NFT design choices and the heterogeneity of investor responses

IF 8.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2026.03.006
Navid Bahmani, Amit Bhatnagar, Minakshi Trivedi
{"title":"NFT design choices and the heterogeneity of investor responses","authors":"Navid Bahmani,&nbsp;Amit Bhatnagar,&nbsp;Minakshi Trivedi","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2026.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have recently emerged as a new category of consumer-facing digital assets that firms design and commercialize through digital marketplaces, often linking them to branded collectibles, experiences, or physical products. As firms increasingly experiment with these digital offerings, investors must evaluate whether NFT initiatives represent meaningful retail innovations that create value or speculative initiatives that dilute firm resources. This study examines how investors evaluate firms’ design and commercialization choices when introducing NFTs as consumer-facing digital retail offerings distributed through online marketplaces. Using an event study of NFT announcements made by publicly traded U.S. firms, we document substantial heterogeneity in investor responses: nearly half of NFT announcements are associated with positive stock-market reactions, and the distribution of abnormal returns is wide and highly dispersed. We show that specific design and commercialization attributes systematically shape these responses. In particular, NFTs that incorporate in-real-life capabilities (e.g., physical products or experiences), rely on environmentally friendly proof-of-stake blockchain technology, and employ paid pricing strategies generate more favorable investor reactions. By identifying the retail design and commercialization choices that shift NFT initiatives toward value creation rather than value destruction, our study provides new insight into how investors interpret emerging digital retail offerings and offers guidance for firms experimenting with NFT-based commercialization strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":"102 3","pages":"Pages 622-637"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435926000254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have recently emerged as a new category of consumer-facing digital assets that firms design and commercialize through digital marketplaces, often linking them to branded collectibles, experiences, or physical products. As firms increasingly experiment with these digital offerings, investors must evaluate whether NFT initiatives represent meaningful retail innovations that create value or speculative initiatives that dilute firm resources. This study examines how investors evaluate firms’ design and commercialization choices when introducing NFTs as consumer-facing digital retail offerings distributed through online marketplaces. Using an event study of NFT announcements made by publicly traded U.S. firms, we document substantial heterogeneity in investor responses: nearly half of NFT announcements are associated with positive stock-market reactions, and the distribution of abnormal returns is wide and highly dispersed. We show that specific design and commercialization attributes systematically shape these responses. In particular, NFTs that incorporate in-real-life capabilities (e.g., physical products or experiences), rely on environmentally friendly proof-of-stake blockchain technology, and employ paid pricing strategies generate more favorable investor reactions. By identifying the retail design and commercialization choices that shift NFT initiatives toward value creation rather than value destruction, our study provides new insight into how investors interpret emerging digital retail offerings and offers guidance for firms experimenting with NFT-based commercialization strategies.
NFT设计选择与投资者反应的异质性
不可替代代币(nft)最近成为一种新的面向消费者的数字资产类别,公司通过数字市场设计和商业化,通常将其与品牌收藏品、体验或实体产品联系起来。随着公司越来越多地尝试这些数字产品,投资者必须评估NFT举措是代表了创造价值的有意义的零售创新,还是稀释公司资源的投机举措。本研究考察了投资者在引入nft作为通过在线市场分销的面向消费者的数字零售产品时,如何评估公司的设计和商业化选择。通过对美国上市公司发布的NFT公告的事件研究,我们记录了投资者反应的实质性异质性:近一半的NFT公告与积极的股市反应有关,异常回报的分布广泛且高度分散。我们表明,特定的设计和商业化属性系统地塑造了这些反应。特别是,nft结合了现实生活中的能力(例如,物理产品或体验),依赖于环保的权益证明区块链技术,并采用付费定价策略,会产生更有利的投资者反应。通过确定零售设计和商业化选择,将NFT计划转向价值创造而不是价值破坏,我们的研究为投资者如何解读新兴的数字零售产品提供了新的见解,并为尝试基于NFT的商业化战略的公司提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书