumference, family history of NCDs, and lower educational attainment. The diagnostic performance of CBAC showed moderate accuracy, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.62-0.73, and this variation was systematically related to the reference standard used: performance was weakest against a disease-specific standard (diabetes) and strongest against broader risk constructs (metabolic syndrome, general NCD risk). The reported sensitivity ranged from 42.9% to 84.7%, while the specificity ranged from 48.8% to 87.5%.

印度建立社区评估清单工具的系统回顾。
CBAC是根据印度国家预防和控制癌症、糖尿病、心血管疾病和中风规划(NPCDCS)开发的一种简单、低成本的筛查工具,用于在社区一级确定有非传染性疾病风险的个人。系统检索6个数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL和b谷歌Scholar),确定了1842条记录,其中1219条唯一记录经过重复数据删除和自动排除后筛选;47份全文报告被评估为合格,11项研究符合所有纳入标准。使用CBAC分类为非传染性疾病高危人群的流行率差异很大,从14.4%到68.6%不等。较高的CBAC分数始终与年龄增长、吸烟和饮酒、缺乏身体活动、腰围增加、非传染性疾病家族史和较低的受教育程度相关。CBAC的诊断表现为中等准确度,曲线下面积范围为0.62-0.73,这种差异与所使用的参考标准有系统关系:对疾病特异性标准(糖尿病)的诊断表现最差,对更广泛的风险结构(代谢综合征,一般非传染性疾病风险)的诊断表现最强。敏感度为42.9% ~ 84.7%,特异度为48.8% ~ 87.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书