Correction to “Structured or Semi-Structured? The Use of Reflection Journals in Postgraduates' Generative Artificial Intelligence Literacy Development in an L2 Academic Writing Context”

IF 5.3 3区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2026-09-04 DOI:10.1111/ejed.70855

{"title":"Correction to “Structured or Semi-Structured? The Use of Reflection Journals in Postgraduates' Generative Artificial Intelligence Literacy Development in an L2 Academic Writing Context”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Zhang, D., L. Wen, and J. G. Wu. 2025. “ Structured or Semi-Structured? The Use of Reflection Journals in Postgraduates' Generative Artificial Intelligence Literacy Development in an L2 Academic Writing Context.” European Journal of Education 60, no. 3: e70189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70189.\n 1. In paragraph 4 of Section 4.1.1, the data for Dimension 4 were originally reported as ‘(F(1,37) = 0.082, p = 0.231, partial η2 = 0.010)’.The correct values should be ‘(F(1,37) = 0.357, p = 0.554, partial η2 = 0.010)’. This correction does not affect the study's conclusions.2. In paragraph 3 of Section 4.1.1, the results were originally reported as:‘MANOVA revealed a significant main effect of time (Pillai's Trace = 0.305, F(4, 71) = 7.8, p < 0.001). However, the main effect of group (Pillai's Trace = 0.108, F(4, 71) = 2.145, p = 0.084) and the Time × Group interaction (Pillai's Trace = 0.044, F(4, 71) = 0.825, p = 0.513) were not significant across the four dimensions.’The correct results should be:‘MANOVA revealed a significant main effect of time (Pillai's Trace = 0.533, F(4, 34) = 9.704, p < 0.001). However, the main effect of group (Pillai's Trace = 0.171, F(4, 34) = 1.751, p = 0.162) and the Time × Group interaction (Pillai's Trace = 0.141, F(4, 34) = 1.390, p = 0.258) were not significant across the four dimensions.’ This correction does not affect the study's conclusions.The authors apologise for the errors.","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70855","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zhang, D., L. Wen, and J. G. Wu. 2025. “ Structured or Semi-Structured? The Use of Reflection Journals in Postgraduates' Generative Artificial Intelligence Literacy Development in an L2 Academic Writing Context.” European Journal of Education 60, no. 3: e70189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70189.

1. In paragraph 4 of Section 4.1.1, the data for Dimension 4 were originally reported as ‘(F(1,37) = 0.082, p = 0.231, partial η² = 0.010)’.

The correct values should be ‘(F(1,37) = 0.357, p = 0.554, partial η² = 0.010)’. This correction does not affect the study's conclusions.

2. In paragraph 3 of Section 4.1.1, the results were originally reported as:

‘MANOVA revealed a significant main effect of time (Pillai's Trace = 0.305, F(4, 71) = 7.8, p < 0.001). However, the main effect of group (Pillai's Trace = 0.108, F(4, 71) = 2.145, p = 0.084) and the Time × Group interaction (Pillai's Trace = 0.044, F(4, 71) = 0.825, p = 0.513) were not significant across the four dimensions.’

The correct results should be:

‘MANOVA revealed a significant main effect of time (Pillai's Trace = 0.533, F(4, 34) = 9.704, p < 0.001). However, the main effect of group (Pillai's Trace = 0.171, F(4, 34) = 1.751, p = 0.162) and the Time × Group interaction (Pillai's Trace = 0.141, F(4, 34) = 1.390, p = 0.258) were not significant across the four dimensions.’ This correction does not affect the study's conclusions.

The authors apologise for the errors.

查看原文本刊更多论文

更正“结构化还是半结构化？”反思性期刊在二语学术写作情境下研究生生成性人工智能素养培养中的应用

张迪，温利，吴建国。2025。“结构化还是半结构化？”在二语学术写作语境下，反思期刊在研究生生成式人工智能素养培养中的应用。欧洲教育杂志，第60期。3: e70189。https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70189。1. 在第4.1.1节第4段中，维度4的数据最初报告为“（F(1,37) = 0.082, p = 0.231，偏η2 = 0.010）”。正确的值应为“（F(1,37) = 0.357, p = 0.554，偏η2 = 0.010）”。这一更正不影响研究的结论。在第4.1.1节第3段中，结果最初报道为：MANOVA揭示了时间的显著主效应（Pillai's Trace = 0.305， F(4,71) = 7.8, p < 0.001）。然而，群体的主效应（Pillai’s Trace = 0.108， F(4,71) = 2.145, p = 0.084）和时间与群体的交互作用（Pillai’s Trace = 0.044， F(4,71) = 0.825, p = 0.513）在四个维度上均不显著。正确的结果应该是：方差分析揭示了时间的显著主效应（Pillai's Trace = 0.533， F(4,34) = 9.704, p < 0.001）。然而，群体的主效应（Pillai’s Trace = 0.171， F(4,34) = 1.751, p = 0.162）和时间与群体的交互作用（Pillai’s Trace = 0.141， F(4,34) = 1.390, p = 0.258）在四个维度上均不显著。这一修正并不影响研究的结论。作者为这些错误道歉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.