Why Stay? Local Opportunity Anchoring and Gendered Immobility in Peri-Urban China

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Hongwei Yu, Yufeng Hou
{"title":"Why Stay? Local Opportunity Anchoring and Gendered Immobility in Peri-Urban China","authors":"Hongwei Yu,&nbsp;Yufeng Hou","doi":"10.1002/psp.70371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Why women remain in split households cannot be inferred from residence alone: staying may be desired, accepted, or constrained. Drawing on two interview rounds a year apart and later online follow-up with 10 women in a peri-urban Yunnan village whose partners worked elsewhere, this article examines how staying was sustained as local tourism contracted. Six sustained employment-based staying through other local jobs; three remained through care, schooling, and remittances; one migrated as high household expenses coincided with reduced childcare demands. We define local opportunity anchoring as the employment-based pathway through which work within commuting range sustains the feasibility of residence already organised around care, schooling, and hukou: nearby jobs become usable when social networks convey job information, care arrangements make employment feasible, and earnings meet household-specific needs. The findings separate the feasibility of staying from women's orientations and show how life-course positions, linked lives, and peri-urban accessibility shape divergent trajectories.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"32 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why women remain in split households cannot be inferred from residence alone: staying may be desired, accepted, or constrained. Drawing on two interview rounds a year apart and later online follow-up with 10 women in a peri-urban Yunnan village whose partners worked elsewhere, this article examines how staying was sustained as local tourism contracted. Six sustained employment-based staying through other local jobs; three remained through care, schooling, and remittances; one migrated as high household expenses coincided with reduced childcare demands. We define local opportunity anchoring as the employment-based pathway through which work within commuting range sustains the feasibility of residence already organised around care, schooling, and hukou: nearby jobs become usable when social networks convey job information, care arrangements make employment feasible, and earnings meet household-specific needs. The findings separate the feasibility of staying from women's orientations and show how life-course positions, linked lives, and peri-urban accessibility shape divergent trajectories.

为什么留下来吗?中国城市周边地区的地方机会锚定与性别不流动
为什么妇女留在分裂的家庭中不能仅仅从居住推断:留下来可能是希望的,接受的或限制的。通过间隔一年的两轮访谈,以及随后对云南城郊村庄的10名女性的在线跟踪调查,本文考察了当地旅游业萎缩时她们是如何维持住的。通过其他本地就业机会获得六份持续的以就业为基础的住宿;三个人通过照顾、上学和汇款留下来;其中一个移民的原因是家庭开支高,同时儿童保育需求减少。我们将本地机会锚定定义为以就业为基础的途径,通过这种途径,通勤范围内的工作维持了已经围绕护理、上学和户口组织的居住的可行性:当社交网络传达工作信息、护理安排使就业可行、收入满足家庭特定需求时,附近的工作就变得可用。研究结果区分了保持女性性取向的可行性,并展示了生命历程的位置、联系的生活和城市周边的可达性如何塑造了不同的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书