A systematic review: methods to measure total mixed ration uniformity.

IF 4.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Isabela G M A Santos, Amy R Reibman, Jacquelyn P Boerman
{"title":"A systematic review: methods to measure total mixed ration uniformity.","authors":"Isabela G M A Santos, Amy R Reibman, Jacquelyn P Boerman","doi":"10.3168/jds.2026-28913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A uniform TMR ensures that the diet being delivered to the cows is consistent across time, both within a batch and across days. A systematic literature review was conducted to describe the different methods that have been utilized to measure within-batch TMR uniformity. Scientific papers that utilized methods to measure TMR uniformity were identified through a search in the Scopus database, which was conducted with no restrictions on the date of study publication or publication type. After filtering processes, 22 papers were selected for full review based on their relevance to within-batch TMR uniformity. Of the studies reviewed, 11 utilized particle size-based methods such as the Penn State Particle Separator (PSPS), 4 utilized tracer-based methods, 7 utilized nutrient analyses, 4 utilized near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and 4 utilized image analysis or modeling techniques. Overall, there is no standardized or universally accepted method to assess TMR uniformity. Importantly, the methods identified should not be interpreted as equivalent, as each captures different aspects of uniformity, including physical structure, ingredient distribution, and chemical composition. Direct measurement methods, such as particle size and nutrient analysis, provide valuable information but are often labor-intensive and time-consuming. Indirect approaches, such as NIRS and image analysis, offer promising alternatives by reducing labor requirements and enabling faster or real-time assessments, although they still require further validation under practical feeding conditions. Therefore, future developments should focus on integrating physical, chemical, and optical indicators into cost-effective, automated tools capable of supporting routine monitoring of TMR uniformity in precision feeding systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2026-28913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A uniform TMR ensures that the diet being delivered to the cows is consistent across time, both within a batch and across days. A systematic literature review was conducted to describe the different methods that have been utilized to measure within-batch TMR uniformity. Scientific papers that utilized methods to measure TMR uniformity were identified through a search in the Scopus database, which was conducted with no restrictions on the date of study publication or publication type. After filtering processes, 22 papers were selected for full review based on their relevance to within-batch TMR uniformity. Of the studies reviewed, 11 utilized particle size-based methods such as the Penn State Particle Separator (PSPS), 4 utilized tracer-based methods, 7 utilized nutrient analyses, 4 utilized near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and 4 utilized image analysis or modeling techniques. Overall, there is no standardized or universally accepted method to assess TMR uniformity. Importantly, the methods identified should not be interpreted as equivalent, as each captures different aspects of uniformity, including physical structure, ingredient distribution, and chemical composition. Direct measurement methods, such as particle size and nutrient analysis, provide valuable information but are often labor-intensive and time-consuming. Indirect approaches, such as NIRS and image analysis, offer promising alternatives by reducing labor requirements and enabling faster or real-time assessments, although they still require further validation under practical feeding conditions. Therefore, future developments should focus on integrating physical, chemical, and optical indicators into cost-effective, automated tools capable of supporting routine monitoring of TMR uniformity in precision feeding systems.

系统综述了测量混合日粮均匀度的方法。
统一的TMR确保了在同一批次和几天内喂给奶牛的饲料是一致的。进行了系统的文献综述,以描述不同的方法,已用于测量批内TMR均匀性。使用TMR均匀性测量方法的科学论文是通过在Scopus数据库中检索确定的,该检索不受研究发表日期和发表类型的限制。经过筛选过程,根据其与批内TMR均匀性的相关性,选择22篇论文进行全面审查。在回顾的研究中,11项使用了基于颗粒大小的方法,如宾夕法尼亚州立大学颗粒分离器(PSPS), 4项使用了基于示踪剂的方法,7项使用了营养分析,4项使用了近红外光谱(NIRS), 4项使用了图像分析或建模技术。总的来说,没有标准化或普遍接受的方法来评估TMR的均匀性。重要的是,所确定的方法不应被解释为等效,因为每种方法都捕获了均匀性的不同方面,包括物理结构,成分分布和化学成分。直接测量方法,如粒度和养分分析,提供了有价值的信息,但往往是劳动密集型和耗时的。间接方法,如近红外光谱和图像分析,通过减少劳动力需求和实现更快或实时的评估,提供了有希望的替代方法,尽管它们仍需要在实际喂养条件下进一步验证。因此,未来的发展应侧重于将物理、化学和光学指标整合到具有成本效益的自动化工具中,这些工具能够支持精密喂料系统中TMR均匀性的常规监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书