Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Meat Quality and Characteristic Flavor Compounds of Pacific White Shrimp

IF 6.3 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food frontiers Pub Date : 2026-08-31 DOI:10.1002/fft2.70348
Yiming Li, Nan Wang, Li Zhou, Weibin Cheng, Jiamin Song, Yanan Sun
{"title":"Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Meat Quality and Characteristic Flavor Compounds of Pacific White Shrimp","authors":"Yiming Li,&nbsp;Nan Wang,&nbsp;Li Zhou,&nbsp;Weibin Cheng,&nbsp;Jiamin Song,&nbsp;Yanan Sun","doi":"10.1002/fft2.70348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drying is widely used to extend the shelf life of Pacific white shrimp, yet different drying routes can shift meat quality and flavor formation in distinct ways. This study compared fresh shrimp (Ctrl), vacuum freeze-dried shrimp (VFD), heat-assisted vacuum freeze-drying shrimp (HAFD), hot-air-dried shrimp (HAD), and air-frying-assisted dried shrimp (AFD) by analyzing proximate composition, color, texture, free amino acids (FAAs), 5′-nucleotides, organic acids, electronic sensory fingerprints, and volatile compounds. Drying concentrated protein, fat, and ash also changed color and texture. VFD produced the lightest samples and the largest color difference, whereas HAD and AFD caused stronger hardness and adhesiveness. HAFD showed the most favorable non-volatile umami profile, with the highest total FAAs, umami FAAs, guanosine 5′-monophosphate (GMP), and equivalent umami concentration (51.35 g monosodium glutamate (MSG)/100 g). VFD retained the highest total 5′-nucleotides, whereas HAD generated the highest succinic acid and the strongest organic-acid-derived taste activity. Electronic nose and tongue analyses separated Ctrl/VFD from HAD/AFD along the main axis of principal component analysis (PCA), indicating that heat involvement reshaped aroma and taste fingerprints. Headspace solid-phase microextraction–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME–GC–MS) identified 51 volatile compounds. HAD showed the highest total pyrazines, esters, alcohols, and ketones, whereas AFD showed the highest aldehyde abundance. Overall, HAFD balanced quality retention and umami enhancement better, whereas HAD and AFD promoted stronger roasted-aroma formation. These findings provide guidance for selecting drying strategies according to target dried-shrimp flavor profiles and desired balances between mild umami and intense roasted aroma.</p>","PeriodicalId":73042,"journal":{"name":"Food frontiers","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.70348","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.70348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drying is widely used to extend the shelf life of Pacific white shrimp, yet different drying routes can shift meat quality and flavor formation in distinct ways. This study compared fresh shrimp (Ctrl), vacuum freeze-dried shrimp (VFD), heat-assisted vacuum freeze-drying shrimp (HAFD), hot-air-dried shrimp (HAD), and air-frying-assisted dried shrimp (AFD) by analyzing proximate composition, color, texture, free amino acids (FAAs), 5′-nucleotides, organic acids, electronic sensory fingerprints, and volatile compounds. Drying concentrated protein, fat, and ash also changed color and texture. VFD produced the lightest samples and the largest color difference, whereas HAD and AFD caused stronger hardness and adhesiveness. HAFD showed the most favorable non-volatile umami profile, with the highest total FAAs, umami FAAs, guanosine 5′-monophosphate (GMP), and equivalent umami concentration (51.35 g monosodium glutamate (MSG)/100 g). VFD retained the highest total 5′-nucleotides, whereas HAD generated the highest succinic acid and the strongest organic-acid-derived taste activity. Electronic nose and tongue analyses separated Ctrl/VFD from HAD/AFD along the main axis of principal component analysis (PCA), indicating that heat involvement reshaped aroma and taste fingerprints. Headspace solid-phase microextraction–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME–GC–MS) identified 51 volatile compounds. HAD showed the highest total pyrazines, esters, alcohols, and ketones, whereas AFD showed the highest aldehyde abundance. Overall, HAFD balanced quality retention and umami enhancement better, whereas HAD and AFD promoted stronger roasted-aroma formation. These findings provide guidance for selecting drying strategies according to target dried-shrimp flavor profiles and desired balances between mild umami and intense roasted aroma.

不同干燥方法对太平洋白对虾肉质及风味成分的影响
干燥被广泛用于延长太平洋白虾的保质期,但不同的干燥方式会以不同的方式改变肉的品质和风味的形成。本研究通过分析鲜虾(Ctrl)、真空冷冻干燥虾(VFD)、热辅助真空冷冻干燥虾(HAFD)、热风干燥虾(HAD)和空气油炸干燥虾(AFD)的近似组成、颜色、质地、游离氨基酸(FAAs)、5′-核苷酸、有机酸、电子感官指纹和挥发性化合物,对鲜虾(Ctrl)、真空冷冻干燥虾(VFD)、热辅助冷冻干燥虾(HAFD)和热风干燥虾(HAD)进行了比较。干燥浓缩的蛋白质、脂肪和灰分也会改变颜色和质地。VFD产生的样品最轻,色差最大,而HAD和AFD产生的硬度和粘附性更强。HAFD表现出最有利的非挥发性鲜味特征,其总FAAs、鲜味FAAs、鸟苷5′-单磷酸(GMP)和等效鲜味浓度(51.35 g味精(MSG)/100 g)最高。VFD保留了最高的总5 ' -核苷酸,而HAD产生了最高的琥珀酸和最强的有机酸衍生的味觉活性。电子鼻和舌头分析沿主成分分析(PCA)的主轴分离出Ctrl/VFD和HAD/AFD,表明热参与重塑了香气和味觉指纹。顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用(HS-SPME-GC-MS)鉴定出51种挥发性化合物。HAD的总吡嗪类、酯类、醇类和酮类含量最高,而AFD的醛类含量最高。总体而言,HAFD更好地平衡了品质保持和鲜味增强,而HAD和AFD促进了更强的烘烤香气形成。这些发现为根据目标风味特征选择干燥策略以及在温和鲜味和强烈烤香之间的期望平衡提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书